Roundup of interesting articles, April 2019

A group of aerospace engineers built a new type of plane covered in hundreds of mechanical “feather” flaps. They can be independently raised and lowered, more efficiently doing the same maneuvering functions as traditional control surfaces like ailerons, rudders, and elevators.
https://phys.org/news/2019-04-mit-nasa-kind-airplane-wing.html

The F-14 could independently swing each of its wings, like birds, which assisted in turning.
http://www.grummanpark.org/content/tomcat-tales-f-14a-aircraft-no-3-buno-157982

The F-8 could pivot its wings up and down, like birds, which assisted in landings and takeoffs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable-incidence_wing

Where am I going with this? With more advanced materials, we could build flexible yet strong airplane wings that could move and morph like bird wings, dramatically improving their efficiency and maneuverability. However, I doubt it would make sense to make them capable of flapping, and it would be better to propel them with traditional engines.

The largest aircraft ever built just did its first test flight. The “Roc” transport will carry space rockets to high altitude before they fire up their engines.
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/27427/stratolaunchs-roc-the-worlds-largest-aircraft-has-flown-for-the-first-time

Richard Branson’s Unity aircraft took its first passenger to the edge of space. 600 more people have bought passenger tickets for future flights.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/22/richard-bransons-virgin-galactic-sends-first-test-passenger-on-spaceflight.html

Branson said he’d do this by the end of 2018, but EH…close enough.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2017/04/02/sir-richard-branson-vows-have-virgin-galactic-passengers-space/

In another breakthrough, SpaceX safely landed three rocket boosters after a successful space mission.
https://www.theverge.com/2019/4/11/18305112/spacex-falcon-heavy-launch-rocket-landing-success-failure

Unable to land a man on the Moon first, the Soviets tried to steal a small bit of America’s thunder by using an unmanned probe to return the first Moon rock to Earth, just days before Apollo 11 was to do so. It failed.
https://www.amusingplanet.com/2019/04/luna-15-soviet-probe-that-tried-to.html

NASA’s plan to build a space station orbiting the Moon is probably a bad idea.
https://spacenews.com/op-ed-lunar-gateway-or-moon-direct/

The first attempt by a private company to land a craft on the Moon failed.
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-47879538

There’s a new book about the near-misses in the history of DNA’s discovery.
http://www.rationaloptimist.com/blog/the-history-of-dna/

It now costs only $229 to fully sequence a human genome (including its mitochondrial DNA). In 2000, the first human genome was sequenced at the cost of billions of dollars.
https://www.biospace.com/article/on-dna-day-2019-dante-labs-announces-229-whole-genome-offer-with-90-day-result-guarantee/

Genes responsible for math ability have been found.
http://infoproc.blogspot.com/2019/04/genomic-prediction-of-flow-of-students.html

A 61-year-old woman used IVF and an egg donor to give birth to her own granddaughter.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/30/us/woman-gives-birth-to-granddaughter/index.html

The HPV vaccine reduces cervical cancer risk by about 90%.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-47803975

The field of dentistry has major problems with opacity of pricing, overtreatments, and shaky science behind things like the value of visiting the dentist twice a year instead of just once.
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/05/the-trouble-with-dentistry/586039/

“There’s no theoretical reason for [the AI radiologist software] not to become as good as the best breast radiologists in the world.”
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/04/01/707675965/training-a-computer-to-read-mammograms-as-well-as-a-doctor

After failing to live up to the hype, IBM has canceled their “Watson for Drug Discovery” AI.
https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2019/04/18/farewell-to-watson-for-drug-discovery

A brain implant can decode the words a person is speaking by scanning his brain activity.
https://boingboing.net/2019/04/24/brain-computer-interface-succe.html

Ten years ago, Henry Markram said that a detailed, working simulation of a human brain could be built in ten years.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8164060.stm

Scientists were able to use a chemical cocktail to preserve pig brains and maintain chemical activity in the nerve tissue for several hours after death. A steady flow of a few million dollars per year on research like this could sharply improve human cryonics techniques.
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/04/17/714289322/scientists-restore-some-function-in-the-brains-of-dead-pigs

Our ability to vision what’s happening inside of individual cells is improving.
https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2019/04/17/down-to-the-single-cells

One of my predictions: ‘A global network of sensors and drones will identify and track every non-microscopic species on the planet…The monitoring network will also make it possible to get highly accurate, real-time counts of entire species populations.’
https://qz.com/1600255/botanists-are-using-drones-to-rediscover-extinct-flowers/

Apple has terminated its “AirPower” wireless charging mats for smartphones and other personal devices. This isn’t any loss since the mats had no significant advantages over traditional plug-in chargers.
http://social.techcrunch.com/2019/03/29/apple-cancels-airpower-product-citing-inability-to-meet-its-high-standards-for-hardware/

Microsoft actually unveiled the first smartwatch in 2004.
https://wear.guide/smartwatch-reviews/2004-microsoft-spot-watch-smartwatch/

Here are the top ten failed predictions about how Bitcoin wouldn’t hit a wall in 2018.
https://qz.com/1171977/ten-2018-predictions-from-the-founder-of-the-blockchain-research-institute/

Elon Musk, 2016: Tesla will sell 500,000 vehicles in 2018.
Actual 2018 figures: 350,000 vehicles
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/In-Gear/2016/0511/Can-Tesla-really-make-500-000-cars-by-the-end-of-2018
https://qz.com/1513166/tesla-reports-record-production-numbers-in-2018/

Elon Musk, early 2018: Tesla will start selling fully autonomous cars by the end of this year.
Elon Musk, early 2019: Tesla will start selling fully autonomous cars by the end of 2020.
https://www.theverge.com/2018/6/11/17449076/tesla-autopilot-full-self-driving-elon-musk
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-48021380

If you’ve ever visited a crowded, poor country, you know how many people stand to benefit from replacing gas-powered vehicles (cars, buses, motorcycles, etc.) with electric vehicles that are quiet and emit no smoke. Billions of people suffer from the noise and stink of gas-powered vehicles, and probably tens of millions die prematurely each year from inhaling their smoke. If Elon Musk accelerates the global transition to electric vehicles by just one year, the benefit to humanity will be enormous. Similarly, it was inevitable that smartphones would be invented and popularized, but Steve Jobs’ leadership and energy made it happen years sooner.
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2019/04/elon-measures-tesla-by-time-reduction-to-replacing-regular-2-5-billion-cars-and-trucks.html

Ford’s CEO predicts autonomous cars will arrive in 2021, but their applications will be narrow thanks to technological limitations.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-09/ford-ceo-tamps-down-expectations-for-first-autonomous-vehicles

Autonomous cars will reduce light pollution since their cameras and sensors would see in the dark, reducing the need for headlights and streetlights (I started writing a blog entry on this over a year ago but never finished).
https://qz.com/1596575/could-driverless-cars-reduce-light-pollution/

Donald Trump predicts that Joe Biden or Bernie Sanders will be the Democrats’ 2020 Presidential nominee.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6930369/Trump-predicts-Biden-Sanders-2020-Dem-finalists.html

Improvements to image processing algorithms mean that cheap cameras could replace expensive laser LIDAR devices in autonomous cars.
http://news.cornell.edu/stories/2019/04/new-way-see-objects-accelerates-future-self-driving-cars

The “Thucydides Trap” argument that the U.S. and China are destined for war is flawed because 14 out of the 16 historical precedents it cites involve Europe and/or the U.S. If the methodology is applied to analyzing power transitions in East Asian history, only three of 18 led to war.
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/skeptics/us-china-war-really-possible-54232

China built its first, indigenously designed nuclear reactor in 1991. It just upgraded that reactor, and is a world leader in nuclear technology.
http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/China-uprates-its-oldest-reactor

The U.S. is losing the nuclear power export market to Russia and China because they offer lower prices and fewer end-use rules.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/21/trump-aims-to-beat-china-and-russia-in-nuclear-energy-export-race.html

Russia’s military aerospace industry is foundering because it is too centralized, and led by incompetent men picked for political reasons.
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/doomed-fail-why-russias-stealth-su-57-serious-trouble-45997

Russia just sold several of its advanced Su-35 fighters to China, knowing full well the latter will reverse-engineer them. Since China is rapidly catching up to Russia technologically, Russia might as well sell their best equipment before the demand vanishes.
https://www.janes.com/article/87934/russia-completes-deliveries-of-su-35-fighter-aircraft-to-china

Albania is trying to sell 50 vintage fighter planes that it stored away in caves.
https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/aviation/a27008434/albania-underground-air-force-sale-fighter-planes/

The list of horrible accidents in the Soviet/Russian nuclear submarine fleet goes on and on…
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/nuclear-nightmares-russias-first-nuclear-powered-submarines-had-lots-problems-51352

Russia is scrapping two of its four battlecruisers due to lack of money. As late as 2014, the Russians were thumping their chests over their plans to fix up all four and return them to service. Of the remaining two, one is seaworthy and the other has been awaiting repairs for 20 years.
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/russian-navy-dismantling-two-massive-nuclear-battlecruisers-heres-why-53827

China’s first Type 055 destroyer has entered active service. This class of ship is only slightly less capable than the U.S. Navy’s destroyers. Another three Type 001s have been built, but have yet to enter service, and China has plans to build at least four more.
https://www.janes.com/article/88060/chinese-navy-puts-newest-platforms-on-display

There are many different, incomplete metrics for gauging the relative strength of a country’s navy. Tonnage of the entire fleet and the number of ships in the fleet are merely starting points, though they’re often misused by people with political agendas to make navies seem stronger or weaker than they really are.
https://warontherocks.com/2014/07/sinking-the-next-13-navies-fallacy/

The White House has ordered the U.S. government to study the risks of EMP weapons and to prepare response plans for EMP attacks.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-coordinating-national-resilience-electromagnetic-pulses/

A scientific group believes that an EMP attack or solar flare would, at worst, temporarily knock out power to some regions of the U.S.
https://www.wired.com/story/the-grid-might-survive-an-electromagnetic-pulse-just-fine/

The U.S. Navy is writing new procedures for its pilots to report UFO sightings.
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/23/us-navy-guidelines-reporting-ufos-1375290

Aviation enthusiasts in Texas captured photos of what looks like a secret, triangular, U.S. military plane.
https://youtu.be/lSGLBb3k80U

Before the age of spy satellites, the U.S. used unmanned, Mach 3 drones to fly deep into China for reconnaissance missions.
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/check-out-d-21-mach-3-drone-us-used-spy-chinas-nuclear-weapons-52972

The U.S. has spy satellites with infrared vision cameras sensitive enough to see small missile launches and aircraft explosions.
https://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/these-are-the-doomsday-satellites-that-detected-the-exp-1737434876

The USAF is upgrading its F-16s with new radars that are also used in the F-35.
https://defensemaven.io/warriormaven/air/air-force-f-16-gets-f-35-sensors-weapons-radar-uHz4bVom_EiIztCPrSWE0w/

Less than a month after getting its first squadron of F-35 fighters, one of Japan’s planes crashed, killing the pilot.
https://www.defensenews.com/air/2019/04/09/a-japanese-f-35a-fighter-jet-is-missing-remaining-12-are-grounded/

The last member of the WWII “Doolittle Raid” on Japan died. I knew many WWII veterans when I was a kid, and it feels weird knowing that my own kids will only know that generation through secondhand stories told by people like me.
https://apnews.com/7fbe2e34adb346ef8d0f8994ff0d4e55

In an incident kept secret for years, 400 U.S. soldiers were killed by friendly fire while rehearsing the D-Day invasion in Britain.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6963313/The-tragic-tale-Slapton-Sands.html

Britain should have armed itself with the German-made Leopard 2 tank instead of building an indigenous tank (the Challenger 2).
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/bad-news-british-army-bought-wrong-tank-52727

In the 1970s, the USAF designed “flying aircraft carriers” comprised of 747s full of “micro-fighters.”
https://youtu.be/drnxZlS9gyw

Last month, U.S. B-52 bombers did a simulated nuclear attack mission against Russia. Though the bombers turned away 60 miles from Russian airspace, the nuclear cruise missiles they fire in a real attack can travel hundreds of miles.
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/scary-drill-us-b-52-bombers-practiced-nuclear-attacks-russia-last-month-50352

“Meal kits” might be better for the environment than making meals at home by yourself. This is because the kits have pre-measured quantities of food meant for one meal–most people eat everything in the box in one sitting. However, if you fill your refrigerator with ingredients and make your meals ad hoc, you’ll probably lose track of how fast everything is spoiling, forcing you to constantly throw food out.
https://news.umich.edu/those-home-delivered-meal-kits-are-greener-than-you-thought-new-study-concludes/

Between meal kits and drones rapidly and cheaply delivering goods to peoples’ homes, will it make sense for people–particularly those in cities–to have kitchens? A kitchenette would be good enough, and the space formerly devoted to a full kitchen could be repurposed for, say, a VR game chamber.

Plastic food packaging like cellophane is actually GOOD for the environment when you factor in the amount of food and beverage spoilage it prevents.
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-47161379

Yet another study shows that vertical farms are impractically expensive ways to grow food. Why not just enclose existing, open-air farms in one-story greenhouses? The crops could be transported to population centers on electric trucks.
https://qz.com/1595640/the-trouble-with-the-urban-farming-revolution/

A critical concept that too many environmentalists fail to grasp is that almost EVERY human activity uses energy and releases pollution. Instead of buying that new dress made of organic, sustainably farmed hemp, you shouldn’t buy a dress at all.
https://qz.com/1600886/the-best-thing-you-can-do-on-earth-day-is-sit-perfectly-still/

Nuclear power is much cleaner, and wind power is much less clean, than most people think.
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2019/04/nuclear-energy-is-50-better-than-solar-for-lifetime-co2-emissions.html

A new study indicates that Americans and Canadians are the likeliest people in the Western world to falsely claim expertise in domains of knowledge. This is bothersome in itself, and also suggests that measures of the “Dunning-Kruger effect” might be inflated: There are dumb people who don’t know they are dumb and honestly think they are smart, but there are also dumb people why know they are dumb and deliberately lie about being smart, and surveys measuring the Dunning-Kruger effect might not be able to tell them apart.
https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2019/04/26/on-the-dunning-kruger-effect-and-on-fakers

A very smart, rich man with a computer background just wrote a book that argues we’re living in a computer simulation, and we’ll have the technology to make Matrix-like VR worlds within 100 years.
https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/4/10/18275618/simulation-hypothesis-matrix-rizwan-virk

Here’s a useful summary of S-curves, the Gartner Hype Cycle, and future forecasting. I think VR is at the “Early Adopters” tech phase, and will leap “The Chasm” during the 2020s.
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/oaqKjHbgsoqEXBMZ2/s-curves-for-trend-forecasting

AI is being used to “upscale” the graphics of old video games. I predict this will also be used to colorize and visually sharpen footage from old films and TV shows. The audio could be improved through similar automated processes.
https://www.theverge.com/2019/4/18/18311287/ai-upscaling-algorithms-video-games-mods-modding-esrgan-gigapixel

Microsoft has unveiled a new version of its XBox One game console that lacks a disc drive and can only download games from the internet. My 2020s predictions are thus closer to reality:
-Video gaming will dispense with physical media, and games will be completely streamed from the internet or digitally downloaded. Business that exist just to sell game discs (Gamestop) will shut down.
-Instead of a typical home entertainment system having a whole bunch of media discs, different media players and cable boxes, there will be one small, multipurpose box

https://qz.com/1597265/the-digital-xbox-one-x-kills-the-used-game-market/

Two very smart dudes discuss Ted Kaczynski’s primitivist, anti-technology ideas and the major flaws in those ideas. For one, forsaking technology is practically impossible since all countries would have to agree to do so. If just one country refused, it would come to possess an insurmountable military technology advantage over the rest of the world and could conquer them and destroy their primitive ways of life.
https://youtu.be/ZmAqKsasNKk

Almost all of the atoms in your body are at least 5 billion years old. Some were created not long (in cosmic scales) after the Big Bang. Ancient artifacts and dinosaur bones are, in a sense, no older than you are.
https://www.quora.com/How-old-are-the-atoms-in-my-body

Inside an advanced, gymnasium-sized lab, engineers can reproduce wildfires and hurricanes, and build small houses that have experimental safety features.
https://www.npr.org/2019/04/02/704854496/step-1-build-a-house-step-2-set-it-on-fire

An analysis of the tactical mistakes the good guys made during the Battle of Winterfell.
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/battle-winterfell-why-living-were-slaughtered-4-ways-it-could-have-been-avoided-55067

The meaning of life

From a biological perspective, the meaning of any organism’s life is to dominate its species’ genepool. That can be done by eliminating or subduing rivals and/or by producing as many offspring as possible that survive to adulthood. Though we humans resist thinking that this applies to us, a passing familiarity with evolutionary psychology makes it clear that the instinct to dominate others (or at least reduce others so they are less powerful) and to reproduce underlies countless aspects of our thinking and behavior. In the short term and long term, a human’s goal is to increase his “slice” of the human genetic “pie” as much as possible.

A question I’ve been pondering lately is how present and future technology could be best used to satisfy this biological imperative. Donating your eggs or sperm to people who want to use IVF to create children is probably the smartest strategy right now since the amount of effort (especially for sperm donation) is minimal, but the genetic payoff is large since someone else bears the costs of raising your offspring (note that this implies that you adopting a genetically unrelated child is the worst strategy). If sperm and egg banks reject you as being beneath their donor standards, there’s always the wonderful world of direct, private donations (one example:
https://www.justababy.com/ ).

Failing that, or in addition to it, you should of course conceive and raise biological children of your own. If this is impossible due to infertility or an inability to find a partner, technology again offers solutions. Convincing a close blood relative to donate their sperm or eggs to you for IVF would allow you to conceive a child that shared much of your DNA. If your problem is singlehood, then the solution is going to a sperm or egg bank (though this is a much more expensive option for men since they have to pay surrogate mothers to bear the child). It goes without saying that you should pick a donor that has high reproductive fitness.

Once it becomes possible to clone humans, it might make sense for you to do that instead of having children the normal way. From a genetic standpoint, a child conceived the normal way only shares 50% of your DNA (with the other 50% coming from your partner or “donor”), whereas your clone would share 100% with you. In an important biological sense, making a clone of yourself is as good as having two children with someone else. Your genes don’t get diluted from one generation to the next. Moreover, since intelligence and personality traits are heavily genetic, it would probably be easier for you to raise a clone since you’d already know your offspring’s strengths and weaknesses and because you’d think and act similarly.

Pushing the technological envelope farther, it would be even better if you made genetically engineered clones of yourself. When your clone was still just a fertilized egg, you would use genetic engineering techniques to change genes that coded for your known flaws, like defects of appearance or a congenital health problem. The resulting person wouldn’t be a true clone since it would have these “tweaks,” but it would still be incredibly similar to you. It’s probably better to have a “99.9% clone” that lacked some of your weaknesses than a 100% clone that had them, as the latter would be likelier to live long, reproduce, and attain the social and financial means to support their own offspring better.

Taking advantage of technologies that extend your lifespan and maintain your health also supports your biological imperative. It leaves you with more time and ability to raise children of your own, and even after your own reproductive years are done or you’ve gotten too infirm to be a primary caregiver, to also care for your grandchildren and other blood descendants. So long as you are a positive presence, your efforts will advance their survival, and hence the proliferation of your genes. Of note is the fact that cryonically preserving yourself upon death is included among the array of technologies that could extend your lifespan. Even a 1% chance of being resurrected to continue spreading your seed and/or helping your descendants is better than the 0% chance you get by not opting for cryonics.

Finally, an overlooked way to use technology to perpetuate your genes is to sequence your genome and then ensure the data survive after your death, so hopefully someone might use it to clone you in the future. Because gene sequencing costs are dropping, most people will be able to easily afford this within ten years. Taking pains to protect the data–perhaps by making several backups and periodically cross-checking them for fixity–and arranging for the file to be made public or transferred to a major genetic database in the event of your death would be the second element of the plan. Attaching a message to it saying you wish to be cloned would raise the chances of it happening (again, 1% is better than 0%).

I used to view the project to catalog the genomes of humans as special a thing unto itself, somehow more mystical and important than the rest of the scientific enterprise, but then I realized it was just part of the much broader, millennia-spanning effort to gather data on everything around us. The body of science and of known facts expands, and it’s almost incidental that our knowledge of human genetics is included. Today’s internet already represents a massive store of such knowledge, and the future internet (or whatever the internet evolves into) will be even bigger and more detailed. I can imagine a day when very advanced genetic labs will have access to the genomes of trillions of unique humans and animals, and could use the genomic data to synthesize any one of the individuals from scratch.

And there you have it. Even if the product of such a synthesis procedure wouldn’t be “you,” it would be a clone of you, and if the perpetuation of your genes is the ultimate meaning of your life, the creation of a clone of you in the far future would advance your interests.

Roundup of interesting articles, March 2019

Robotics company “Festo” has built a new, highly dexterous robot arm made of soft components, and trained it in 3D virtual environments on how to handle objects in the real world. For safety reasons, I predict house robots will need to be soft and as lightweight as possible to work around humans.
https://gizmodo.com/this-remarkably-agile-robot-hand-teaches-itself-how-to-1832960417

Uber has been found not criminally liable for last year’s accident where one of its self-driving cars fatally struck a homeless woman.
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-47468391

A British computer program can accurately predict when individual humans will die.
https://www.livescience.com/65087-ai-premature-death-prediction.html

The Apple Watch has led to about 500 people getting diagnosed with heart problems.
http://news.trust.org/item/20190316134851-5cktc/

After we build the first AGI, I guess the plan is to have it read “Cyc”: ‘Cyc is the world’s longest-lived artificial intelligence project, attempting to assemble a comprehensive ontology and knowledge base that spans the basic concepts and “rules of thumb” about how the world works…’
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyc

How much more efficient would the world be if it were full of intelligent machines that never forgot anything and had no biases?
https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2019/03/04/institutional-memory

China’s state-run news agency unveiled a nearly lifelike, CGI TV news anchor named “Xin Xiaomeng.”
https://www.odditycentral.com/news/china-unveils-worlds-first-ai-female-news-anchor-and-she-looks-eerily-realistic.html

After Colorado made IUDs free in clinics for poor women, teen births dropped 20%.
http://www.nber.org/papers/w25656

I bet the parents would have cloned their dead son if the technology existed. Using his sperm for IVF is the second-best option.
https://apnews.com/c1759a1b1fa04abbb591fe169f9d7ce8

Sheep sperm that was frozen for 50 years was just used to impregnate several female sheep. The birth rate was as high as that of sperm frozen for only one year. There’s no known “shelf life” for frozen mammalian sperm and eggs.
https://phys.org/news/2019-03-ram-sperm-frozen-years-successfully.html

China just cloned one of its finest police dogs.
‘A police officer [said] that preserving the police dog blood has always been a challenge for breeders, as traditional breeding methods would dilute the original, and the next generation’s genes will be largely beyond control.’
http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1142709.shtml

The number of neurons in an animal’s cerebral cortex positively correlates with its intelligence. This is true across species and among humans.
https://slatestarcodex.com/2019/03/25/neurons-and-intelligence-a-birdbrained-perspective/

The size of your brain positively correlates with your IQ. (Your hat size provides a rough approximation of your brain size.)
https://www.gwern.net/docs/iq/2019-lee.pdf

Contrary to what some believe, standardized test scores like the SAT and GRE do positively correlate with IQ and career attainment.
http://infoproc.blogspot.com/2019/03/annals-of-psychometry-35-years-of.html

fMRI tests show how strongly subconscious thoughts can influence our effortful thinking and choices. How much “free will” do humans really have?
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-39813-y

Long-term marital satisfaction is partly determined by your genes, in particular, by a gene that codes for your brain’s oxytocin receptors.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0213083

Many people are mentally ill because the stresses and demands of postmodern life don’t mesh with human nature, which adapted to suit the hunter-gatherer lifestyles we had for the first 95% of our species’ existence.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/susceptibility-to-mental-illness-may-have-helped-humans-adapt-over-the-millennia/

The FDA has approved the use of ketamine to treat depression.
https://apnews.com/6bf8d3dbe4c2411894635f11418b74dc

This population analysis of the genomes of people living in Iberia is interesting, but also hits home that the region has been a melting pot of different ethnic groups for so long that there’s little value in trying to trace back anyone’s lineage.
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-47540792

A German study shows that wind turbines are not as cheap and don’t make as much electricity as thought only a few years ago. Many people forget that wind turbines (and solar panels) slowly wear out and lose efficiency until they have to be replaced.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0211028

Now that China has banned imports of garbage, there’s no cheap solution to America’s recycling woes.
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2019/03/china-has-stopped-accepting-our-trash/584131/

Coastal marshes could turn into gigantic carbon sinks as the planet warms, offsetting the impact of climate change. There are so many things we don’t yet understand about how the planet’s climate works as a system.
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-47472602

Houseplants are orders of magnitude less efficient at filtering toxins from interior air than standard HVAC systems.
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/03/indoor-plants-clean-air-best-none-them/584509/

The first broadcast TV quality videos were wirelessly transmitted from a research sub to the surface, using pulses of blue light to convey the signal.
https://apnews.com/fbdafe93e00c432a94b3a190a890ff21

A Star Trek fan used a machine learning program to digitally enhance clips from Deep Space Nine, effectively converting them into HD footage. I predict that techniques like this will be used to clean up footage of old films and TV shows, and it will become possible to enhance the audio as well. Eventually, there will be highly accurate colorizations of black-and-white footage.
https://io9.gizmodo.com/a-fan-made-attempt-to-create-hd-deep-space-nine-using-1833301127

A small community of “digital hoarders” have amassed enormous amounts of data on all kinds of eclectic things (what about preserving human DNA for future resurrection?). I’m sure the vast majority of these hoarders are men. Thanks to their obsessions with highly specific subjects, I wonder if it’s useful to think of these people as “specialized processors” that could someday be optimized for doing relevant types of work as part of something like a Matrix of minds.
https://gizmodo.com/delete-never-the-digital-hoarders-who-collect-tumblrs-1832900423

MySpace just lost 12 years’ worth of user music uploads.
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-47610936

One cost-effective way to upgrade tanks is to remove their old turrets and drop in new ones that have new systems and weapons that can be independent of the rest of the tank’s.
https://www.janes.com/article/87012/eos-elbit-systems-develop-fully-integrated-medium-calibre-turret

Ukraine developed a pretty extensive upgrade package for the T-54 lineage of Soviet tanks (and China’s “T-59” clone). T-54 mass production started in 1950!
http://www.army-guide.com/eng/product1907.html

Vietnam decided to pay a little extra and buy brand-new T-90 tanks from Russia instead of bothering to upgrade its T-59s and T-54s.
https://www.janes.com/article/87529/russia-completes-delivery-of-t-90s-sk-tanks-to-vietnam

The U.S. Army uses a special paint on its armored vehicles that reduces their thermal signature and makes it easier to spray off residues from biochemical weapons.
http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/27088/army-tanks-and-other-vehicles-get-new-paint-jobs-to-help-hide-from-thermal-optics

Electric car engines don’t get nearly as hot as gas-powered engines, so electric tanks would probably have reduced thermal signatures (and be quieter).
https://www.quora.com/Do-the-motors-or-engines-of-fully-electric-cars-get-hot
https://www.quora.com/When-will-we-see-electric-powered-tanks

America’s dream of returning its WWII battleships to service is thwarted by miles of leaky pipes and hoses, and by countless crumbling seals and manifolds. Also, no one remembers how to operate their equipment, so training crews is very slow and expensive (but what if the Navy had intelligent machines that never forgot anything and that would work for free, replacing old pipes, hoses and seals?).
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/i-served-battleship-these-are-all-reasons-they-wont-ever-make-comeback-49322

At last, ISIS has been defeated.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/23/middleeast/isis-caliphate-end-intl/index.html

Venezuela might be finally going full-blown “Planet of the Apes.”
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-47522208

A CIA cargo plane briefly landed in Venezuela and then returned to the U.S.
http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/26951/cia-linked-plane-makes-brief-trip-to-venezuela-as-american-diplomats-evacuate

The U.S. started sending spy planes to loiter off Venezuela’s coast.
https://www.janes.com/article/87205/usaf-begins-surveillance-flights-off-venezuela

Russia has sent troops to Venezuela to back the country’s unpopular socialist government.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/28/europe/russia-venezuela-military-personnel-intl/index.html

Part of why the U.S. military gobbles up so much money is that it is enormously wasteful and can’t keep track of its own assets.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/pentagon-budget-mystery-807276/

The F-35s belonging to the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps have awful readiness levels.
http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/27047/the-navys-operational-f-35c-is-fully-mission-capable-less-than-five-percent-of-time

The F-35 can dangle a baguette-sized device behind it on a long tether that emits signals to jam enemy radars or to simulate the radar signatures of U.S. planes, tricking missiles into colliding with them instead of the parent F-35.
http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/27185/f-35s-most-sinister-capability-are-towed-decoys-that-unreel-from-inside-its-stealthy-skin

The U.S. military has retired the last of its EA-6B electronic warfare planes. The earliest versions of the plane entered U.S. service 56 years ago.
https://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/your-marine-corps/2019/03/08/the-saltiest-warfighter-in-the-marine-corps-the-ea-6b-prowler-retires/

Britain’s RAF has retired the last of its Tornado fighter planes.
http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/26961/the-royal-air-force-has-said-goodbye-to-the-tornado-after-an-amazing-40-year-career

The U.S. Air Force is phasing out the last of its revolvers, which are modifications of a Smith & Wesson design from 1899.
http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/26810/the-usaf-is-finally-ditching-the-last-of-its-cold-war-revolvers-for-new-semi-auto-pistols

Russia’s sophisticated AN-94 rifle is a dud: It’s primary selling point–the “two-shot” feature that could allegedly put two bullets through the same hole, letting it “drill through” NATO bulletproof vests–fell flat in a recent gun range test.
https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2019/03/28/nikonov-an-94-assault-rifle-just-how-accurate-is-its-famed-hyper-burst/

The USS Wasp was a shunk-down version of the larger Yorktown-class WWII aircraft carriers, and it was built smaller to stay within gross warship tonnage limits America agreed to under the Washington Naval Treaty. The Wasp fared badly in the War.
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/uss-wasp-worst-us-navy-aircraft-carrier-world-war-ii-49107

‘The irony is that while battlecruisers [of the World Wars] are gone, they are still with us today. Battlecruisers were eggshells armed with hammers, which exactly describes modern warships.’
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/battlecruiser-scam-why-these-warships-will-never-be-battleship-47877

The SpaceX “Dragon” capsule docked with the ISS and made a safe return to Earth. It could soon be ferrying astronauts in and out of space.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/03/08/homeward-bound-spacex-capsule-headed-splash-down-key-step-toward-human-spaceflight/

India shot down a target satellite, demonstrating the capability for the first time.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/india-shoots-down-satellite-announces-itself-to-be-a-space-power/2019/03/27/a1e73426-5068-11e9-af35-1fb9615010d7_story.html

It’s possible that the “sonic attacks” on U.S. diplomats in Cuba were caused by loud crickets. It’s also possible there were no sonic attacks at all.
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/03/25/704903613/doubts-rise-about-evidence-that-u-s-diplomats-in-cuba-were-attacked

Noisy machines like air conditioners and vacuum cleaners could be encased in special plastic housings that would eliminate almost all of the sounds they make. The casings would be shaped to reflect the sound wave back to their sources to cancel them out.
https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.024302

The bewildering array of different product brands and variations of all kinds of things found for sale on U.S. store shelves are driven by marketing and not by quality differences between them.
https://philip.greenspun.com/blog/2019/03/05/why-arent-all-dishwasher-detergents-the-same/
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/12/dayquil-screed/383768/

While medicinal pills very slowly lose potency, most stay safe and effective for years past their expiration dates.
https://www.livescience.com/65052-why-do-medicines-have-expiration-dates.html

After years of delays and legal challenges, a company has gained FDA approval to sell genetically engineered salmon in the U.S. There’s no scientific evidence that genetically engineered foods are less safe for people to eat than “natural” foods.
https://apnews.com/1be7085378684f4990e240870e7c546c

CRISPR might allow us to control which sexes of farm animals are born, which could massively reduce the number of animals killed per year.
https://www.wired.com/story/crispr-gene-editing-humane-livestock/

Here’s a good breakdown of recent junk science stories that dominated the headlines thanks to their shock value:
http://www.rationaloptimist.com/blog/a-surge-in-pseudoscience/

The “Miracle on the Hudson” plane incident might have ended in disaster had it not been for the plane’s computer overriding some of the pilots commands.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-unsung-hero-left-out-of-sully

Richard Feynman’s “Imagination in a straitjacket” comment perfectly accords with my Rule for Good Futurism #6: “Be very skeptical of predictions that hinge on future discoveries that fundamentally change the laws of science.”
https://youtu.be/IFBtlZfwEwM

Though electric cars still have higher up-front costs than gas-powered cars, some electric car models have lower lifetime costs because electricity is cheaper than gas and they need less maintenance. (The purchase cost gap should vanish by 2026.)
https://qz.com/1571956/new-york-city-says-electric-cars-cheapest-option-for-its-fleet/

Why flying cars never took off and probably never will

Flying cars have been a part of the popular imagination since the 1960s, maybe earlier.

Ah, flying cars, a staple of science fiction since The Jetsons, how I hate thee. Let me count the ways…

First, let’s define what we’re talking about: A “flying car” is a vehicle that can fly through the air like an aircraft AND ALSO drive on roads like an ordinary car. Thus, though it might take off and land vertically like a helicopter, a flying car is different from a helicopter because it can also move long distances on the ground.

In theory, flying cars would be more versatile than land-only cars and air-only aircraft, but their dual-role nature would impose design compromises that would make them far less efficient than either of the other two. For example, a flying car’s wings would be useless dead weight and bulk when the vehicle was driving on roads, and its wheels and transmission would be useless dead weight and would produce major drag when the vehicle was flying through. As a general rule, flying cars would be heavier, slower and less fuel efficient in the air compared to small aircraft, and more prone to breakdowns, less safe, and less fuel efficient on the ground compared to normal cars. 

The Jetsons aired in 1962, and popularized the idea that there would be flying cars in the future.

Without getting into any more detail, we can say that flying cars are a flawed concept, and there’s no reason why this shouldn’t have been obvious to engineers in the 1960s (or earlier) when The Jetsons aired and implanted in the popular consciousness the idea that flying cars would be common in the future. Unfortunately, none of those engineers spoke up (or maybe they did, but they were ignored), and flying cars went unchallenged. I think it’s unfortunate that so many works of science fiction featured flying cars, as they created an unattainable expectation in the minds of millions of people, which has led to predictable disappointment with the way things actually turned out and helped to prop up the false arguments of cynics and declinists. Peter Thiel’s famous quote aptly expresses this misguided disillusionment: “We wanted flying cars, instead we got 140 characters.”

I don’t like flying cars because their failure to appear by the deadlines set by works like Blade Runner is often held up as proof that technology is not improving and our lives aren’t getting better with time. As a student of history, I know that is badly wrong. I also don’t like them because they’re examples of bad futurism–They’re a future technology that sounds superficially cool, but that can also be shot full of holes by any reasonably smart person who spends a few minutes thinking about it critically, as I’ll now do in detail.

Using a thought experiment to build a hypothetical “flying car” from existing technology puts the problems in stark relief. Let’s start with a classic, reliable small plane–the two-seater Cessna 150–and mod it to be a flying car. The first problem we run into is that the wheels at the ends of their three landing gear aren’t connected to the engine by a transmission, meaning the pilot can’t make the wheels spin like he could in a car. Instead, pilots do ground taxiing by increasing the power to their engines, and the spinning of the propellers or jet blades pull the aircraft forward, just as they do when the plane is up in the air. Steering on the ground is done through differential braking of the wheels, and at higher ground speeds, through use of the rudder. While this is fine for traveling a few hundred meters from an airport hangar to a runway, it’s grossly unsuited for driving on roads with normal car traffic.

The iconic and frighteningly small Cessna 150.

We have to add a transmission that connects the Cessna’s engine to at least one of the plane’s wheels, and we also have to add some kind of mechanism to the engine that can disconnect it from the propeller when the craft is in “ground mode.” After all, driving down a residential street with a loud, spinning propeller at the front of your vehicle is obviously unsafe to pedestrians and would violate noise ordinances. We also need to add a feature that makes the wings fold up at the push of a button so the plane can be narrow enough to drive on standard roads. Installing the transmission, disconnector, and swivel mechanism adds weight, cost, and mechanical complexity to the Cessna.

Small planes can have folding wings for more compact storage. Our hypothetical flying car would need an automatic fold ability to make itself narrow enough to drive on roads.

So now, we’re ready. You put your modded Cessna 150 into “ground mode” and take it out for a spin. After a few minutes, you realize it’s the worst car you’ve ever driven. Your engine is literally five times louder than the cars around you and you’re constantly getting stares and seeing pedestrians around you covering their ears. Your “flying car” handles worse than a loaded dump truck (poor acceleration, wide turning radius, very mushy steering), struggles to reach highway speeds, and gets awful mileage. Finally, its small wheels and lack of a suspension system ensure every pothole and small rock on the road jolts your spine up into the base of your skull.

Though the vehicle folds up its wings at the push of a button to make itself narrow enough for you to drive on the road, it can’t shorten its 24 foot length, which dwarfs massive road-only vehicles like Chevy Suburbans (ONLY 18.5 feet long) and gives you a huge turning radius. But paradoxically, your Cessna 150 flying car doesn’t have any more interior space than an ultra-compact Smart Car: There are just two front seats and enough cargo space in the back for a full load of groceries. The ride is cramped and uncomfortable, you can’t use the flying car to transport any kind of big cargo, like a piece of lumber from Home Depot that you need for a simple home improvement project, and it can’t be an all-purpose family vehicle if there are more than three people in your household.

And worse yet, when you decide to forget that stressful experience by switching the Cessna to “air mode” and taking to the skies for a fun ride, you notice the plane is much slower, less maneuverable, and can’t travel as far on the same amount of fuel as before. All the mods you added to the plane to make it better at driving on roads have weighed it down, and it suffers in flight. Other small planes designed exclusively for air travel zip by you.

If this sounds like a sucky thought experiment so far, realize it actually gets worse. Your modded Cessna 150 would need more mods to meet car safety laws, like airbags, bumpers, and crumple zones, all of which add more weight, cost, and complexity. Granted, if this thought experiment is set in the distant future and car accidents have become very rare thanks to autonomous drive systems, it’s possible that some safety feature laws will be eased or eliminated. But not all of them, and for sure your Cessna would need more mods.

And as a person with discerning tastes, you’d doubtless want to install bigger wheels and a suspension system under your craft so every drive to the local store didn’t feel like mountain biking over a jagged rock trail. Which means–you got it–even more weight, cost and complexity.

After finally transforming your super-modded Cessna 150 so it drives as well as a low-quality car, to your horror, you discover that it has become so heavy and non-aerodynamic that it can barely take off into the air anymore! Maybe it can’t fly at all! Uh-oh! And now to fix THAT problem, you have to do a totally different set of mods…and you see where this is going.

Put simply, aircraft and land vehicles have totally different sets of role requirements, and making a “flying car” that can do both forces major design compromises, and it will never be as good in either role as specialized craft. This is true regardless of whether the flying car has wings like a small plane, or rotors like a helicopter.

Speaking of that, I forgot to mention that another limitation of your modded Cessna is that it will only be able to take off from long runways. Unless you are part of the ~2% of the population that lives on a large plot of flat land in the countryside, this means you’ll have to drive to an airport every time you want to go flying. The extra time spent driving your Cessna flying car to and from airports will be an inconvenience, and will actually make it faster to use ground driving mode to travel short- and even mid-distances.

But if your flying car were instead based on a two-seat Robinson R22 helicopter, you’d be able to get around that problem and take off from your suburban backyard, or from the roof of your apartment building, right?

Kinda…maybe…sometimes.

The Robinson R22–another classic

This brings us to two very important but overlooked problems with VTOL-based flying cars: noise and downdraft. Helicopters are very loud, and it would violate noise ordinances and cause people hearing damage if helicopters routinely landed and took off in their neighborhoods. Helicopters can be made quieter by giving them things like exotic main rotor blades, and cowlings around their tail rotors, but these design features are very expensive and only reduce noise levels by a few percent. Rumors that the U.S. military has top-secret “silent helicopters” are unsubstantiated, and I doubt it’s even possible to make helicopters that are “quiet enough” to land in your suburban backyard without jolting your neighbors out of bed. If big chunks of spinning metal are slicing through the air at hundreds of miles per hour, it will make a lot of noise no matter what. 

But even if very quiet helicopters could be made, the next show-stopping problem is downwash. A helicopter is able to go up because its main rotors blow air down at the ground with enough force to overcome the force that gravity is exerting on the helicopter. During takeoffs and landings, when helicopters are flying low to the ground, the downwash can be strong enough to blow over nearby lawn furniture, break tree branches off, blow off roof shingles, kick up big clouds of dust from the ground, and blow small pieces of debris like pebbles around at high speed. The attendant risk of injuries and property damage will ensure that it stays illegal for people to have personal helipads in their suburban backyards. 

We can calculate an R22’s downwash by using this equation: 

The data for the R22 can be found here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robinson_R22

In spite of the fact that our hypothetical R22 is modded with a transmission going to its wheels, an engine-rotor disconnector mechanism, auto-folding rotors, air bags, and all kinds of other stuff to make it roadworthy, I’ll be really nice and say that thanks to use of futuristic weight-saving materials, its overall mass (including passenger[s]) is just 1,200 lbs. That yields a downwash of 22.5 ft/sec, but unfortunately, it’s actually worse than that:

“Keep in mind that this speed [derived from the equation] is at the rotor disk. As the column of air is forced down below the rotor, it constricts, much like molasses being poured out of a pitcher does. In doing so, it reaches its maximum velocity at 1.5 — 2 rotor diameters below the disc.”
https://www.rotorandwing.com/2011/11/29/calculating-rotor-downwash-velocity/

So our “R22 flying car” produces a downwash of 45 ft/sec, which is 30.6 mph. That’s not hurricane-force, but it’s strong enough to kick up clouds of dust, blow common objects over, and hurl pebble-sized debris into a nearby bystander’s eye with enough force to send him to the hospital. If the approach route to your backyard helipad requires you to fly low over someone else’s house or any sort of public space, then the clock will be ticking on someone suing you. So unless you have a very large yard that you’re willing to build a helipad in the middle of, forget it. While we can debate what the pace and direction of technological and scientific development will be in the future, there is no debate that people will continue getting more litigious and fussy with time. Someone will sue you because your flying car is too loud, or because it hurt them by blowing debris at them (even if the claim is a lie).

This helicopter’s downwash is evident by looking at the grass beneath it.
The dust cloud beneath this Harrier jet also reveals the power of its downwash. The Harrier doesn’t have a main rotor like a helicopter, but it still hovers the same way: by blowing vapor at the ground.

Let me insert an important caveat, which I first noted in my Starship Troopers movie review: The noise and downwash of VTOL flying cars are only problematic if we assume they’re to be used in a future world full of humans. If, on the other hand, we assume the future will be populated by machines and not humans, then noise and downdraft won’t be obstacles at all since machines won’t have finicky senses or frail bodies that can get hurt by little pieces of high-velocity debris. It might also be possible to reduce some safety features in aircraft intended for machines that have bodies that are more durable than ours. However, it’s also likely that machines will be very rational and won’t have the same problems we do planning their actions in advance, so from a resource usage standpoint, they would rarely use flying cars as it would be too wasteful a means of transportation. Traditional vehicles like boats, railcars, and big trucks will remain cheaper ways to transport cargo than aircraft.

And if you’re wondering whether we could avoid these problems by inventing some kind of anti-gravity or gravity-cancelling device that flying cars could use to go up and down with blowing air at the ground or needing long runways, realize that such technology is impossible because it violates the laws of science. Our understanding of how the force of gravity works provides no avenue for it to be controlled in such ways (and even if it were possible, it might require impossibly large amounts of energy). If your craft is heavier-than-air, and if you want it to do controlled flight, you either 1) need to give it wings and an engine so it can take advantage of lift, or 2) need to give it a downward-facing fan or rocket nozzle to blow vapor down hard enough to overpower gravity. Those are the only options.

Cars that can silently hover in the air without blasting some kind of vapor at the ground are impossible.

Finally, in “ground mode,” our “R22 flying car” would have the same inefficiencies and problems as the “Cessna 150 flying car,” such as poor performance and handling, excessive length but deficient interior space compared to ground-only vehicles, etc.

The British “Merlin” helicopter can fold its main rotor and its tail to reduce its overall length, but it is still quite long. An R22 with these features would still have a “folded up” length comparable to a full-size SUV, but less interior space than an ultra-compact car.

Another problem is that the standards for “airworthiness” are much more stringent than the standards for “roadworthiness,” so minor damage from something like backing your flying car into a concrete pillar in a parking garage, or having your side window broken by your neighbor’s kid throwing around a baseball in his yard will ground the vehicle until it is inspected and fixed. Flying cars would surely have advanced and extensive internal diagnostic systems to detect such problems, and they will refuse commands to take to the air if there were even a minuscule chance of in-flight mechanical failure. This means the autonomous drive systems would have to be almost totally perfect to ensure even the slightest accidents never happened. And even if that technology existed, you’d have no way to stop vandals or reckless people from disabling your flying car’s ability to fly by inflicting small amounts of damage on it. The availability of “flight mode” would not be reliable, and you’d always be at risk of getting stranded hundreds of miles from home after flying there and then suffering minor damage to the vehicle.

Bad weather will also keep flying cars grounded much of the time–just as is already the case for small aircraft–undercutting them as reliable means of daily transportation. Since piloting a small aircraft is very hard and dangerous, it’s unrealistic to expect a large fraction of the population to learn how to fly flying cars, so the vehicles will need to have advanced autopilot computers. For legal liability reasons, the computers would be programmed to fly very cautiously, and they would refuse to take off if there were even a small chance of hitting bad weather. Unless you are lucky enough to live in a part of the world with very mild, unchanging climate, this means your flying car will only be able to take to the air in fits and starts, preventing you from creating a daily lifestyle organized around the ability to fly from one place to another. This throws a monkey wrench into visions of a future where we all live on big estates in the countryside where land is cheap, and fly into the big city each day for work (also, why not just telework?).

Of course, even if you were assured of a safe landing, you probably wouldn’t want to fly a small aircraft through bad weather, since by virtue of their size, small planes and helicopters suffer worse turbulence than the big passenger planes most people fly on. Being flung around the inside of the cabin by every shifting gust of wind is upsetting for most people, and enduring that while also knowing your life is in the hands of a computer autopilot would be unbearable for a great many (this feeling of not being in control disproportionately frightens humans for complex psychological reasons). Most people can barely muster the courage to climb a ladder to clean their house gutters, let alone fly in a small aircraft. Fear of flying will be a big obstacle to flying cars, and an even bigger obstacle to flying motorcycles and personal jetpacks.

I’m still not done! Flying cars also make no sense for short-distance transportation, like moving around your own town or city. The extra time spent getting to cruising altitude and then landing would make it faster to just stay on the ground and use the roads. The fuel costs of vertical takeoffs and landings also would also be much too high to justify short-distance trips that could be done cheaper and (almost) as quickly with land-only vehicles. These problems both get worse if you assume lots of people in your town or city have flying cars, since that would lead to the equivalent of traffic jams in the sky, and you’d have to fly slower and hover while you waited for a helipad space to open at your destination.

Flying cars also wouldn’t make sense for long-distance transportation over intercontinental or even cross-continental distances, because their fuel tanks wouldn’t be big enough for the journey, and because taking a traditional passenger plane would be much cheaper and faster. Consider that the Boeing 787-900 at full 362-seat capacity gets 87 miles per gallon of fuel, per passenger (https://paullaherty.com/2012/05/25/boeing-737-vs-toyota-prius-this-might-surprise-you/). In comparison, a Cessna 150 gets about 44, and a Robinson R22 gets about 22 miles per gallon of fuel, per passenger. A Boeing 787-900 also flies at 560 mph while the Cessna 150 and R22 fly at 122 and 110 mph, respectively, so the big passenger plane will get you to your destination much faster.

Cessna 150 spec sheet from which I derived the 44 mpg-per-passenger figure.
R22 spec sheet from the Robinson website from which I derived the 22 mpg-per-passenger figure.

This leaves sporadic mid-range travel, which I’ll define as trips between 100 and 400 miles in length, as the one transit niche where it might make sense to use a flying car. But how many people need to frequently travel such distances? If you live in a metro area (including suburbs and exurbs), you’ll be able to satisfy the vast majority of your recreational and social needs without having to travel more than 100 miles from home. And as I established earlier, if you work far from home, it would be a much better idea to telework from your house instead of flying to and from your office building every day (and in any case, at random intervals, bad weather would block you from flying to work, so you couldn’t rely on it).

Flying cars would definitely make it easier to take vacations to the farther-flung parts of your geographic region. As a resident of greater Washington, DC, if I had a flying car, I would go to New York City and the beach more often each summer since both would be quick day trips, negating the need to stay overnight and pay high hotel rates. I would also explore southeastern Canada, and go to my favorite Appalachian hiking spots more, but all of this would only translate into a few extra weekend trips per year. Like most adults, I have responsibilities that often keep me pinned down, and sometimes I’m just too lazy to leave town even when I technically could. If I had a flying car, most of the time I’d be using it in “ground mode” for short-distance trips, and would be griping over its poor performance, uncomfortable ride, and limited utility. I’d probably be better off saving money by just sticking to a ground-only car and accepting a reduced ability to go to New York and the beach.

The counterargument, which is “Just keep your normal car for everyday road travel, and buy a flying car for sporadic regional travel,” makes me realize that there is a different transit model that is better than the “one flying car per person” model shown in many sci-fi movies: What if we don’t build any flying cars at all, and instead build a dense network of airstrips and helipads that people could quickly and cheaply travel through using autonomous, rentable, “air-only” aircraft? What if we paired this with an autonomous carsharing model that would quickly move people to and from those helipads and airstrips? Such an arrangement would provide all the advantages of the “one flying car per person” model without any of the downsides.

For trips in and around your metro area, you would rent self-driving Uber cars that would stay on the ground. Since most (or all) of the other cars on the roads would also be autonomous, they would precisely coordinate traffic flows, meaning there would almost never be accidents or congestion. Cars would traverse the roads much faster than they do today. Additionally, since these vehicles would be designed solely for ground use, they would be optimized for that role and would be safe, fuel efficient, and comfortable inside.

If your job were far from your home, you would telework by using technologies that already exist, or, if that were inadequate for some reason, by using virtual reality technologies that will exist in the near future. The amount of energy required to power your teleworking equipment would be much less than what would be required to fly to your work site each day in a small aircraft or flying car, and if you teleworked, you wouldn’t lose any time at all commuting.

On the rare occasions when you wanted to go somewhere outside your metro area but within 400 miles–let’s say to meet with a very important client at the office building you normally telework to, or to take a weekend trip to the beach or a different city–you would have one of the self-driving Uber cars you normally use take you to the nearest airstrip or helipad. Assume this scenario is happening a few decades from now, and your country has invested money during the interim increasing the number and density of airstrips and helipads, so most of your citizens live within a 20-minute drive of one. They are typically sited just outside of towns or in industrial areas so no one is close enough to hear the sounds of the aircraft landing and taking off. It’s also very common for large buildings to have rooftop helipads.

Your self-driving Uber car takes you to the local helipad or airstrip, where you exit and walk a short distance to a waiting self-driving Uber helicopter or plane. Since the aircraft is a two-seater, and either you’re traveling alone or with only one other person, you don’t have to waste time going through a security check: You can’t take over the aircraft in flight since there are no manual controls and can’t do significant damage by blowing it up. The small aircraft flies you to the airstrip or helipad closest to your destination, and when you disembark, there is a second self-driving Uber car waiting for you nearby. Moreover, since the small aircraft is designed only for flight, it is totally optimized for that role, and is much more fuel efficient than a dual-role “flying car” would be.

Alternatively, we might use high-speed, autonomous Uber cars for 100 – 400 mile trips. The cars would be very streamlined and low to the ground for optimal performance at, say 100 mph. They wouldn’t be much slower than small aircraft for many journeys, and would be safer and possibly cheaper for passengers. If all of the cars on the roads were driven by machines networked to each other, then high-speed cars like this could safely share the roads with slower cars.

Cars designed to spend most of their time driving at high speeds could ferry people over mid-distances.

And finally, if you needed to quickly travel more than 400 miles, you would have a self-driving Uber car take you to the nearest big airport, where you’d disembark and go through the same process that exists today to board a large passenger plane.

In conclusion, I think flying cars are a flawed concept; it’s unfortunate that they’ve appeared so much in science fiction and created an unrealistic vision of the future for many people; and a transit model based around autonomous small aircraft, networks of helipads and small airstrips near population centers, and autonomous road-only vehicles ferrying people to and from the helipads and airstrips would be better than giving everyone a flying car. Moreover, I think the speed and efficiency of ground transportation could be greatly improved by autonomous cars, negating the need for flying cars to move people around cities that have bad road congestion today, and also opening the door to rapid ground transit across mid-distances. While flying cars and small aircraft can be redesigned to reduce their noise signatures (for instance, by using electric engines and installing helicopter tail rotor cowlings), it’s probably impossible to make them quiet enough to land and takeoff in densely populated areas without disturbing people to the point that they take legal action. I also think flying cars would be more feasible in world full of intelligent robots but no humans, but still wouldn’t replace older modes of transit.

Links:

  1. http://www.cessna150152.com/faqs/performance.htm
  2. https://paullaherty.com/2012/05/25/boeing-737-vs-toyota-prius-this-might-surprise-you/
  3. https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/hospital/heliport/heliport.html
  4. https://www.rotorandwing.com/2012/02/01/leading-edge-quiet-please/
  5. https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/150_5390_2c.pdf

Roundup of interesting articles, February 2019

An advanced image-editing program converts simple doodles to realistic alterations of human faces.

The bank analyst who correctly predicted that Bitcoin would massively gain value over the course of 2017 then went on to predict it would keep rising to $50,000 to $100,000 by the end of 2018. (The actual price on December 31, 2018 was $3,691)
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/16/bitcoin-headed-to-100000-in-2018-analyst-who-forecast-2017-price-move.html

Two geologists who predicted 2018 would have abnormally high earthquake activity were also wrong.
https://qz.com/1133304/as-earths-rotation-slows-2018-could-see-a-spike-in-large-earthquakes/

A rare Nextbigfuture.com article that I think is worth reposting (even though I still can’t fully understand it).
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2019/02/the-end-of-moores-law-in-detail-and-starting-a-new-golden-age.html

Unless a human is mentally focused on something, the human might not be displaying general intelligence.
https://srconstantin.wordpress.com/2019/02/25/humans-who-are-not-concentrating-are-not-general-intelligences/

Airbus is discontinuing its monstrous A380 passenger plane due to lack of sales. I remember when it was introduced with great fanfare. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bradtempleton/2019/02/15/lesson-from-the-a380-and-california-hsr-smaller-is-better-in-transportation/#29c6c055d56d

UltraViolet–the massive digital movie library company–is shutting down.
https://variety.com/2019/digital/news/ultraviolet-shutting-down-1203123898/

President Trump says he wants “6G technology in the United States as soon as possible.” This is a fanciful statement, since 5G hasn’t even entered widespread use, and no one has even started hammering out a technical definition of what “6G” would be.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/02/21/trump-says-he-wants-g-even-g-wireless-tech-what-is-g/

Holographic TVs need 10,000 times as much data as 2D TVs. Only an advanced 5G broadband network could support that.
https://www.electronicworldtv.co.uk/blog/holographic-tvs-a-possibility-in-the-next-decade

The guy who invented the world’s first augmented reality contact lenses thinks they won’t be mature, commercially available technology until 2035.
https://www.inverse.com/article/31034-augmented-reality-contact-lenses

Another of my predictions has come true (early): Samsung has unveiled a “foldable” smartphone.
https://www.theverge.com/2019/2/20/18231249/samsung-galaxy-fold-folding-phone-features-screen-photos-size-announcement

Why buy a tiny house when you can buy this?
http://thedrive.com/the-war-zone/26599/this-containerized-missile-launcher-could-give-almost-any-ship-short-range-air-defenses

A shipping container full of Russia’s advanced S-400 missiles might have fallen over the side of a cargo ship on its way to China, and could be sitting on the ocean floor somewhere. If it knew the location, the U.S. could probably recover it.
http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/26540/is-a-batch-of-russias-most-advanced-surface-to-air-missiles-sitting-on-the-sea-floor

For years, the U.S. Air Force used Area 51 to analyze captured Soviet and Chinese fighter planes.
http://thedrive.com/the-war-zone/26372/usaf-mini-documentary-takes-you-behind-the-scenes-of-its-top-secret-cold-war-mig-squadron

According to an internal Kremlin analysis, China’s level of military technology will grow to match Russia’s within ten years.
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2018-09-24/why-russia-and-china-are-strengthening-security-ties

The sad saga of Russia’s aircraft carrier continues. It turns out China doesn’t want to help fix it, after all.
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/russias-only-aircraft-carrier-serious-trouble-43157

‘This combination of un-manned sea travel — plus a complex, remotely-managed rocket launch — is a clear demonstration of what’s to come. China’s successful test heralds a new era of at-a-distance robotics: with applications in defense, search + rescue, exploration, off-shore drilling, ocean fleet management, environmental protection, and a variety of command-and-control systems.’
http://www.kurzweilai.net/digest-ship-without-sailors-worlds-first-weather-rocket-launch-from-robotic-vessel

An autonomous U.S. Navy ship did a test cruise from San Diego to Hawaii and back.
http://thedrive.com/the-war-zone/26319/usns-sea-hunter-drone-ship-has-sailed-autonomously-to-hawaii-and-back-amid-talk-of-new-roles

The wreckage of the USS Hornet–the last U.S. aircraft carrier to be sunk in combat–was found at the bottom of the Pacific. Construction started on the ship in September 1939, and it was sunk in October 1942.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/uss-hornet-wreckage-world-war-two-warship-discovered/

China tested a new submarine-launched nuclear missile, whose range is long enough to let Chinese subs strike targets deep inside North America from the safety of the Pacific.
https://thediplomat.com/2018/12/china-conducts-first-test-of-new-jl-3-submarine-launched-ballistic-missile/

Coalition of the Unwilling: America’s allies have refused to take over the job of policing Syria if U.S. troops leave. This sort of thanklessness only strengthens U.S. isolationists.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/allies-say-they-wont-remain-in-syria-after-us-troops-withdraw/2019/02/20/62e503b2-3532-11e9-a400-e481bf264fdc_story.html

When the history of WWIII is written, surely it shall be said that the extra 100 men from North Macedonia are what tipped the balance to NATO.
https://www.janes.com/article/86205/nato-signs-macedonian-accession-protocol

Hungary is finally selling off its Soviet-era MiG-29s, moving NATO that much closer to weapon interoperability.
https://www.janes.com/article/86269/hungarian-mod-looks-to-sell-off-decommissioned-mig-29s

In the 1980s, Israel developed an upgraded F-4 Phantom fighter plane that could supercruise thanks to lighter, more advanced engines. https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/1980s-israel-developed-heavy-hammer-f-4-super-phantom-what-happened-44702

The sad case of a young woman who died and then had her family ignore her wishes to be cryopreserved should impel us to change the pertinent laws. In absence of any legal changes, I think a person could ensure compliance by writing a will that disinherited any next of kin who obstructed their wishes to be frozen.
https://qz.com/1555363/cryogenics-is-facing-legal-trouble-with-body-preservation/

A scientific team at the renowned Salk Institute used a CRISPR gene therapy to significantly slow down aging in mice. It boosted their lifespans by 25%. If there were a pill that could extend your life by just five years, how much would you pay for it?
https://www.salk.edu/news-release/putting-the-brakes-on-aging/

Not only is obesity partly genetic, but so is the distribution of fat within a person’s body. This has implications for aesthetics and health, since storing too much fat in the hips and around visceral organs heightens the risks of many serious disorders, including heart attacks and diabetes.
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2019-02-dna-variants-significantly-body-fat.html

Furthermore, South Asians (and to a lesser extent, East Asians) have a genetic predisposition to store body fat in their livers, abdomens and muscles, raising their risk of diabetes and heart disease compared to other races.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/12/well/live/why-do-south-asians-have-such-high-rates-of-heart-disease.html

If the NHS offered free genomic sequencing to everyone in Britain, there might be a positive ROI since many people would have genetic diseases caught in their early phases, when effective treatment is relatively cheap and easy.
http://infoproc.blogspot.com/2019/02/precision-genomic-medicine-and-uk.html

Scientists have made stable DNA strands composed of the four natural nucleotide bases along with four synthetic ones. Such engineered strands would be more “information dense” than normal DNA strands, and could have medical uses.
https://www.livescience.com/64829-hachimoji-dna.html

Computer simulations of chemical reactions are getting more accurate thanks to Moore’s Law and better algorithms. In a recent study, millions of “virtual reactions” between random chemical combinations were run, and a respectable number of them were verified as correct through real-world duplications of those experiments.
https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2019/02/11/virtual-screening-as-big-as-it-currently-gets

A startup company backed by Bill Gates is trying to build a tiny “tele-operated robo-surgeon” that human surgeons would remotely control through an interface that made them feel like they were the size of a rat.
http://social.techcrunch.com/2019/02/13/bill-gates-backed-vicarious-surgical-adds-a-virtual-reality-twist-to-robots-in-the-operating-room/

A new study strengthens a belief I’ve had for a while: The utility that people gain from leisure time is subject to the law of diminishing returns, and actually becomes negative past a certain amount. This casts doubt on the notion that a post-scarcity future world where machines did all the work and humans had endless free time would be utopian.
https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2019/02/free-time-life-satisfaction/583171/

Two baseball players looked so alike that they took a DNA test to see if they were related (they weren’t). With so many photos of so many people available on the internet, it won’t be long before you can use an app to find all of your doppelgangers. https://www.foxnews.com/sports/two-similar-looking-baseball-players-take-dna-tests-to-prove-whether-they-are-related

An advanced image-editing program has been invented that converts simple doodles to realistic alterations of human faces.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.06838.pdf

A Tweet worth considering. I call this the “Technological Unemployment Tipping Point,” and I also think that rather than trying to guess which career field you should aim for, it will someday make sense to just ask the machines which jobs align the best with your skills and interests, and will not become obsolete soon. (You might not like the answer.)

Texas is now producing more oil than ever before. The “Good Old Days” are back, yet strangely muted.
http://www.tipro.org/newsroom/tipro-news/tipro-releases-state-of-energy-report-1

BP predicts that renewable energy sources (wind, solar, geothermal, and biomass) will produce the biggest share of the world’s energy (and not just electricity) by 2040. Coal will have the second biggest share, and will have precipitously declined in popularity from today.
https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/energy-outlook/demand-by-sector/power.html

The number of buildings in the world will double by 2060 to accommodate a bigger and richer human population. An enormous amount of CO2 will be emitted thanks to all that construction.
https://www.gatesnotes.com/2019-Annual-Letter

The share of the Earth’s surface covered in green plants actually increased from 2000 to 2017. Much of that owes to China’s state-directed “Great Green Wall” tree-planting project.
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2019/02/14/694202210/you-may-be-surprised-to-learn-which-two-countries-are-making-the-globe-a-lot-gre

While some insect populations are shrinking, the problem is probably being overblown by alarmist people with their own agendas.
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/02/insect-apocalypse-really-upon-us/583018/

The brine produced at desalination plants could be processed to make valuable chemicals and to capture valuable bits of metal dissolved in seawater.
https://phys.org/news/2019-02-desalination-resource.html

What would life be like on a tidally-locked but habitable planet? 1) Probably sucky, 2) Everyone would have blackout curtains, and 3) There wouldn’t be different time zones.
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/02/space-colonies-on-tidally-locked-planets/582661/

Richard Branson says he will fly into space on his own craft on the 50th anniversary of the Apollo 11 Moon landing.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-6682257/Richard-Branson-says-hell-fly-space-July.html

Jeff Bezos thinks there will someday be 1 trillion humans living in our Solar System.
https://www.businessinsider.com/jeff-bezos-blue-origin-wings-club-presentation-transcript-2019-2

‘The Lunar Library™ represents the first in a series of lunar archives from the Arch Mission Foundation, designed to preserve the records of our civilization for up to billions of years. It is installed in the SpaceIL “Beresheet” lunar lander, scheduled to land on the Moon in April of 2019…[it] contains a 30 million page archive of human history and civilization, covering all subjects, cultures, nations, languages, genres, and time periods. ‘
https://www.archmission.org/spaceil

A successful experiment to harpoon a piece of space junk raises hope that the cloud of manmade debris around Earth could someday be removed. https://apnews.com/066f28f2c2d04fd89ec15f7d43c99d88

After recovering from a serious head injury, this guy found he had acquired a talent for playing the piano. Very advanced brain surgeries and stimulative brain implants could someday enhance peoples’ intelligence, mental skills, and alter their personalities.
https://denver.cbslocal.com/2019/02/10/derek-amato-acquired-savant-syndrome-piano/

Home delivery of groceries is expensive (and hence, less popular that deliveries of everything else) because care must be taken to keep perishable groceries at the right temperature and to properly handle delicate foods, like bags of chips.
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2019/02/online-grocery-shopping-has-been-slow-catch/581911/

By 2025, there will be 261 different car models that don’t run on gasoline–triple today’s figure. In 2011, there were only three such models.
https://www.npr.org/2019/02/16/694303169/as-more-electric-cars-arrive-whats-the-future-for-gas-powered-engines

If app-based carsharing in Moscow is any indication, it’s a win-win for nearly everyone.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-uber-lyft-automakers-russia-20190211-story.html

1:1 virtual simulations of cities would really help city planners.https://www.bbc.com/news/business-46880468

Electric planes by 2030?

I came across an interesting podcast interview by Aviation Weekly, in which two aerospace industry analysts discuss progress in building electric planes, and make predictions about the future of the niche. Here’s a list of their key points:

  • There is a strong, long-term trend for aircraft to have more electronics, and fewer mechanical components like hydraulics. The Boeing 787 is the pinnacle of this.
  • Even though gas-powered planes get more fuel-efficient each year, the total number of plane flights is growing so fast that, by 2050, 10% of global CO2 emissions will come from planes. As time passes, public pressure will grow to reduce aircraft emissions. Logically, this will help the electric plane industry since they are less polluting than gas-powered planes.
  • A stumbling block will be the disparity between the stated and revealed preferences of customers: While most people claim to care about global warming and claim they’d be willing to pay extra money to avert it, they might not actually be willing to pay more to fly on a low-emission electric jet. [Consider how people today harshly complain about the small seats, bad food, and nickle-and-diming common on regional airlines, yet they aggressively demand low ticket prices and don’t want to pay more money for better service.] Electric planes will be more expensive than gas-powered planes for decades to come.
  • As with cars, there are two basic types of electric aircraft: all-electric and hybrid-electric. Many new technologies from the auto sector are crossing over into the aircraft sector, so the electrification of cars today yields insight into the future of planes.
  • A big difference is that plane engines require ~100x as much power output as car engines. Low battery weight is also much more crucial for planes, and is the primary impediment to their development. Electric planes will only become feasible once a battery with 500 watt-hours per kg is created [for comparison, a Tesla Model 3’s batteries are 207 Wh/kg]. Even that would be an order of magnitude less energy dense than jet fuel.
  • While advances in battery technology are unpredictable and happen in fits and starts, long-term trends suggest that a 500 Wh/kg battery will be invented around 2030.
  • Small planes that traverse short-distance routes will be electrified first. Large planes designed for long-distance routes won’t be electrified until the energy density of batteries equals that of jet fuel. The lag time will be decades long.
  • The number of experimental electric aircraft is rapidly growing. Most of the prototypes and their corresponding startup companies will fail.
  • $15-20 billion would be needed to develop a large, all-electric passenger plane. Due to the high cost, today’s electric plane startups are focusing on making small planes.
  • Electric aircraft could demand very different architectures from gas-powered aircraft. For example, large electric aircraft wouldn’t have fuselage-wing layouts. [The pundit doesn’t elaborate, but the default alternative is the flying wing layout.]
  • In 20-30 years, the aerospace industry could look very different.
  • To meet the energy demands of electric planes recharging their batteries on the ground, airports would have to be massively upgraded with power infrastructure. [In addition, if the planes had different layouts like flying wings, the airport terminals themselves would need to be rebuilt to accommodate the planes.]
  • China could seize the global lead in electric aircraft. The country has the technological expertise to make advanced electrical components and batteries, it lacks an established aerospace industry that would politically resist plane electrification in order to protect investments in legacy fleets of gas-powered aircraft, and its government supports any high-tech innovation that could lead to leadership in some industry.
  • “Subregional,” inter-city plane flights might get much cheaper. Electric, short-takeoff-and-landing (STOL) aircraft could use airstrips close to city centers in the future. This would pose a big challenge to inter-city rail networks.

Finally, let me cite one of my personal predictions, from my big post:

[By the end of the 2070s] It will be technologically and financially feasible for commercial aircraft to produce zero net carbon emissions. The aircraft might use conventional engines powered by synthetic fossil fuels, or they might have electric engines and very energy-dense batteries or fuel cells.

Links:

  1. http://aviationweek.com/future-aerospace/podcast-how-electric-propulsion-will-shock-aerospace-industry
  2. https://insideevs.com/tesla-claims-model-3-battery-has-highest-energy-density-of-any-electric-car/

Roundup of interesting articles, January 2019

This chart of how prices of various goods and services have changed over the last 20 years in the U.S. shows the impact of Moore’s Law, trade, private sector competition (or lack thereof), and government regulation.
https://www.aei.org/publication/chart-of-the-day-or-century/

Here’s an interesting article on how changes in technology have altered our houses over time.
https://www.curbed.com/2019/1/16/18184194/mcmansion-hell-kate-wagner-modern-building-materials

At CES 2019, LG unveiled a 65″ TV that is only 3mm thick and can roll up like a carpet. It costs tens of thousands of dollars, but serves as a crucial proof of concept. Someday, average people will own wall-sized TVs that are paper-thin and 8K in resolution.
https://ces2019.lgusnewsroom.com/press-release/lg-debuts-tv-of-tomorrow-with-worlds-first-rollable-oled-tv/

The U.S. cancer death rate has been declining for 25 consecutive years. It mostly owes to people quitting smoking, and would be even lower if it weren’t for a rise in obesity-induced cancers.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-46822429

Only 14% of Americans were smokers in 2017, the lowest ever. Smoking is more common among poor people, blacks, and Hispanics, partly explaining their lower lifespans.
https://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-smoking-reduction-benefits-20190107-story.html

A new deep learning AI called “DeepGestalt” can scan images of human faces for the telltale signs of over 200 genetic disorders like Down Syndrome.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-018-0279-0

There’s evidence that primitive human societies become less violent by killing off violent males and/or refusing to let them breed. Impulsive behavior–which can lead to violence–has a heritable, genetic component, and measurable changes to a human genepool can happen after just three generations of consistent natural selection.
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/03/how-humans-tamed-themselves/580447/

Scientists genetically engineered mice so they only gave birth to females. If successfully applied to farm animals, the technique could lower the cost of meat and avert the extermination of billions of male animals per year. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/515064v2

Agricultural scientists used genetic engineering to make tobacco plants that grew much faster and larger thanks to more efficient photosynthesis. It might someday massively boost farm productivity, providing more food for the human population.
https://foundationfar.org/2019/01/03/scientists-engineer-shortcut-for-photosynthetic-glitch-boost-crop-growth-by-40-percent/

Bird lungs are more efficient at respiration than mammal lungs. With radically advanced genetic engineering, could we make humans that looked no different on the outside, but had bird lungs on the inside?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2662944/

“Juice,” a popular dog that has appeared in many Chinese films, has been cloned by his owner to ensure the money keeps flowing after the original dog dies. https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/world-news/753111/china-celebrity-dog-juice-cloned-cloning-experiment-pets

“Juice” alongside his younger clone.

Human fingerprints are partly heritable.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/are-ones-fingerprints-sim/

The Russian BMP-3 armored vehicle can be fitted with a powerful, rapid-fire 57mm gun, which could destroy light and medium armored vehicles and also aircraft.
https://defence-blog.com/army/uralvagonzavod-shows-bmp-3-ifv-57mm-gun.html

Twenty years after joining NATO, Hungary is finally getting rid of its Soviet-era rifles and handguns and is buying new ones that use the same bullets as the West.
https://www.janes.com/article/85372/hungarian-defence-forces-receive-cz-bren-2-rifles

“Draken International” is a private military contractor that owns over 150 military jets, principally meant to be aggressor squadrons in air force training. http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/25927/check-out-cockpit-in-draken-internationals-private-mirage-f-1m-aggressor-jet

The U.S. military was thinking about building the kinds of stealth helicopters used in the 2011 bin Laden raid as early as 1978.
http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/25890/origins-of-stealth-black-hawks-date-back-over-33-years-before-the-bin-laden-raid

Yemeni rebels flew small UAV into a group of government soldiers and detonated it, killing six. It’s useful to think of these sorts of weapons as small guided missiles, which illuminates the fact that their use is just part of the decades-long trend for the technology to get smaller and cheaper. Small groups of people can now afford them.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-46822429

The nearly-forgotten Russo-Japanese War of 1904-05 was the first instance when two, modern armies equipped with machine guns clashed, and old infantry tactics were shown to be terribly vulnerable to the weapons. Unfortunately, few generals heeded the war’s lessons, and the same mistakes were made ten years later in WWI. http://weaponsman.com/?p=23151

Passive sonar operators on U.S. subs sometimes hear noises underwater that don’t match with natural or manmade phenomena.
http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/25784/what-u-s-submariners-actually-say-about-detection-of-so-called-unidentified-submerged-objects

After the U.S. started building a Space Shuttle, Soviet scientists and economists correctly determined that NASA’s claims the Shuttle would launch cargo into orbit cheaper than rockets were false, and in fact, it would cost more. This led the Soviets to conclude that the Shuttle in fact had a clandestine military purpose, and they found it could serve as a very high-speed nuclear bomber and that it could snatch Soviet spy satellites in orbit. The Soviets didn’t consider that Shuttle in fact had no military function, but that the U.S. government would waste billions of dollars chasing an unattainable goal (but we did).
https://youzicha.tumblr.com/post/181657051514/my-favorite-part-about-the-economically-dubious

China landed a rover on the dark side of the Moon and did an experiment where it sprouted seeds in a sealed container full of soil, demonstrating that crop plants can be grown on the Moon.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-46873526

The Large Hadron Collider has a 16.6 mile circumference. Europe and China now have competing plans to build particle colliders with 62 mile circumferences.
https://gizmodo.com/plans-revealed-for-enormous-particle-collider-in-china-1830444169/

A brain-computer interface (e.g. – a skullcap embedded with electrodes that monitor the wearer’s brain activity) was used to decipher spoken words a person was hearing based on their brain waves.
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/350124v2

My future predictions (2019 iteration)

If it’s January, it means it’s time for me to update my big list of future predictions! I used the 2018 version of this document as a template, and made edits to it as needed. For the sake of transparency, I’ve indicated recently added content by bolding it, and have indicated deleted or moved content with strikethrough.

Like any futurist worth his salt, I’m going to put my credibility on the line by publishing a list of my future predictions. I won’t modify or delete this particular blog entry once it is published, and if my thinking about anything on the list changes, I’ll instead create a new, revised blog entry. Furthermore, as the deadlines for my predictions pass, I’ll reexamine them.

I’ve broken down my predictions by the decade. Any prediction listed under a specific decade will happen by the end of that decade, unless I specify some other date (e.g. – “X will happen early in this decade.”).

2020s

  • Better, cheaper solar panels and batteries (for grid power storage and cars) will make clean energy as cheap and as reliable as fossil fuel power for entire regions of the world, including some temperate zones. As cost “tipping points” are reached, it will make financial sense for tens of millions of private homeowners and electricity utility companies to install solar panels on their rooftops and on ground installations, respectively. This will be the case even after government clean energy subsidies are inevitably retracted. However, a 100% transition to clean energy won’t finish in rich countries until the middle of the century, and poor countries will use dirty energy well into the second half of the century.
  • Fracking and the exploitation of tar sands in the U.S. and Canada will together ensure growth in global oil production until around 2030, at which time the installed base of clean energy and batteries will be big enough to take up the slack. There will be no global energy crisis.
  • Foldable smartphones will enter mass production, though it’s uncertain how much the market will embrace them. These phones will have one, rigid screen on their “front cover,” and one, flexible screen that is twice as big spanning their inner space.
  • Improvements to smartphone cameras, mirrorless cameras, and perhaps light-field cameras will make D-SLRs obsolete. 
  • Vastly improved VR goggles with better graphics and no need to be plugged into desktop PCs will hit the market. They won’t display perfectly lifelike footage, but they will be much better than what we have today, and portable. Augmented reality (AR) glasses that are much cheaper and better than the original Google Glass will also make their market debuts.
  • “Full-immersion” audiovisual VR will be commercially available by the end of the decade. They will be capable of displaying video that is visually indistinguishable from real reality: They will have display resolutions, refresh rates, head tracking sensitivities, and wide fields of view that together deliver a visual experience that matches or exceeds the limits of human vision. The goggles won’t be truly “portable” devices because their high processing and energy requirements will probably make them bulky, give them only a few hours of battery life, or even require them to be plugged into another computer. Moreover, the tactile, olfactory, and physical movement/interaction aspects of the experience will remain underdeveloped.
  • LED light bulbs will become as cheap as CFL and even incandescent bulbs. It won’t make economic sense NOT to buy LEDs, and they will establish market dominance.
  • “Smart home”/”Wired home” technology will become mature and widespread in developed countries.
  • Video gaming will dispense with physical media, and games will be completely streamed from the internet or digitally downloaded. Business that exist just to sell game discs (Gamestop) will shut down.
  • Instead of a typical home entertainment system having a whole bunch of media discs, different media players and cable boxes, there will be one small, multipurpose box that, among other things, boosts WiFi to ensure the TV and all nearby devices can get signals at multi-Gb/s speeds.
  • Self-driving vehicles will start hitting the roads in large numbers in rich countries. The vehicles won’t drive as efficiently as humans (a lot of hesitation and slowing down for little or no reason), but they’ll be as safe as human drivers. Long-haul trucks that ply simple highway routes will be the first category of vehicles to be fully automated. The transition will be heralded by a big company like Wal-Mart buying 5,000 self-driving tractor trailers to move goods between its distribution centers and stores. Last-mile delivery–involving weaving through side streets, cities and neighborhoods, and physically carrying packages to peoples’ doors–won’t be automated until after this decade. Self-driving, privately owned passenger cars will stay few in number and will be owned by technophiles, rich people, and taxi cab companies.
  • Thanks to improvements in battery energy density and cost, and in fast-charging technology, electric cars become cost-competitive with gas-powered cars this decade without government subsidies, leading to their rapid adoption. Electric cars are mechanically simpler and more reliable than gas-powered ones, which will hurt the car repair industry. Many gas stations will also go bankrupt or convert to fast charging stations. [Moved from the 2030s because I discovered the technologies are improving faster than I thought.]
  • Quality of life for people living and working in cities and near highways will improve as more drivers switch to quieter, emissionless electric vehicles. 
  • A machine will pass the Turing Test by the end of this decade. The milestone will attract enormous amounts of attention and will lead to several retests, some of which the machine will fail, proving that it lacks the full range of human intelligence. It will lead to debate over the Turing Test’s validity as a measure of true intelligence (Ray Kurzweil actually talked about this phenomenon of “moving the goalposts” whenever we think about how smart computers are), and many AI experts will point out the existence of decades-long skepticism in the Turing Test in their community.
  • The best AIs circa 2029 won’t be able to understand and upgrade their own source codes. They will still be narrow AIs, albeit an order of magnitude better than the ones we have today.
  • Machines will become better than humans at the vast majority of computer, card, and board games. The only exceptions will be very obscure games or recently created games that no one has bothered to program an AI to play yet. But even for those games, there will be AIs with general intelligence and learning abilities that will be “good enough” to play as well as average humans by reading the instruction manuals and teaching themselves through simulated self-play.
  • The cost of getting your genome sequenced and expertly interpreted will drop below $1,000, and enough about the human genome will have been deciphered to make the cost worth the benefit for everyone. By the end of the decade, it will be common for newborns in rich countries to have their genomes sequenced.
  • Cheap DNA tests that can measure a person’s innate IQ and core personality traits with high accuracy will become widely available. There is the potential for this to cause social problems. 
  • At-home medical testing kits and diagnostic devices like swallowable camera-pills will become vastly better and more common.
  • China’s GDP will surpass America’s, India’s population will surpass China’s, and China will never claim the glorious title of being both the richest and most populous country.
  • Space tourism will become routine thanks to privately owned spacecraft. 
  • Marijuana will be effectively decriminalized in the U.S. Either the federal government will overturn its marijuana prohibitions, or some patchwork of state and federal bans will remain but be so weakened and lightly enforced that there will be no real government barriers to obtaining and using marijuana. 
  • By the end of this decade, photos of almost every living person will be available online (mostly on social media). Apps will exist that can scan through trillions of photos to find your doppelgangers. 
  • Drones will be used in an attempted or successful assassination of at least one major world leader (Note: Venezuela’s Nicholas Maduro wasn’t high profile enough).

2030s

  • VR and AR goggles will become refined technologies and probably merge into a single type of lightweight device. Like smartphones today, anyone who wants the glasses in 2030 will have them. Even poor people in Africa will be able to buy them. A set of the glasses will last a day on a single charge under normal use.  
  • Augmented reality contact lenses will be invented, though they won’t be as good as AR glasses and they might need remotely linked, body-worn hardware to provide them with power and data.
  • The bulky V.R. goggles of the 2020s will transform into lightweight, portable V.R. glasses thanks to improved technology. The glasses will display lifelike footage. 
  • Wall-sized, thin, 8K or even 16K TVs will become common in homes in rich countries, and the TVs will be able to display 3D picture without the use of glasses. A sort of virtual reality chamber could be created at moderate cost by installing those TVs on all the walls of a room to create a single, wraparound screen.
  • The video game industry will be bigger than ever and considered high art.
  • Books and computer tablets will merge into a single type of device that could be thought of as a “digital book.” It will be a book with several hundred pages made of thin, flexible digital displays (perhaps using ultra-energy efficient e-ink) instead of paper. At the tap of a button, the text on all of the pages will instantly change to display whichever book the user wanted to read at that moment. They could also be used as notebooks in which the user could hand write or draw things with a stylus, which would be saved as image or text files. The devices will fuse the tactile appeal of old-fashioned books with the content flexibility of tablet computers.
  • Loneliness, social isolation, and other problems caused by overuse of technology and the atomized structure of modern life will be, ironically, cured to a large extent by technology. Chatbots that can hold friendly (and even funny and amusing) conversations with humans for extended periods, diagnose and treat mental illnesses as well as human therapists, and customize themselves to meet the needs of humans will become ubiquitous. The AIs will become adept at analyzing human personalities and matching lonely people with friends and lovers, and at recommending daily activities that will satisfy them, hour-by-hour. Machines will come to understand that constant technology use is antithetical to human nature, so in order to promote human wellness, they find ways to impel humans to get out of their houses, interact with other humans, and be in nature.
  • House robots will start becoming common in rich countries. They will be slower at doing household tasks than humans, but will still save people hours of labor per week. They may or may not be humanoid. For the sake of safety and minimizing annoyance, most robots will do their work when humans aren’t around. As in, you would come home from work every day and find the floors vacuumed, the lawn mowed, and your laundered clothes in your dresser, with nary a robot in sight since it will have gone back into its closet to recharge. You would never hear the commotion of a clothes washing machine, a vacuum cleaner or a lawnmower. All the work would get done when you were away, as if by magic.
  • Chatbots will steadily improve their “humanness” over the decade. The instances when AIs say or do something nonsensical will get less and less frequent. Dumber people, children, and people with some types of mental illness will be the first ones to start insisting their AIs are intelligent like humans. Later, average people will start claiming the same. By the end of the decade, a personal assistant AI like “Samantha” from the movie Her will be commercially available.
  • People will start having genuine personal relationships with AIs and robots. For example, people will resist upgrading to new personal assistant AIs because they will have emotional attachments to their old ones. The destruction of a helper robot or AI might be as emotionally traumatic to some people as the death of a human relative.
  • Thanks to improvements in battery energy density and cost, and in fast-charging technology, electric cars become cost-competitive with gas-powered cars this decade without government subsidies, leading to their rapid adoption. Electric cars are mechanically simpler and more reliable than gas-powered ones, which will hurt the car repair industry. Many gas stations will also go bankrupt or convert to fast charging stations. [Moved to the 2020s because I discovered the technologies are improving faster than I thought.]
  • Self-driving cars will become cheap enough and practical enough for average income people to buy, and their driving behavior will become as efficient as an average human. Over the course of this decade, there will be rapid adoption of self-driving cars in rich countries. Freed from driving, people will switch to doing things like watching movies/TV and eating. Car interiors will change accordingly. Road fatalities, and the concomitant demands for traffic police, paramedics, E.R. doctors, car mechanics, and lawyers will sharply decrease. The car insurance industry will shrivel, forcing consolidation. (Humans in those occupations will also face increasing levels of direct job competition from machines over the course of the decade.)
  • The “big box” business model will start taking over the transportation and car repair industry thanks to the rise of electric, self-driving vehicles and autonomous taxis in place of personal car ownership. The multitudes of small, scattered car repair shops will be replaced by large, centralized car repair facilities that themselves resemble factory assembly lines. Self-driving vehicles will drive to them to have their problems diagnosed and fixed, sparing their human owners from having to waste their time sitting in waiting rooms.
  • Car ownership won’t die out because it will still be a status symbol, and having a car ready in your driveway will always be more convenient than having to wait even just two minutes for an Uber cab to arrive at the curb. People are lazy.
  • The ad hoc car rental model exemplified by autonomous Uber cabs and private people renting out their autonomous cars when not in use faces a challenge since daily demand for cars peaks during morning rush hour and afternoon rush hour. In other words, everyone needs a car at the same time each day, so the ratio of cars : people can’t deviate much from, say, 1:2. Of course, if more people telecommuted (almost certain in the future thanks to better VR, faster broadband, and tech-savvy Millennials reaching middle age and taking over the workplace), and if flexible schedules became more widespread (also likely, but within certain limits since most offices can’t function efficiently unless they have “all hands on deck” for at least a few hours each day), the ratio could go even lower. However, there’s still a bottom limit to how few cars a country will need to provide adequate daily transportation for its people.
  • Automation will start having a major impact on the global economy. Machines will compensate for the shrinkage of the working-age human population in the developed world. Countries with “graying” populations like Japan and Germany will experience a new wave of economic growth. Demand for immigrant laborers will decrease across the world because of machines.
  • There will be a worldwide increase in the structural unemployment rate thanks to better and cheaper narrow AIs and robots. A plausible scenario would be for the U.S. unemployment rate to be 10%–which was last the case at the nadir of the Great Recession–but for every other economic indicator to be strong. The clear message would be that human labor is becoming decoupled from the economy.
  • Combining all the best AI and robotics technologies, it will be possible to create general-purpose androids that could function better in the real world (e.g. – perform in the workplace, learn new things, interact with humans, navigate public spaces, manage personal affairs) than the bottom 10% of humans (e.g. – elderly people, the disabled, criminals, the mentally ill, people with poor language abilities or low IQs), and in some narrow domains, the androids will be superhuman (e.g. – physical strength, memory, math abilities). Note that businesses will still find it better to employ task-specific, non-human-looking robots instead of general purpose androids.
  • By the end of this decade, only poor people, lazy people, and conspiracy theorists (like anti-vaxxers) won’t have their genomes sequenced. It will be trivially cheap, and in fact free for many people (some socialized health care systems will fully subsidize it), and enough will be known about the human genome to make it worthwhile to have the information.
  • Markets will become brutally competitive and efficient thanks to AIs. Companies will sharply grasp consumer demand through real-time surveillance, and consumers will be alerted to bargains by their personal AIs and devices (e.g. – your AR glasses will visually highlight good deals as you walk through the aisles of a store). Your personal assistant AIs and robots will look out for your self-interest by countering the efforts of other AIs to sway your spending habits in ways that benefit companies and not you.
  • “Digital immortality” will become possible for average people. Personal assistant AIs, robot servants, and other monitoring devices will be able, through observation alone, to create highly accurate personality profiles of individual humans, and to anticipate their behavior with high fidelity. Voices and mannerisms will be digitally reproducible without any hint of error. Digital simulacra of individual humans will be further refined by having them take voluntary personality tests, and by uploading their genomes, brain scans and other body scans. Even if all of the genetic and biological data couldn’t be made sense of at the moment it was uploaded to an individual’s digital profile, there will be value in saving it since it might be decipherable in the future.
  • Life expectancy will have increased by a few years thanks to pills and therapies that slightly extend human lifespan. Like, you take a $20 pill each day starting at age 20 and you end up dying at age 87 instead of age 84.
  • Global oil consumption will peak as people continue switching to other power sources.
  • Earliest possible date for the first manned Mars mission.
  • Movie subtitles and the very notion of there being “foreign language films” will become obsolete. Computers will be able to perfectly translate any human language into another, to create perfect digital imitations of any human voice, and to automatically apply CGI so that the mouth movements of people in video footage matches the translated words they’re speaking.
  • Computer will also be able to automatically enhance old films by accurately colorizing them, removing defects like scratches, and sharpening or focusing footage (one technique will involve interpolating high-res still photos of long-dead actors onto the faces of those same actors in low-res moving footage). Computer enhancement will be so good that we’ll be able to watch films from the early 20th century with near-perfect image and audio clarity.
  • CGI will get so refined than moviegoers with 20/20 vision won’t be able to see the difference between footage of unaltered human actors and footage of 100% CGI actors.
  • Lifelike CGI and “performance capture” will enable “digital resurrections” of dead actors. Computers will be able to scan through every scrap of footage with, say, John Wayne in it, and to produce a perfect CGI simulacrum of him that even speaks with his natural voice, and it will be seamlessly inserted into future movies. Elderly actors might also license movie studios to create and use digital simulacra of their younger selves in new movies. The results will be very fascinating, but might also worsen Hollywood’s problem with making formulaic content.

2040s

  • The world and peoples’ outlooks and priorities will be very different than they were in 2019. Cheap renewable energy will have become widespread and totally negated any worries about an “energy crisis” ever happening, except in exotic, hypothetical scenarios about the distant future. There will be little need for immigration thanks to machine labor and cross-border telecommuting. Moreover, there will be a strong sense in most Western countries that they’re already “diverse enough,” and that there are no further cultural benefits to letting in more foreigners since large communities of most foreign ethnic groups will already exist within their borders. There will be more need than ever for strong social safety nets and entitlement programs thanks to technological unemployment. AI will be a central political and social issue. It won’t be the borderline sci-fi, fringe issue it was in 2019.
  • Automation, mass unemployment, wealth inequalities between the owners of capital and everyone else, and differential access to expensive human augmentation technologies (such as genetic engineering) will produce overwhelming political pressure for some kind of wealth redistribution and social safety net expansion. Countries that have diligently made small, additive reforms as necessary over the preceding decades will be untroubled. However, countries that failed to adapt their political and economic systems will face upheaval.
  • 2045 will pass without the Technological Singularity happening. Ray Kurzweil will either celebrate his 97th birthday in a wheelchair, or as a popsicle frozen at the Alcor Foundation.
  • Supercomputers that match or surpass upper-level estimates of the human brain’s computational capabilities will cost a few hundred thousand to a few million dollars apiece, meaning tech companies and universities will be able to afford large numbers of them for AI R&D projects, accelerating progress in the field. Hardware will no longer be the limiting factor to building AGI. If it hasn’t been built yet, it will be due to failure to figure out how to arrange the hardware in the right way to support intelligent thought, and/or to a failure to develop the necessary software. 
  • With robots running the economy, it will be common for businesses to operate 24/7: restaurants will never close, online orders made at 3:00 am will be packed in boxes by 3:10 am, and autonomous delivery trucks will only stop to refuel or exchange cargo.
  • Advanced energy technology, robot servants, 3D printers, telepresence, and other technologies will allow people to live largely “off-grid” if they choose, while still enjoying a level of comfort that 2019 people would envy.
  • It will be common for cities, towns and states to heavily restrict or ban human-driven vehicles within their boundaries. A sea change in thinking happens as autonomous cars become accepted as “the norm,” and human-driven cars are thought of as unusual and dangerous.
  • Over 90% of new car sales in developed countries will be for electric vehicles. Just as the invention of the automobile transformed horses into status goods used for leisure, the rise of electric vehicles will transform internal combustion vehicles into a niche market for richer people. 
  • A global “family tree” showing how all humans are related will be built using written genealogical records and genomic data from the billions of people who have had their DNA sequenced. It will become impossible to hide illegitimate children, and it will also become possible for people to find “genetic doppelgangers”–other people they have no familial relationship to, but with whom, by some coincidence, they share a very large number of genes. 
  • Improved knowledge of human genetics and its relevance to personality traits and interests will strengthen AI’s ability to match humans with friends, lovers, and careers.  
  • Realistic robot sex bots that can move and talk will exist.

2050s

  • This is the earliest possible time that AGI/SAI will be invented. It will not be able to instantly change everything in the world or to initiate a Singularity, but it will rapidly grow in intelligence, wealth, and power. It will probably be preceded by successful computer simulations of the brains of progressively more complex model organisms, such as flatworms, fruit flies, and lab rats.
  • Humans will be heavily dependent upon their machines for almost everything (e.g. – friendship, planning the day, random questions to be answered, career advice, legal counseling, medical checkups, driving cars), and the dependency will be so ingrained that humans will reflexively assume that “The Machines are always right.” Consciously and unconsciously, people will yield more and more of their decision-making and opinion-forming to machines, and find that they and the world writ large are better off for it.
  • In the developed world, less than 50% of people between age 22 and 65 will have gainful full-time jobs. However, unprofitable full-time jobs that only persist thanks to government subsidies (such as someone running a small coffee shop and paying the bills with their monthly UBI check) and full-time volunteer “jobs” (such as picking up trash in the neighborhood) are counted, most people in that age cohort will be “doing stuff” on a full-time basis.  
  • The doomsaying about Global Warming will start to quiet down as the world’s transition to clean energy hits full stride and predictions about catastrophes from people like Al Gore fail to pan out by their deadlines. Sadly, people will just switch to worrying about and arguing about some new set of doomsday prophecies about something else.
  • By almost all measures, standards of living will be better in 2050 than today. People will commonly have all types of wonderful consumer devices and appliances that we can’t even fathom. However, some narrow aspects of daily life are likely to worsen, such as overcrowding and further erosion of the human character. Just as people today have short memories and take too many things for granted, so shall people in the 2050s fail to appreciate how much the standard of living has risen since today, and they will ignore all the steady triumphs humanity has made over its problems, and by default, people will still believe the world is constantly on the verge of collapsing and that things are always getting worse.
  • Cheap desalination will provide humanity with unlimited amounts of drinking water and end the prospect of “water wars.” 
  • Mass surveillance and ubiquitous technology will have minimized violent crime and property crime in developed countries: It will be almost impossible to commit such crimes without a surveillance camera or some other type of sensor detecting the act, or without some device recording the criminal’s presence in the area at the time of the act. House robots will contribute by effectively standing guard over your property at night while you sleep. 
  • It will be common for people to have health monitoring devices on and inside of their bodies that continuously track things like their heart rate, blood pressure, respiration rate, and gene expression. If a person has a health emergency or appears likely to have one, his or her devices will send out a distress signal alerting EMS and nearby random citizens. If you walked up to such a person while wearing AR glasses, you would see their vital statistics and would receive instructions on how to assist them (i.e. – How to do CPR). Robots will also be able to render medical aid. 
  • Cities and their suburbs across the world will have experienced massive growth since 2019. Telepresence, relatively easy off-grid living, and technological unemployment will not, on balance, have driven more people out of metro areas than have migrated into them. Farming areas full of flat, boring land will have been depopulated, and many farms will be 100% automated. The people who choose to leave the metro areas for the “wilderness” will concentrate in rural areas (including national parks) where the climate is good, the natural scenery is nice, and there are opportunities for outdoor recreation.
  • Therapeutic cloning and stem cell therapies will become useful and will effectively extend human lifespan. For example, a 70-year-old with a failing heart will be able to have a new one grown in a lab using his own DNA, and then implanted into his chest to replace the failing original organ. The new heart will be equivalent to what he had when at age 18 years, so it will last another 52 years before it too fails. In a sense, this will represent age reversal to one part of his body.
  • The first healthy clone of an adult human is born.
  • Many factories, farms, and supply chains will be 100% automated, and it will be common for goods to not be touched by a human being’s hands until they reach their buyers. Robots will deliver Amazon packages to your doorstep and even carry them into your house. Items ordered off the internet will appear inside your house a few hours later, as if by magic. 
  • The last of America’s Cold War-era weapon platforms (e.g. – the B-52 bomber, F-15 fighter, M1 Abrams tank, Nimitz aircraft carrier) will finally be retired from service. There will be instances where four generations of people from the same military family served on the same type of plane or ship. 
  • Cheap guided bullets, which can make midair course changes and be fired out of conventional man-portable rifles, will become common in advanced armies. 
  • The richest person alive achieves a $1 trillion net worth.

2060s

  • China will effectively close the technological, military, and standard of living gaps with other developed countries. Aside from the unpleasantness of being a more crowded place, life in China won’t be worse overall than life in Japan or the average European country.
  • House robots and human-sized worker robots will be as strong, agile, and dexterous as most humans, and their batteries will be energy-dense enough to power them for most of the day. A typical American family might have multiple robot servants that physically follow around the humans each day to help with tasks. The family members will also be continuously monitored and “followed” by A.I.s embedded in their portable personal computing devices and possibly in their bodies. 
  • Cheap home delivery of groceries, robot chefs, and a vast trove of free online recipes will enable people in average households to eat restaurant-quality meals at home every day, at low cost. Predictive algorithms that can appropriately choose new meals for humans based on their known taste preferences and other factors will determine the menu, and many people will face a culinary “satisfaction paradox.”
  • Machines will understand humans individually and at the species level better than humans understand themselves. They will have highly accurate personality models of most humans along with a comprehensive grasp of human sociology, human decision-making, human psychology, human cognitive biases, and human nature, and will pool the information to accurately predict human behavior. A nascent version of a 1:1 computer simulation of the Earth–with the human population modeled in great detail–will be created.
  • There will be a small, permanent human presence on the Moon.
  • If a manned Mars mission hasn’t happened yet, then there’s intense pressure to do so by the centennial of the first Moon landing (1969).
  • The worldwide number of supercentenarians–people who are at least 110 years old–is sharply higher than it was in 2019: Their population size could be 10 times bigger or more. 
  • Advances in a variety of technologies will make it possible to cryonically freeze humans in a manner that doesn’t pulverize their tissue. However, the technology needed to safely thaw them out won’t be invented for decades. 

2070s

  • 100 years after the U.S. “declared war” on cancer, there still will not be a “cure” for most types of cancer, but vaccination, early detection, treatment, and management of cancer will be vastly better, and in countries with modern healthcare systems, most cancer diagnoses will not reduce a person’s life expectancy. Consider that, diabetes and AIDS were once considered “death sentences” that would invariably kill people within a few years of diagnosis, until medicines were developed that transformed them into treatable, chronic health conditions. 
  • It will be technologically and financially feasible for commercial aircraft to produce zero net carbon emissions. The aircraft might use conventional engines powered by synthetic fossil fuels, or they might have electric engines and very energy-dense batteries or fuel cells. 

2100

  • Humans probably won’t be the dominant intelligent life forms on Earth.
  • Latest possible time that AGI/SAI will be invented. By this point, computer hardware will so powerful that we could do 1:1 digital simulations of human brains. If our AI still falls far short of human-like general intelligence and creativity, then it might be that only organic substrates have the necessary properties to support them.
  • Worst case scenario is that AGI/Strong AI hasn’t been invented yet, but thousands of different types of highly efficient, task-specific Narrow AIs have (often coupled to robot bodies), and they fill almost every labor niche better than human workers ever could (“Death by a Thousand Cuts” job automation scenario). Humans grow up in a world where no one has to work, and the notion of drudge work, suffering through a daily commute, and involuntarily waking up at 6:00 am five days a week is unfathomable. Every human will have machines that constantly monitor them or follow them around, and meet practically all their needs.
  • The world could in many ways resemble Ray Kurzweil’s predicted Post-Singularity world. However, the improvements and changes will have accrued thanks to decades of AGI/Strong AI steady effort. Everything will not instantly change on DD/MM/2045 as Kurzweil suggests it will.
  • Hundreds of millions, and possibly billions, of “digitally immortal avatars” of dead humans will exist, and you will be able to interact with them through a variety of means (in FIVR, through devices like earpieces and TV screens, in the real world if the avatar takes over an android body resembling the human it was based on). 
  • A weak sort of immortality will be available thanks to self-cloning, immortal digital avatars, and perhaps mind uploading. You could clone yourself and instruct your digital avatar–which would be a machine programmed with your personality and memories–to raise the clone and ensure it developed to resemble you. Your digital avatar might have an android body or could exist in a disembodied state. 
  • Life expectancy escape velocity and perhaps medical immortality will be achieved. It will come not from magical, all-purpose nanomachines that fix all your body’s cells and DNA, but from a combination of technologies, including therapeutic cloning of human organs, cybernetic replacements for organs and limbs, and stem cell therapies that regenerate ageing tissues and organs inside the patient’s body. The treatments will be affordable in large part thanks to robot doctors and surgeons who work almost for free, and to medical patents expiring.
  • All other aspects of medicine and healthcare will have radically advanced. There will be vaccines and cures for almost all contagious diseases. We will be masters of human genetic engineering and know exactly how to produce people that today represent the top 1% of the human race (holistically combining IQ, genetic health, physical attractiveness, and likable/prosocial personality traits). However, the value of even a genius-IQ human will be questionable since intelligent machines will be so much smarter.
  • Augmentative cybernetics (including direct brain-to-computer links) will exist and be in common use.
  • FIVR exists wherein AI game masters constantly tailor environments, NPCs and events to suit each player’s needs and to keep them entertained. Every human has his own virtual game universe where he’s #1. With no jobs in the real world to occupy them, it’s quite possible that a large fraction of the human race will willingly choose to live in FIVR. (Related to the satisfaction paradox)
  • The vast majority of unaugmented human beings will no longer be assets that can invent things and do useful work: they will be liabilities that do (almost) everything worse than intelligent machines and augmented humans. Ergo, the size of a nation’s human population will subtract from its economic and military power, and radical shifts in geopolitics are possible. Geographically large but sparsely populated countries like Russia, Australia and Canada might become very strong.
    [Changed to reflect the fact that some extraordinarily talented, unaugmented humans like Einstein could still compete with the future “average.”]
  • The transition to green energy sources will be complete, and humans will no longer be net emitters of greenhouse gases. The means will exist to start reducing global temperatures to restore the Earth to its pre-industrial state, but people will resist because they will have gotten used to the warmer climate. People living in Canada and Russia won’t want their countries to get cold again.
  • Synthetic meat will taste no different from animal meat, and will be at least as cheap to make. The raising and/or killing of animals for food will be be illegal in many countries, and trends will clearly show the practice heading for worldwide ban. 
  • The means to radical alter human bodies, alter memories, and alter brain structures will be available.
  • Brain implants will make “telepathy” possible between humans, machines and animals.
  • Flying cars designed to carry humans could be common, but they will be flown by machines, not humans. Ground vehicles will retain many important advantages (fuel efficiency, cargo capacity, safety, noise level, and more) and won’t become obsolete. Instead of flying cars, it’s more likely that there will be millions of small, autonomous helicopters and VTOL aircraft that will cheaply ferry people through dense, national networks of helipads and airstrips. Autonomous land vehicles would take take passengers to and from the landing sites. 
  • The notion of vehicles (e.g. – cars, planes, and boats) polluting the air will be an alien concept. 
  • Advanced nanomachines could exist.
  • Vastly improved materials and routine use of very advanced computer design simulations will mean that manufactured objects of all types will be optimally engineered in every respect, and might seem to have “magical” properties. For example, a car will be made of hundreds of different types of alloys, plastics, and glass, each optimized for a different part of the vehicle, and car recalls will never happen since the vehicles will undergo vast amounts of simulated testing in every conceivable driving condition in 1:1 virtual simulations of the real world. 
  • Relatively cheap interplanetary travel (probably just to Mars and to space stations and moons that are about as far as Mars) will exist.
  • Androids that are outwardly indistinguishable from humans will exist, and humans will hold no advantages over them (e.g. – physical dexterity, fine motor control, appropriateness of facial expressions, capacity for creative thought).
  • Drones, miniaturized smart weapons, and AIs will dominate warfare, from the top level of national strategy down to the simplest act of combat. The world’s strongest military could, with conventional weapons alone, destroy most of the world’s human population in a short period of time. 
  • The construction and daily operation of prisons will have been fully automated, lowering the monetary costs of incarceration. As such, state prosecutors and judges will no longer feel pressure to let accused criminals have plea deals or to give them shorter prison sentences to ease the burdens of prison overcrowding and high overhead costs. 
  • The term “millionaire” will fall out of use in the U.S. and other Western countries since inflation will have rendered $1 million USD only as valuable as $90,000 USD was in 2019 (assuming a constant inflation rate of 3.0%).  

2101 – 2200 AD

  • Humans will definitely stop being the dominant intelligent life forms on Earth. 
  • Many “humans” will be heavily augmented through genetic engineering, other forms of bioengineering, and cybernetics. People who outwardly look like the normal humans of today might actually have extensive internal modifications that give them superhuman abilities. Non-augmented, entirely “natural” humans like people in 2019 will be looked down upon in the same way you might today look at a very low IQ person with sensory impairments. 
  • Physical disabilities and defects of appearance that cause untold anguish to people in 2019 will be easily and cheaply fixable. For example, male-pattern baldness and obesity will be completely ameliorated with minor medical interventions like pills or outpatient surgery. Missing or deformed limbs will be easily replaced, all types of plastic surgery (including sex reassignment) will be vastly better and cheaper than today, and spinal cord damage will be totally repairable. The global “obesity epidemic” will disappear. 
  • The means to halt and reverse human aging will be created. The human population will come to be dominated by people who are eternally young and beautiful. 
  • Humans and machines will be immortal. Intelligent beings will find it terrifying and tragic to contemplate what it was like for humans in the past, who lived their lives knowing they were doomed to deteriorate and die. 
  • Extreme longevity, better reproductive technologies that eliminate the need for a human partner to have children, and robots that do domestic work and provide companionship (including sex) will weaken the institution of marriage more than any time in human history. An indefinite lifetime of monogamy will be impossible for most people to commit to. 
  • Immortality, the automation of work, and widespread material abundance will completely transform lifestyles. With eternity to look forward to, people won’t feel pressured to get as rich as possible as quickly as possible. As stated, marriage will no longer be viewed as a lifetime commitment, and serial monogamy will probably become the norm. Relationships between parents and offspring will change as longevity erases the disparities in generational outlook and maturity that traditionally characterize parent-child interpersonal dynamics (e.g. – 300-year-old dad doesn’t know any better than his 270-year-old son). The “factory model” of public education–defined by conformity, rote memorization, frequent intelligence testing, and curricula structured to serve the needs of the job market–will disappear. The process of education will be custom-tailored to each person in terms of content, pacing, and style of instruction. Students will be much freer to explore subjects that interest them and to pursue those that best match their talents and interests. 
  • Extinct species for which we have DNA samples (ex – from passenger pigeons on display in a museum) will “resurrected” using genetic technology.
  • The technology for safely thawing humans out of cryostasis and returning them to good health will be created. 
  • It will be possible to upload human minds to computers. The uploads will not share the same consciousness as their human progenitors, and will be thought of as “copies.”
  • Gold, silver, and many other “precious metals” will be worth far less than today, adjusting for inflation, because better ways of extracting (including from seawater) them will have been developed. Space mining might also massively boost supplies of the metals, depressing prices. Diamonds will be nearly worthless thanks to better techniques for making them artificially. 
  • The first non-token quantities of minerals derived from asteroid mining will be delivered to the Earth’s surface. (Finding an asteroid that contains valuable minerals, altering its orbit to bring it closer to Earth, and then waiting for it to get here will take decades. No one will become a trillionaire from asteroid mining until well into the 22nd century.)
  • Intelligent life from Earth will colonize the entire Solar System, all dangerous space objects in our System will be found, the means to deflect or destroy them will be created, and intelligent machines will redesign themselves to be immune to the effects of radiation, solar flares, gamma rays, and EMP. As such, natural phenomena (including global warming) will no longer threaten the existence of civilization. Intelligent beings will find it terrifying and tragic to contemplate what it was like for humans in the past, who were confined to Earth and at the mercy of planet-killing disasters. 
  • “End of the World” prophecies will become far less relevant since civilization will have spread beyond Earth and could be indefinitely self-sustaining even if Earth were destroyed. Some conspiracy theorists and religious people would deal with this by moving on to belief in “End of the Solar System” prophecies, but these will be based on extremely tenuous reasoning. 
  • The locus of civilization and power in our Solar System will shift away from Earth. The vast majority of intelligent life forms outside of Earth will be nonhuman. 
  • A self-sustaining, off-world industrial base will be created.
  • Spy satellites with lenses big enough to read license plates and discern facial features will be in Earth orbit. 
  • Space probes made in our Solar System and traveling at sub-light speeds will reach nearby stars.
  • All of the useful knowledge and great works of art that our civilization has produced or discovered could fit into an advanced memory storage device the size of a thumb drive. It will be possible to pair this with something like a self-replicating Von Neumann Probe, creating small, long-lived machines that would know how to rebuild something exactly like our civilization from scratch. Among other data, they would have files on how to build intelligent machines and cloning labs, and files containing the genomes of billions of unique humans and non-human organisms. Such machines could be distributed throughout our Solar System as an “insurance policy” against our extinction, or sent to other star systems to seed them with life. 
  • We will find out whether alien life exists on Mars and the other celestial bodies in our Solar System. 
  • We will reach “Kardashev Type 1 Civilization” status or something equivalent to it. 
  • Intelligent machines will get strong enough to destroy the human race, though it’s impossible to assign odds to whether they’ll choose to do so.
  • If the “Zoo Hypothesis” is right, and if intelligent aliens have decided not to talk to humans until we’ve reached a high level of intellect, ethics, and culture, then the machine-dominated civilization that will exist on Earth this century might be advanced enough to meet their standards. Uncontrollable emotions and impulses, illogical thinking, tribalism, self-destructive behavior, and fear of the unknown will no longer govern individual and group behavior. Aliens could reveal their existence knowing it wouldn’t cause pandemonium. 
  • Technology will be seamlessly fused with humans, other biological organisms, and the environment itself.  
  • A global network of sensors and drones will identify and track every non-microscopic species on the planet. Cryptids like “bigfoot” and the “Loch Ness Monster” will be definitively proven to not exist. The monitoring network will also make it possible to get highly accurate, real-time counts of entire species populations. Mass gathering of DNA samples–either taken directly from organisms or from biological residue they leave behind–will also allow the full genetic diversity of all non-microscopic species to be known. 
  • Robots will clean up all of the garbage created in human history. 
  • Every significant archaeological site will be excavated and every shipwreck found. There will be no work left for people in the antiquities. 
  • Animals will no longer be raised for food. Additionally, the means will exist to cheaply and artificially produce organic products, like wool and wood. 

Roundup of interesting articles, December 2018

Having a navy composed of many, smaller ships is better than a navy composed of a few, big ships because the former can project power over a larger area, and the loss of any particular ship is not so bad.
https://www.navalgazing.net/So-You-Want-to-Build-a-Battleship-Design-Part-2

A scathing analysis of the WWII Imperial Japanese Navy.
https://www.navalgazing.net/Japanese-Battleships-in-World-War-II

Tying together two subjects I’ve repeatedly touched on, Russia has sold China advanced turbine engine components for its Type 055 destroyers in exchange for China agreeing to fix up Russia’s sole aircraft carrier. Recall that the Type 055 is one of China’s best ships and is only slightly inferior to U.S. ships of the same type, and Russia’s military floating dock accidentally sank in October.
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/military/article/2179553/china-makes-turbine-blade-breakthrough-could-give-type-055

Australia’s former aircraft carrier–the Melbourne–was a cursed ship that probably found its most productive use after it was decommissioned, acquired by China under the guise of commercially scrapping it, and then reverse-engineered by their Navy.
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/meet-australian-aircraft-carrier-jump-started-chinas-own-carrier-quest-38387

The U.S. Marines have built a scale-model replica of China’s J-20 stealth fighter.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6478933/US-Air-Force-reveals-owns-scale-replica-cutting-edge-Chinese-stealth-fighter.html

In stark contrast to the U.S., China hasn’t fought a real war since 1979, meaning the vast majority of its soldiers have zero combat experience. There are real advantages to having combat veterans in your military.
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/chinese-military-has-one-weakness-it-cant-fix-no-combat-experience-38952

Slovakia has decided to replace its Soviet-era MiG-29s with U.S.-built F-16s, which moves NATO that much closer to logistical interoperability and reduces some of their members’ highly embarrassing dependence on Russia for military assistance.
https://www.janes.com/article/85204/slovakia-signs-for-f-16v-fighters

There’s a family of WWII enthusiasts in Belarus with my dream job: they raise tanks from swamps and bogs and restore them to working order.
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20180312-the-salvagers-who-raise-world-war-two-tanks-from-the-dead

Brazil just gave Uruguay 25, M41 Walker Bulldog tanks, which are 65 years old.
https://www.janes.com/article/85132/brazil-transfers-m41c-light-tanks-to-uruguayan-army

There are good reasons why no army uses double-barreled tanks, a staple of future military sci-fi: The extra barrel and its breech make the tank heavier and its turret wider in exchange for little benefit.
http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/65875-double-barreled-tanks/

When will we have electric planes? Whenever we have at least tripled the energy density of today’s best batteries. Since energy density doubles roughly every 25 years, a tripling should happen in 38 years. At that point, medium-sized electric passenger planes with up to 125 passengers could profitably ply short- and medium-distance routes.
https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/12/when-will-electric-airliners-make-sense/

Porsche has made a 450 kW fast-charging station for electric cars. There’s no technical reason why a car’s batteries couldn’t be recharged in under 10 minutes, which would eliminate one of the few advantages of gas-powered cars.
https://newatlas.com/porsche-450-kw-fastcharge-prototype/57659/

Electric cars are more expensive than gas-powered cars because the former’s batteries are expensive. However, the costs are rapidly declining, and at the current rate, Bloomberg predicts electric cars should actually get CHEAPER than gas-powered equivalents by 2026. Crucially, this can be done without the discovery of some new type of battery with new chemistry–we’ll find ways to make existing lithium-ion batteries cheaper.
https://data.bloomberglp.com/bnef/sites/14/2017/07/BNEF-Lithium-ion-battery-costs-and-market.pdf

In California, the police pulled over a Tesla on autopilot mode after seeing the driver unconscious at the wheel. This sort of thing can only get more common.
https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-tesla-driver-asleep-20181202-story.html

In another extraordinary coup, SpaceX reused one of its rockets for the THIRD time, and launched a record-breaking payload of 64 satellites.
https://apnews.com/b5adaacf957f49efba481aef2ef55914

Virgin Galactic’s “SpaceShipTwo” did a successful test flight to a 51-mile altitude, which is considered the beginning of space.
https://apnews.com/659f385710cc46fdb381c5f6dfbb6573

Apollo 8 astronaut Bill Anders thinks a Mars mission is a terrible idea, and that NASA has done nothing but make mistakes and grow more bureaucratic over the last 50 years.
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46364179

Secret military bases in Israel and Turkey were found by perusing publicly available satellite images for blurred-out areas. The photos came from a Russian-owned satellite, and apparently they have an agreement with Israel and Turkey, which has inadvertently backfired.
https://fas.org/blogs/security/2018/12/widespread-blurring-of-satellite-images-reveals-secret-facilities/

NASA’s IceSat 2 laser mapping satellite can determine the heights of ground features with +/- 2 cm accuracy.
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46532975

NVIDIA has developed a software program that can synthesize fully realistic photos of human faces belonging to no one.
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/mby4q8/these-people-were-created-by-nvidia-ai

A new machine learning program can quickly make highly realistic computer images based on uploaded photos of real-world objects.
https://techxplore.com/news/2018-12-artificial-intelligence-graphics.html

Once AIs grasp your skills, intelligence, and personality traits, they’ll be able to match you with jobs more optimally than you or a company’s human resources department could. As technological unemployment accelerates, it will be interesting to see what uses machines find for humans (e.g. doctors picking up roadside trash).
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/06/business/economy/artificial-intelligence-hiring.html

Once AIs learn your preferences, they’ll be able to reliably recommend new foods you’ll enjoy, and maybe even make foods perfectly suited to your individual tastes.
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2018/12/gastrograph-flavor-goes-digital/577270/

Kevin Kelly termed that future phenomenon “the Satisfaction Paradox.”
https://kk.org/thetechnium/the-satsisfacti/

Some ancient Greek myths describe what we would today think of as robots.
“If you think about what any reproducing organism that is under natural selection will do,” Martinho-Turswell told me, “it is going to try to maximize the effect it can get from the minimum investment. That is how you win the evolutionary game.”
https://gizmodo.com/the-ancient-origins-of-automation-1830880224

Tokyo Disneyland is building a Beauty and the Beast attraction full of robots that look and move exactly like the animated characters. It’s surreal watching footage of these things.
https://youtu.be/bJtNxaTwgz0

A year ago, the AlphaZero AI taught itself chess with no human help, achieving a superhuman level of skill in 24 hours. Some questioned the legitimacy of the accomplishment, and those critiques have just been refuted by a detailed paper published in Science.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/26/science/chess-artificial-intelligence.html

Russia shows off its Potemkin Robot.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/dec/12/high-tech-robot-at-russia-forum-turns-out-to-be-man-in-robot-suit

Kroger has unveiled an autonomous vehicle meant to delivery groceries to people living near one of their stores. Since it isn’t meant to carry humans, the vehicle is very small, light, and lacks safety features. As autonomous vehicles get more common, the diversity of vehicle shapes and sizes will grow, as they will be purpose-built for specific tasks. In a distant future where AIs run the planet and humans aren’t around, I think smaller volumes of physical “stuff” will move around the planet, and vehicles designed to transport human-sized beings will be a very small fraction of the global vehicle fleet.
https://techxplore.com/news/2018-12-grocery-delivery-humans-drivers-underway.html

The concept of a “space of possible minds” has recently come to fascinate me. The human mind is only one possible type of mind, and it thinks and perceives things in unique, but not objective ways. Other species, like bats, ants, and chimps, have very different internal states that could be appropriately called “alien.” Maybe in the future, we’ll have an enormous number of minds–human, animal, hybrid, artificial, blended organic/synthetic–all linked to the same Matrix (for lack of a better term), with each mind specialized for a different type of processing. As data entered the Matrix, it would be shunted to the type of mind best suited to process it. Some of the nodes might be human brains floating in jars, genetically tweaked to be enormous in size and hyperspecialized for specific types of thinking.
https://www.edge.org/conversation/murray_shanahan-the-space-of-possible-minds

An update to a link I posted some months ago: The NHS has decided to get rid of its ridiculous fax machines.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-46497526

Scene from “Gattaca”

There are now portable machines that can perform DNA fingerprinting in two hours, and the FBI plans to link them to the national criminal DNA database. I’m reminded of the scene from Gattaca where a group of detectives force a random group of people to submit to DNA ID tests in public.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/crime-law/2018/12/13/fbi-plans-rapid-dna-network-quick-database-checks-arrestees/

The full genomes of 100,000 people living in Britain have now been sequenced.
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-46456984

A U.K. study has found there are nine genes coding for red hair in humans. I don’t think red hair will ever disappear from the human genepool, as some have predicted.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-46522679

The first genetically engineered humans probably didn’t gain any beneficial traits. This really is a sad way to start, and I’m glad the geneticist who did this is being punished.
https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2018/11/28/after-such-knowledge

Making use of genetic engineering, advanced organ preservation techniques, and immunosuppresant drugs, scientists successfully transplanted pig hearts into baboons, which survived up to 180 days. Transplant experiments involving humans are next.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/baboons-survive-for-half-a-year-after-heart-transplants-from-pigs/

The tragic man who had volunteered for the first live human head transplant has wisely backed out.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/man-set-worlds-first-head-13748350

Scientists successfully grew hair follicles in vitro, surgically implanted them into mice, and the hair grew. A true cure for human baldness will exist by the end of this century. Eventually, we’ll be able to edit it out of the human genepool. Full heads of hair are attractive, completely shaved heads can also be attractive, but heads covered in visibly thinning or receded hair are universally seen as unattractive.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-07579-y

Twelve people were hospitalized after getting infections from poorly regulated stem cell clinics in the U.S. Stem cell therapies have enormous long-term potential, but at present, the clinical field is dominated by quacks peddling unproven, expensive treatments to desperately ill people.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/20/health/stem-cell-shots-bacteria-fda.html

“Human Genomics Inc.,” a company co-founded in 2013 by biotech luminary J. Craig Venter to apply genetic knowledge to find ways to slow human aging, has lost 80% of its stock value.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/genomics-startup-human-longevitys-valuation-falls-80-1544187724

China’s first pet cloning service has made a copy of one of the country’s best-known dogs, famous for starring in commercials. Dog cloning services have been available in the U.S. and South Korea for years.
https://www.news18.com/news/world/two-of-a-kind-chinas-first-pet-cloning-service-duplicates-star-pooch-1976313.html

A German company has invented a way to safely identify the sexes of chickens while they’re still in their eggs. The eggs with males in them could be pulverized as early as the ninth day, when the chicks are still embryos with undeveloped nervous systems. Currently, the egg industry disposes of 4-6 billion hatched male chicks per year by drowning them or grinding them up in huge machines.
http://www.seleggt.com/supply-chain-of-shell-eggs/

“Domicology recognizes the cyclical nature of the built environment. Ultimately we’re imagining a world where no building has to be demolished. Structures will be designed with the idea that once they reach the end of their usefulness, they can be deconstructed with the valuable components repurposed or recycled.”
http://theconversation.com/domicology-a-new-way-to-fight-blight-before-buildings-are-even-constructed-82582

Machines keep getting better at predicting protein shapes based on their amino acid sequences. The new champ is Google’s Deepmind AI.
https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2018/12/03/the-latest-on-protein-folding

More proof that California’s decision to put out every wildfire–even if no humans or infrastructure are threatened–interferes with nature’s cycle and only increases the amount of dead, dry wood that will serve as fodder for mega-fires. Global warming doesn’t cause every problem.
https://apnews.com/f92cc1767c33459c9312d6fa408cdd50

And here’s more support for my prediction that house robots will reduce wildfire damage in the future.
https://www.npr.org/2018/12/24/678853717/how-houses-themselves-become-fuel-for-wildfires

80-90% of the scientists who have ever lived are alive now. The number of scientists has been growing exponentially since about WWII. And undoubtedly, access to information today is better than ever in human history.
https://futureoflife.org/2015/11/05/90-of-all-the-scientists-that-ever-lived-are-alive-today/

For the first time in human history, fewer than 1 billion people lack electricity.
https://qz.com/1509999/the-number-of-people-without-electricity-fell-below-1-billion-for-the-first-time-ever-in-2018/

China just built perhaps the world’s most advanced nuclear reactor. The design originated in Europe, but various problems have delayed the completion of any of the reactors on that continent. China started building its reactor after the Europeans and has finished years before they will.
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/politics/article/2178099/delayed-still-world-first-new-breed-nuclear-reactor-powers

There’s merit to the saying “What doesn’t kill me makes me stronger”–survivors of the Japanese atomic bombings who received lower doses of radiation actually lived longer than average and had reduced cancer rates.
https://genesenvironment.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s41021-018-0114-3

Alien planets with large numbers of solar panels covering their surfaces would emit characteristic light signatures we could see with the right telescopes.
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/12/tracing-biosignatures-space-find-alien-life/578089/

Syrian government forces have reoccupied the northern city of Manbij for the first time in six years. At last, and for better or worse, the country’ civil war is ending.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-46701095

President Trump has announced U.S. troops will leave Syria. America never got permission from the Syrian government to enter in the first place.
https://www.janes.com/article/85396/us-s-syrian-withdrawal-likely-to-prompt-turkish-backed-operation-targeting-sdf-which-will-seek-pre-emptive-government-deal

General Douglass MacArthur had a truly crazy and dangerous plan for winning the Korean War. I can understand why President Truman fired him. I think MacArthur was an overrated commander who never adapted to the realities of the Postwar era.
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/how-america-could-have-won-the-korean-war-not-north-korea-26307

Alan Watts postulated that, if you were a Godlike being with billions of years on your hands, you would eventually start doing mental exercises where you simulated what it would be like to live as a random human on Earth, with no knowledge of your divine nature. Eventually, you would simulate the person you are now.
https://steemit.com/christianity/@gbolson/alan-watt-s-perfect-description-of-simulation-theory-or-hell

Humans have a natural bias towards pessimism, attach more weight to bad news than to good news, and in surveys usually underestimate how much things have improved in the world, such as the growth of the global middle class.
http://www.rationaloptimist.com/blog/the-persistent-appeal-of-pessimism/

Reflections on “The Third Wave”

As promised, I’ve written my thoughts on Alvin Toffler’s outstanding futurist book, The Third Wave. I finished it in November, but was delayed writing this due to travel.

First, I think Toffler’s vision of the future was mostly correct, but that his timetable for his predictions was too optimistic. Of note is the fact that I’ve long said the same thing about Ray Kurzweil, who is another famous futurist. It now occurs to me that Toffler’s ideas could have in fact influenced Kurzweil’s, as both of them were well-known American futurists from the same part of the country. I’ll keep this mind when I read Kurzweil’s first futurist book, The Age of Intelligent Machines (1990), which was published just ten years after The Third Wave.

Another similarity between the two men is their prediction that undeveloped countries could skip the “Industrial Era” phase of economic, social, and political development and go directly to the “Postmodern Era” characterized by economies based on services, information and science, and cultures centered around personal freedom decentralized government. While it’s a hopeful vision and may someday provide a pathway to real prosperity for poor countries, I think it has failed to materialize so far: some poor countries with underdeveloped manufacturing sectors such as India have gotten richer recently thanks to growth in information jobs and service sector jobs–like telemarketing and computer services–but it’s far too early to say if enough positions will ever be created in those positions to employ most adults or to have a truly “transformative” effect on the nature or size of their economies. Additionally, India has been rapidly urbanizing and will continue doing to for decades, bucking Toffler’s prediction that it might avoid such a population transfer (a development pathway he called “Gandhi with satellites”).

To the contrary, the greatest economic growth miracle of the last 40 years happened in China thanks to a government-led strategy to rapidly industrialize and build enormous numbers of factories. China didn’t skip the Industrial Era (aka “The Second Wave”), it aggressively embraced it, and today, it’s the world’s largest manufacturer of goods. China’s success also presents a rival model of national development to Toffler’s “Third Wave”: a competent, efficient, technocratic dictatorship that provides prosperity but limited freedom. Of note, the recent book How Democracy Ends explores the possible decline of liberal democracy theorizes the rise of a benevolent AI dictatorship that humans accept because it is simply better than any other system (could that be “The Fourth Wave”?).

It’s interesting to examine the minority of Toffler’s predictions that have already failed or seem likely to fail, and to consider the reasons why. For starters, Toffler predicted that fossil fuel supplies would steadily dwindle into the future, exacerbating the civil strife that he thought would accompany the transition to the Third Wave, and accelerating the development of clean energy technologies. At the time he wrote Future Shock, inflation-adjusted oil prices were the highest they had been in the 20th century thanks to the Arab Oil Embargo and to disruptions to Iranian oil exports owing to that country’s Islamic Revolution. However, by the mid-80s, oil prices crashed for a number of reasons, and fears that the world would run out of oil eased.

Oil prices were very high when The Third Wave was written.

Toffler lacked expertise about the energy sector (which is a big no-no for forecasting), and was making his Third Wave forecasts during an unusually bleak time characterized by rapidly rising fuel prices and dwindling U.S. reserves. It’s easy to see how those two factors, coupled with the inherent unpredictability of fossil fuel prices (a person able to consistently predict oil prices could quickly become a billionaire by trading in the futures market), led Toffler to make such an erroneously pessimistic prediction. 

Toffler’s predictions about the rise of telecommuting were basically right, with some important caveats. First, the practice hasn’t grown as quickly as he predicted. Second, full-time telecommuting has proven surprisingly unpopular, for reasons Toffler can’t be blamed for having foreseen. Given the choice, many workers would opt to be in the office at least some of the time to maintain personal and professional relationships that they’ve discovered require face-to-face interaction. Working from home alone can also be isolating and stressful, especially to extroverts. Some people also find it unproductive or negative in some other way to blur the boundaries between their professional and personal lives by working from home. Others prefer going to the office because it gives them an excuse to escape stressful domestic environments. (Note that Alvin Toffler worked with his wife for decades, and she co-wrote many of his books. I think he probably failed to appreciate how odd this arrangement was, and as a result he projected it onto his assumptions about average peoples’ preferences, and then it made its way into his predictions about the future of work. To a large extent, I think Ray Kurzweil’s fascination with speech interfaces replacing text and keyboards is also an example of a futurist failing to fully distinguish between his own preferences and those of typical people.) 

Alvin and Heidi Toffler were married and spent their lives working together as writers and futurists.

Additionally, being in the office carries important productivity-boosting benefits, like being able to physically handle office papers, and to quickly arrange face-to-face meetings with colleagues to efficiently discuss things rather than communicating through time-delayed emails. In predicting the rise of full-time telecommuting, I think Toffler ran afoul of what futurist Michio Kaku later (in 2011) identified as “The Caveman Principle.” The Principle holds that human nature was shaped by nomadic, tribal, low-tech, resource-scarce lifestyles that we had during the first 95% of our species’ existence; that human nature has not changed even though we are now several generations removed from that type of existence; and that predictions about future technologies and future lifestyles should be doubted if they conflict with inbuilt human instincts. I agree the Kaku’s insight is right, and it poses a major stumbling block to telecommuting.

Human beings are, by nature, social animals who like to see and be seen, and we are also tactile and like interacting with physical objects like papers and photos, and like being able to spread them out on a desk in any arrangement. Clearly, spending eight hours a day sitting alone at home, viewing abstracted images of things through a small, glowing portal, and navigating virtual file cabinets and directories clashes with some innate human preferences. While telecommuting also has important advantages (e.g. – no time wasted commuting to work; ability to work for distant organizations without relocating your home), the Caveman Principle and the other factors I listed have proven to be important counterweights to its expansion, and will continue to be. 

Moreover, I think the Caveman Principle poses a major challenge to Toffler’s prediction that cities would become obsolete and depopulate, and to the predictions made by others more recently that shopping malls are becoming obsolete. Since The Third Wave was published, the U.S. and all other Western countries have only urbanized more, and there are no signs the trend will letup. In particular, many American cities have undergone a renaissance since then, and are vastly safer, cleaner, and more attractive to live in. Toffler was writing at a time when urban decay and white flight were near their worst in America, and it’s quite possible he let this influence his thinking about where cities were headed. 

U.S. Census figures show the country’s population has been getting more urbanized since at least 1910.

Though the vast majority of metro areas in rich countries show no signs of depopulating, I can think of reasons it might happen in the distant future. Much better telecommuting/telepresence technologies–like full immersion virtual reality, augmented reality glasses, and holograms–might allow workers to stay in their homes while also genuinely feeling like they were physically in their offices, and for workers actually at offices to feel as if they could meet face-to-face with remote colleagues. If that were the case, 100% telecommuting would become more popular, and many workers would choose to move far from their work sites in order to save money (cities are expensive) or just be somewhere more pleasant. The array of technologies I’m describing could be available in as little as 15 years, will probably have roots in video gaming and remote warfare, and can be thought of as engendering a “new paradigm” of telecommuting that is qualitatively different from today’s practices. Additionally, it will vastly improve the distance learning experience, posing a challenge to the brick-and-mortar classroom model, and, presuming there are no protectionist legal obstacles, it could accelerate international job outsourcing.  

Mass unemployment, caused by machines and/or outsourcing, could also impel people to move out of cities in rich countries. Without jobs to keep them tethered in any one place, large numbers of people in metro areas would probably leave for more scenic locales, places with lower costs of living, and places with friendlier people. As I said in my travel blog about the Dakotas and Nebraska, uprooted people would congregate in certain types of places instead of dispersing evenly across the country. 

Also, bear in mind that the Caveman Principle stops influencing human behavior if 1) humans gain the ability to change their own nature, or 2) humans cease to exist. If humans use technology to radically alter our minds and instincts in the distant future, then we won’t be burdened with our Caveman instincts, and would be comfortable living our lives very differently. Tweak enough genes and create good enough virtual reality, and you might love spending your life in a coffin-sized pod plugged into the Matrix, in which case it wouldn’t make any difference whether your pod were in a city or the middle of a desert. Moving on to the second point, if the human race ceased to exist–either because another intelligent species destroyed us or we evolved into a radically different species–then concentrating people and infrastructure in specific places to make cities might be undesirable for any number of reasons.

So, it remains to be seen whether Toffler’s prediction about the obsolescence of cities will come true. I doubt cities will ever completely disappear, since it will make sense from the standpoint of resource efficiency to move physical cargo by ship where possible, which will necessitate the existence of ports, which will in turn necessitate the existence of auxiliary structures like warehouses, and it’s easy to see how it could make further sense from a logistics standpoint to cluster other purpose-specific facilities (factories, power stations, etc.) near them until the aggregation gets city-sized. And while all of the work that happens in this hypothetical machine port city could be done remotely, by an AI located in a server warehouse 8,000 miles away, it might be more efficient to put it inside the city to reduce communications time lag (note that high-frequency stock trade companies put their computers in New York or New Jersey to minimize lag of their stock trade orders to the New York Stock Exchange). 

In fleshing out his theory of history, Toffler also makes very useful observations about the past, yielding a new perspective on the present. Many fundamental facets of modern life that we accept as normal–such as living in cities, living among large numbers of strangers who are also very different from us, spending little time outdoors, having jobs where we are subordinate to strangers and work fixed hours, having to spend large amounts of time away from family members each day, and being constantly overloaded with information, material abundance, and choices–are in fact recent advents. As I wrote earlier, human life was totally different for the first 95% of our species’ existence, and it should come as no surprise that our biology and instincts are honed for that kind of existence and not for today’s industrialized, diverse, high-tech world. This “mis-fit” has been causing miseries and problems that Toffler and many thinkers have examined and drawn connections between (though people like Gregory Clark say some groups have adapted to modern life better than others). Fortunately, I agree with Toffler’s view that coming changes to technology, culture, and politics (e.g. – the automation of drudge work, the spread of telecommuting and flexible work schedules, personal assistant AIs tailoring themselves to the needs of individual humans, an expanded welfare state) will break down some of the worst aspects of the current paradigm and let us return to lifestyles more in tune with our natures.

Toffler’s descriptions of the problems of the late 1970s are very enlightening since they remind us that, relatively recently, the Western world went through a period of upheaval and self-doubt like we have today, and not only survived but thrived. I felt the hairs stand up on the back of my neck while reading these sections of the book, since they could perfectly describe the problems of 2018: widespread job dissatisfaction, widespread frustration with a lack of purpose in life, a feeling of being overwhelmed with new and conflicting ideas and with the pace of technological change, unjustified popular fears of machines “taking over” in the near future, fears of international chaos, frustration with a deeply flawed U.S. President, seemingly insoluble political gridlock in democratic countries, upheaval from minorities demanding more rights, and the rise of highly visible and often-violent extremist political groups on the Far Right and Far Left.

I wasn’t born until the 1980s, and I haven’t read much about the 1970s, but Toffler makes me want to so I can put the present era into a better historical context. The fact that the West emerged from that dark era stronger and reinvigorated gives me hope for us today, and leaves me more convinced than ever that much of the dourness about the world today owes to the media presenting a distorted, negatively-tinted view of things, and to the public’s ignorance of history and thus of how much the world has improved.

I think Toffler’s prognosis that the U.S. Constitution has become outdated, and that the many of the U.S. government’s rules and practices are obsolete, is 100% right, and it’s remarkable that he grasped this in 1980. Contemporary governments throughout the West were designed for long-gone eras when the pace of change was slower, there were fewer issues for governments to contend with, citizens were less diverse and had lower expectations, and public opinion was more homogenous due to the small number of news sources. Consensus was easier to achieve.

One of this blog’s big rules is “No politics/partisanship,” so I’ll just say that I think a new Constitutional Convention–led by principled, smart people who put country before party–would be very healthy for America and would sharply reduce the amount of gridlock and acrimony we have. Sadly, I doubt such a thing is politically possible now, which dovetails with Toffler’s second observation that making fundamental changes to the government would only get harder as time passed. We’ll still muddle through, though at much greater cost and annoyance than is necessary.

So I strongly agree with Toffler in a broad sense about this, but I disagree with some of the specific solutions he proposes, such as making voting ballots more complex (he proposed ideas that went way beyond ranked choice voting) and tallying votes on some other basis than geographic divisions. Radical ideas like that might have a chance in countries with highly educated populations (e.g. – Switzerland or Singapore), but would backfire in the U.S. by sowing confusion.

But make no mistake, I think Toffler is the most accurate futurist I know of. In fact, his predictions in The Third Wave have proven so accurate thus far (as of 2018), that I think his unfulfilled-but-not-implausible predictions are a good guidepost to what is in store for us. Here they are: 

  • Reusable spacecraft will dramatically lower the costs of getting people and cargo into space, and a self-sustaining, off-world industrial base will be created. 
  • We will gain the ability to filter bits of precious metal from the seas. (Toffler specifies that genetically engineered bacteria will do this, though much better filters could also.)
  • Genetically engineered humans will be made. (This may have just happened.)
  • We will start making clones of human organs–each person will have “backup” organs made from their unique DNA stored somewhere. (This is essentially the plot of the film The Island.)
  • Oil-free manufacture of plastic will become widespread. 
  • We will discover ways to artificially synthesize organic materials like wood and wool. (I recently posted a science article about a wood substitute made of polymer resin and chitosan.) 
  • Genetically modified food crops that need fewer fertilizers and pesticides and that can grow on poorer soils will be invented. This will benefit farmers in poor countries more than the Green Revolution’s earlier methods and technologies did. (This is developing slower than Toffler predicted, in part due to unexpected political resistance.)
  • Speech will become the primary means of human-computer interface. As a result, people will read and write less, and illiterate people will be able to get good jobs. (I agree that verbal/auditory computer interfaces will become more dominant over time, but text won’t disappear, if anything because it protects user privacy better.  Also, being illiterate usually goes hand-in-hand with other deficiencies of skills and cognition, so highly advanced speech interfaces won’t level the job playing field for illiterate people.) 
  • Once computers and sensors are embedded everywhere, the environment will become much more “interactive,” and human IQs might increase thanks to the added stimulation. (At the very least, having instant access to information, like a semi-intelligent AI that can answer your questions and walk you through unfamiliar tasks, would be kind of equivalent to having a higher IQ.)
  • Before the invention of writing, the body of human knowledge was in a constant steady-state because things were always being forgotten and relearned. Mass literacy was a second inflection point in the growth of human knowledge. The third inflection point will owe to data being stored in computers and sensors being everywhere in the environment, recording all events. Our civilization will achieve “total recall.” (Futurist Kevin Kelly calls this “Globenet” and “Memorex.”)
  • Computers will be programmed to think in unorthodox ways and to recombine existing knowledge in strange ways that humans would have never thought to do. This will lead to “a flood of new theories, ideas, ideologies, artistic insights, technical advances, economic and political innovations…” It will accelerate the pace of change in many domains, even if the computers lack “superhuman intelligence” as it is classically conceptualized.
  • Transit networks will become less congested as the population decentralizes, more people telework, and asynchronous work schedules become common (e.g. – fewer people working 9 – 5 and clogging up the roads at the same times each work day).

Links:

  1. https://www.nyjournalofbooks.com/book-review/how-democracy-ends
  2. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42135.pdf
  3. http://time.com/4501670/bombings-of-america-burrough/
  4. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/scientists-create-artificial-wood-that-is-water-and-fire-resistant/
  5. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/10736960/High-frequency-trading-when-milliseconds-mean-millions.html
  6. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/8453941/Physics-of-the-Future-by-Michio-Kaku-review.html
  7. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/15/us/remote-workers-work-from-home.html