Roundup of interesting internet articles, January 2018 edition

Career chemist sees no reason why chemical synthesis can’t be automated with current levels of technology. This may or may not
http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2018/01/30/automated-chemistry-a-vision

Alternate headline: “Humans can’t beat a simple computer program at predicting crimes.”
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2018/01/equivant-compas-algorithm/550646/

Microsoft’s CEO says that quantum computing will be an indispensable component of AI.
http://www.bbc.com/news/business-42797846

The “Nuro” is a Smart Car-sized, remote-piloted delivery vehicle. I think something like this will prove cheaper and more practical than flying drones for autonomous deliveries of cargo.
https://www.theverge.com/2018/1/30/16936548/nuro-self-driving-delivery-last-mile-google

This is one of those future concepts that I think will 50% completely fail and 50% succeed–albeit taking a different form than the author imagines.
https://hackernoon.com/driverless-hotel-rooms-the-end-of-uber-airbnb-and-human-landlords-e39f92cf16e1

1997 NYT article: When a computer masters the game of Go, “it will be a sign that artificial intelligence is truly beginning to become as good as the real thing,” but don’t worry since “It may be a hundred years before a computer beats humans at Go — maybe even longer.” [It happened in 2016.]
http://www.nytimes.com/1997/07/29/science/to-test-a-powerful-computer-play-an-ancient-game.html?pagewanted=all

In the 20 years since Deep Blue beat Gary Kasparov, the Elo scores of the best human chess players have barely improved, whereas machines have gotten vastly better: today’s best player, Magnus Carlsen, has a score of 2834, and the best computer chess programs are in the 3400s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_top_chess_players_throughout_history
http://www.computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040/rating_list_all.html

‘Once developed, [killer robots] will permit armed conflict to be fought at a scale greater than ever, and at timescales faster than humans can comprehend.’
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/01/29/opinion/killer-robots-weapons.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Ftechnology&referer

Just five years after Google’s neural network taught itself to recognize cat faces, the company thinks machines are ready to recognize 5,000 species of plants and animals. How many species could you correctly identify from photos?
https://qz.com/954530/five-years-ago-ai-was-struggling-to-identify-cats-now-its-trying-to-tackle-5000-species/

An article about how AIs will replace human workers slowly, and for the foreseeable future, will not destroy more human jobs than they create.
http://www.rationaloptimist.com/blog/artificial-intelligence-augments-human-skills/

One of the clearer descriptions of what a blockchain is.
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2018/01/blockchain-technology-concepts-explained.html

A fascinating description of how a blockchain-based replacement for Uber might work:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/16/magazine/beyond-the-bitcoin-bubble.html

Did someone say…”Predictions”?
https://qz.com/1171977/ten-2018-predictions-from-the-founder-of-the-blockchain-research-institute/

On the 50th anniversary of the Tet Offensive, it’s worth looking back at the weapons of the Vietnam War, and considering the handful of them that are still not obsolete (most notably, the AK-47 rifle).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weapons_of_the_Vietnam_War

Forty-five years after the end of the Vietnam War, the U.S. is selling warships to its former enemy.
http://www.janes.com/article/76746/vietnam-s-ex-us-coast-guard-cutter-arrives-home

Iraq plans to slap on some upgrades to keep their junker T-55 and Type 69 tanks running. The Type 69 is a Chinese copy of the Soviet T-62, which was an evolutionary upgrade of the T-55, which was an evolutionary upgrade of the T-54. If countries like Iraq keep cheapskating their militaries, will we someday have robot crews driving around 100-year-old tanks?
http://warisboring.com/iraq-learned-tank-lessons-in-the-war-with-islamic-state/

This clunker was commissioned in 1970 and will probably stay in service until 2039.
https://www.stripes.com/news/navy-s-oldest-deployable-warship-comes-out-of-yokosuka-dry-dock-after-19-months-1.508005

The first Cash for Clunkers program
http://warisboring.com/49425-2/

Swarms of small, cheap, semi-intelligent drones will probably dominate future warfare. The WWII-era “Bat Bomb” concept could make a comeback.
http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/17698/chinas-is-hard-at-work-developing-swarms-of-small-drones-on-multiple-levels

BAE is building microwave weapons that can fry the electronics of enemy planes, ships, and drones at close range. It might be an effective defense against swarms of small, cheap, semi-intelligent drones.
http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/17796/bae-systems-wants-its-new-microwave-close-in-weapon-system-concept-on-us-navy-ships

India’s aircraft carriers are vanity projects that will have little use in any all-out war with the most likely enemy, Pakistan.
http://warisboring.com/indias-third-aircraft-carrier-is-most-likely-a-waste-of-money/

Nuclear depth charges were a thing: a 30 kiloton underwater detonation (this is a below-average yield tactical nuke) sank dummy subs out to a radius of 1 mile.
https://medium.com/war-is-boring/how-to-nuke-a-submarine-2f0bd50f39e

“The rule of thumb is that vertical takeoff and landing means a 50% reduction in payload.”
http://edition.cnn.com/2018/01/06/politics/us-navy-baby-carrier-deploys-to-pacific-intl/index.html

In spite of the recent saber-rattling and improvements to North Korea’s nuclear missiles, a second Korean War is highly unlikely.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2018/01/11/should-you-worry-about-a-u-s-war-with-north-korea-not-really/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2018/01/03/why-nuclear-war-with-north-korea-is-less-likely-than-you-think/

Bill Gates and Steven Pinker agree that the state of humankind is continuing to improve, but only seems to be getting worse thanks to information technology and to an increasing williness of long-marginalized people to speak out, making us hyper-aware of what problems remain.
https://Fmobile.nytimes.com/2018/01/27/business/mind-meld-bill-gates-steven-pinker.html

Another step towards fleets of cheap, autonomous ships for oceanic and climate monitoring. In time, they would have even more uses.
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2018/01/141674.html

Someone has been photoshopping faces of female celebrities onto nude performers in porn videos. This is only the beginning: It’s only a matter of time before computers can easily make highly accurate, 3-D models of people just by looking at photos and video footage of them. As an intermediate step, the data could be used to find porn stars whose body types best matched each celebrity’s and to digitally graft the celebrity’s face onto each nude doppelganger, but ultimately, it will be possible to make fully lifelike, CGI porn movies starring any person.
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/bjye8a/reddit-fake-porn-app-daisy-ridley

“Average” is beautiful: “Facial averageness” is considered beautiful.
https://labs.la.utexas.edu/langloislab/face-perception/the-beauty-of-averageness/

Chinese geneticists have cloned monkeys, but the failure rate was extremely high: Out of 79 clone embryos they created and implanted into female monkeys, only two were born healthy. All the rest either spontaneously aborted or died shortly after being born. The technique or a slight modification of it could probably be used to clone humans.
http://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(18)30057-6

In the early 1800s, Iceland got its first non-white immigrant: a half black, half white man named “Hans Jonathan.” He had two kids with a white woman, and today, his DNA is found in 788 Icelanders. By sequencing the genomes of 182 of these descendants and cross-referencing them, geneticists were able to reconstruct 19% of Hans’ genome. The task was made easy by the fact that African DNA easily stood out, and by Iceland’s highly detailed genealogical records, but in principle, the same method could be used to reconstruct any ancestor’s DNA. With advanced enough technology, we could make “clones” of long-dead people.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-017-0031-6

Genealogy is kind of meaningless since ultimately, we all share the same ancestors and are from the same place. Stopping your research at one point in the past is an arbitrary choice, and having an ancestor that was famous or royal doesn’t make you special.
http://nautil.us/issue/56/perspective/youre-descended-from-royalty-and-so-is-everybody-else
http://livingstingy.blogspot.com/2010/10/why-genealogy-is-bunk.html

Identical twins also share the same epigenetics.
https://cosmosmagazine.com/biology/not-just-genes-identical-twins-exhibit-supersimilarity

Using frozen human embryos for IVF is just as likely to succeed as using fresh embryos.
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1705334

Baseline, subjective happiness level is also highly heritable, which raises the prospect of genetically engineering humans to be happier.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10902-016-9781-6
https://www.thecut.com/2016/01/classic-study-on-happiness-and-the-lottery.html

More on that: Brain damage and surgical removals of parts of the brain can improve people’s personalities. I wonder if it will be common for people in the future to get brain surgeries that make them happier or nicer.
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20180108-when-personality-changes-from-bad-to-good

Scientists have developed tiny needles that can inject drugs into the brain. Targeted injection sites can be as small as 1 sq mm.
http://news.mit.edu/2018/ultrathin-needle-can-deliver-drugs-directly-brain-0124

The amino acids and three-unit codons that form the basis of all genetics might be optimally evolved in form and function. Whenever we find organic alien life, its DNA will look and work almost identically to our own. There is, however, a small chance that a clean-sheet genome consisting of more types of amino acids and longer codons might be superior, but there’s no plausible way natural selection could bring it about (we have settled into a local optimum when the global optimum still lurks far off). Ultimately, optimizing biological life forms from the molecular level up is probably a task that only intelligent machines will be able to do in the distant future. All multicellular life forms are so finely-tuned to use the existing genetic alphabet that testing the hypothesis by changing things at the margins probably impossible.
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/01/expanding-the-genetic-alphabet/549620/

Is human wealth inequality just a manifestation of broad resource- and genetic-dominance inequality observed in any group of organisms?
http://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/114/50/13154.full.pdf

Reality check on a “revolutionary new cancer test” that the media massively overhyped. More health information isn’t always better thanks to the risk of false positives.
http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2018/01/22/a-hard-look-at-liquid-biopsies

Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon Prime provide extraordinarily cheap entertainment. Never in human history has it been easier for people to occupy themselves.
http://efficiencyiseverything.com/entertainment-per-dollar/

More on that:
http://empathyeducates.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Costs-For-Americans.png

Fallout 3 is a very highly rated game, takes 23-130 hours to complete, and can be bought for only $5. That averages out to…basically free.
https://howlongtobeat.com/game.php?id=3340
http://www.gamelengths.com/games/playtimes/Fallout+3/

Stephen Spielberg thinks “Ready Player One” is an accurate representation of the future…everyone is unemployed and spends their lives playing virtual reality games.
https://youtu.be/aWz6d1Z6bnU

Rollable TV screens will become mainstream once rigid screens get too big to fit through standard-sized entry doors. I think rollable, 8K resolution TVs that cover entire walls should become common in the 2030s.
http://money.cnn.com/2018/01/08/technology/lg-rollable-display-ces-2018/index.html

Google Glass may have failed, but I’ve always thought augmented reality (AR) glasses were a worthy tech concept that would return in an improved form. The “Vuzix Blade,” which reviewers have described as being an improved version of Google Glass that also makes use of the Alexa voice-activated AI assistant, could herald that return.
https://www.theverge.com/2018/1/9/16869174/vuzix-blade-ar-glasses-augmented-reality-amazon-alexa-ai-ces-2018

I really like the prediction about the future “on-demand economy.” Someone puts out a gig announcement, and AIs instantly figure out which human can do the gig the best, and they notify the person. If robots are constantly telling you to do one gig after another, it will kind of add up to something like a job.
https://msblob.blob.core.windows.net/ncmedia/2018/01/The-Future-Computed.pdf

Related: https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2018/01/filling-americas-6-million-job-vacancies/549752/

It’s been one month since the NYT front page article exposing the existence of a secret U.S. government program to study UFOs appeared, and the government has still made NO ATTEMPT to deny its claims.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/16/us/politics/pentagon-program-ufo-harry-reid.html

Guillermo del Toro saw a UFO: ‘The UFO, says del Toro, “Went from 1,000 meters away [to much closer] in less than a second — and it was so crappy. It was a flying saucer, so clichéd, with lights [blinking]. It’s so sad: I wish I could reveal they’re not what you think they are. They are what you think they are. And the fear we felt was so primal. I have never been that scared in my life.’
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/guillermo-del-toro-seeing-a-ufo-hearing-ghosts-shaping-water-1068754

A critic breaks down all of the reasons why the Star Wars First Order’s space ships make no design sense. I agree that advanced space ships won’t really have “top” and “bottom” parts, but they could still be asymmetrical.
https://www.popularmechanics.com/culture/movies/news/a28088/star-wars-the-last-jedi-dreadnought-star-destroyer/

The $30 million XPrize award for the first company that landed a private rover on the Moon will go unclaimed.
https://lunar.xprize.org/news/blog/important-update-google-lunar-xprize

It’s possible the recent SpaceX rocket launch was actually successful, but the military satellite they put in orbit is so secret that they had to claim it crashed and the mission failed.
http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/17612/the-secret-zuma-spacecraft-could-be-alive-and-well-doing-exactly-what-it-was-intended-to

Diesel car engines have been unfairly villified by the Volkswagen emissions scandal.
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-42666596

 

If New York’s government can sue oil companies for making global warming worse, than can someone else sue New York’s government for shutting down its nuclear power plants, which also made global warming worse?
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2018/01/new-york-suing-oil-companies-but-how-about-suing-new-york-for-shutting-nuclear-reactors.html

An argument against “geoengineering” turned on its head: Whale feces contains high levels of iron, iron dumped in seawater causes plankton blooms, and plankton blooms sequester CO2. Whale populations are about 70% lower now thanks to human predation than they were in pre-Industrial times. If we dumped iron powder in the oceans, we’d be restoring the natural carbon sequestration mechanism of the ocean rather than doing something unnatural.
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2018/01/iron-fertilization-of-the-ocean-is-as-natural-as-whale-poop-and-it-can-save-the-planet.html

 

 

Transhumanists are overwhelmingly likely to be the oldest children in their families.
https://slatestarcodex.com/2018/01/08/fight-me-psychologists-birth-order-effects-exist-and-are-very-strong/

Roundup of interesting internet articles, December 2017 edition

The U.S. working-age population would be shrinking right now if not for immigrants and the children of immigrants. This will continue until at least 2035.
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/03/08/immigration-projected-to-drive-growth-in-u-s-working-age-population-through-at-least-2035/

East Asia will have to import 275m people between the ages of 15 and 64 by 2030 to keep its working age population stable.
http://econ.st/2jT5FYx

But will demand for immigrant workers slacken once we have robot workers? Ben Goertzel thinks “toddler-level AGI” will be invented by 2030, followed by the Singularity.
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/12/ai-researcher-ben-goertzel-launches-singularitynet-marketplace-and-agi-coin-cryptocurrency.html

Skip the first 15 minutes. Greg Brockman believes deep learning isn’t close to hitting the limits of what it can do, and its capabilities will continue radically improving thanks to better, faster hardware. By the end of 2018, he thinks machines will be able to generate artificial audio and video (like imitations of human voices and totally fake video footage) that humans won’t be able to distinguish from reality. Within five years, he thinks a breakthrough will happen in robotics, making them much more capable and practical for use.
https://twimlai.com/twiml-talk-74-towards-artificial-general-intelligence-greg-brockman/

Google claims it can already convincingly fake human voices.
https://qz.com/1165775/googles-voice-generating-ai-is-now-indistinguishable-from-humans/

A timely counterpoint to bellicose declarations that “machines will never replace humans” and “human judgement will always be needed,” etc.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/12/washington-wreck-positive-train-control/548744/

Self-driving cars might offer people free taxi rides in the future, so long as passengers are willing to endure sales pitches from various corporate sponsors.
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/12/self-driving-cars-free-future/548945/

The typical American thinks his personal odds of losing work to machines are 30%, while everyone else’s odds average out to 49%.
http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/10/04/automation-in-everyday-life/#many-americans-expect-a-number-of-professions-to-be-dominated-by-machines-within-their-lifetimes-but-relatively-few-expect-their-own-jobs-or-professions-to-be-impacted

When asked individually, Americans say that they would not feel threatened by the discovery of non-intelligent aliens and it would not shake their religious beliefs, but they assume that would not be true for everyone else. ‘That may be because “most Americans tend to think, on any desirable trait or ability, that they’re better than the average person.”‘
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2017/12/04/how-will-humanity-react-to-alien-life-psychologists-have-some-predictions/

An article appeared on the front page of the NYT exposing a secret Pentagon program devoted to studying UFOs. It has evidence of UFOs doing impossible aerial maneuvers and anomalous physical materials recovered at UFO land/crash sites. As of the date of me writing this blog post, the Pentagon has not denied anything in the story.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/16/us/politics/pentagon-program-ufo-harry-reid.html

Videos leaked from that UFO program’s trove, showing a 2004 encounter between U.S. fighter planes and a strange object off the coast of California. The pilots could see it with their eyes and it also showed up on their visioning sensors.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/tom-delonge-takes-alien-research-215651746.html\

Humans are genetically programmed to believe bad news over good news, and are likelier to remember bad things. In opinion polls, this expresses itself as overestimation of metrics like the crime rate,  incidence of terrorism, and incidence of poor health.
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-42329014

Of course, sometimes the conventional wisdom that the world is getting worse is true: People with lower IQs and people who are overweight are breeding faster than everyone else.
https://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21732803-it-does-however-no-longer-seem-favour-braininess-data-half-million

‘This may be the most powerful gene-manipulation toolkit that has yet been described, and you can expect to see a lot of work on it in the coming months as other groups give it a shakedown. ‘
http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2017/12/08/crispr-the-latest-edition

The first two “gay genes” have been identified. By themselves, they don’t automatically make men gay, but they’re more common in gays.
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2155810-what-do-the-new-gay-genes-tell-us-about-sexual-orientation/

The FDA will make it easier for companies to sell DNA testing kits directly to Americans.
https://gizmodo.com/the-fda-just-made-it-a-lot-easier-for-dna-health-tests-1820216695

The FDA has approved a new wearable medical device: The Kardiaband EKG, which can be attached to an Apple Watch to detect abnormal heart activity with high accuracy.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-5138101/FDA-approves-Apple-Watchs-medical-device-accessory.html

‘..So perhaps we’re finally heading for that era of personalized medicine that everyone keeps talking about…as sequencing gets relentlessly cheaper and more widespread.’
http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2017/12/18/genetic-variation-gets-more-real-all-the-time

Woman, 26, gives birth to baby who spent 24 years as frozen embryo

Should society pay for uterus transplants so that infertile women can have “the experience of pregnancy”? The experience of raising a child seems to be what really counts, and it can be had much more cheaply and at lower risk through hiring a surrogate mother.
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/12/05/568453168/first-baby-born-to-u-s-uterus-transplant-patient-raises-ethics-questions

‘Public Health England says there is a large amount of evidence that shows e-cigarettes are much less harmful than smoking – at least 95%.’
http://www.bbc.com/news/health-42328236

Metformin is one of the best candidates for a human anti-aging pill.
http://www.bbc.com/news/health-42273362

Within your lifetime, the means to make yourself digitally immortal will probably be invented. Here is its nascent form.
https://www.npr.org/2017/12/19/572068474/illinois-holocaust-museum-preserves-survivors-stories-as-holograms

What bad futurism looks like:
Article title: ‘2018 is when something finally gives on North Korea’
At the end of article: ‘It’s possible that a year from now not much will have changed: no war, no talks, no significant results from sanctions.’
https://qz.com/1157919/2018-is-when-something-finally-gives-on-north-korea/

‘“It is beyond me why we think an enemy [like North Korea] would waste a perfectly good nuclear weapon to experiment with a hypothetical EMP when they could destroy an actual city…EMP is a loony idea. Once an enemy uses a nuclear weapon — for any reason — it crosses the nuclear threshold and invites a nuclear response.”’
http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/expert-emp-weapons-are-loony-idea-23695

The first atomic bomb–“Little Boy”–was surprisingly simple, and one man was able to build detailed blueprints for it using open source data. https://www.npr.org/2017/12/26/570806064/north-korea-designed-a-nuke-so-did-this-truck-driver

The first stealth aircraft, the F-117, is 40 years old. The U.S. built it thanks to insights gleaned from a Soviet paper on radar reflectivity, which was published 51 years ago.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/12/stealth-turns-40-looking-back-at-the-first-flight-of-have-blue/

Almost 20 years after the fall of Communism, most of NATO’s Eastern European members are still using Cold War-era weapons whose technology is not compatible with the West’s. A partial, affordable solution might be program to modify the Eastern European weapons.
http://www.janes.com/article/76473/kharkov-morozov-design-bureau-unveils-new-t-72-upgrade

Bulgaria has to send its fighter planes to Russia for maintenance, even though the country is in NATO and would have to use those same aircraft to fight Russia someday. The underfunding and failure to get rid of Soviet-era hardware could be a disaster in a war.
http://www.janes.com/article/76391/bulgaria-turns-to-russia-for-mig-29-logistics

In the U.S., we see problems from the opposite extreme, where the military is overfunded and has the luxury of falling for the siren song of advanced, unproven weapons tech that never get off the ground.
http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/16695/the-navy-is-changing-its-plans-for-its-dumbed-down-zumwalts-and-their-ammoless-guns

Upgrading old clunkers like UH-1 helicopters with autonomous capabilities could keep them in service for decades to come.
http://www.janes.com/article/76439/usmc-onr-conduct-final-autonomously-operated-uh-1-demonstration

Flying drones that are indistinguishable from birds would have great reconnaissance value to militaries. ‘Robirds use flapping wing flight as a means of propulsion, with a flight performance comparable to real birds.’
https://youtu.be/-gc8kBmzOOI

Fleets of cheap, autonomous mini-subs could map the seafloor. Someday, every shipwreck will be known and every chest-o-pirate-gold recovered.
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-42335230

Google Maps has so comprehensively mapped the Earth’s surface that it’s moving on to cataloging the exact locations of exterior building doors and mailboxes.
https://www.justinobeirne.com/google-maps-moat

By the end of 2018, the U.S. might be a bigger oil producer than Saudi Arabia or Russia. (U.S.-Canada fossil fuels production won’t peak until around 2030.)
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/12/us-crude-oil-production-could-be-more-than-saudi-arabia-in-january.html

The DoD’s experimental “safe” alternative to cluster bombs was basically a giant nail bomb. (It failed, and we’re just bringing back cluster bombs.)
http://www.janes.com/article/76101/pentagon-reverses-cluster-munition-ban

‘If you asked experts a few years ago when they expected this to happen, they’d have been likely to say in one or two decades. Earlier this year, some experts I polled had revised their forecast to within two to five years. But Martinis’s team at Google recently announced that they hope to achieve quantum supremacy by the end of this year.’
https://www.newstatesman.com/science-tech/technology/2017/12/how-quantum-computing-will-change-world

Throwing cold water on AlphaGo Zero’s recent gaming milestones:
https://medium.com/@josecamachocollados/is-alphazero-really-a-scientific-breakthrough-in-ai-bf66ae1c84f2

Two years ago, Elon Musk said we’d have autonomous cars in two years.
https://electrek.co/2015/12/21/tesla-ceo-elon-musk-drops-prediction-full-autonomous-driving-from-3-years-to-2/

This year, Elon Musk said he’d build a massive battery farm in Australia within 100 days. He did it in 60.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-42190358

“Space blindness”: The latest monkey wrench thrown into our big plans to go to Mars. “ The Mission has been “Only 20 or 30 years away” since I was a little kid.
At least our killer robots will get there someday.
https://lasvegassun.com/news/2017/dec/02/space-blindness-must-be-solved-before-mission-to-m/

 

Review: “Starship Troopers”

In the distant future, Earth prospers under a global, quasi-fascist oligarchy where only military veterans are allowed to vote or have political power. Earth’s military is enormous and is based around a fleet of large space warships that carry expeditionary soldiers called the “Mobile Infantry.” This force defends the expanding sphere of human civilization against a race of large, insect aliens nicknamed “the Arachnids.” After human colonists try to settle on an Arachnid planet, they retaliate by destroying the settlement and flinging an asteroid at Earth, destroying Buenos Aires and leading to all-out war between the two species.

The film focuses on the wartime experiences of Rico and his three friends, who all enroll in the military right after high school and quickly lose their innocence in the ensuing war. It is a classic bildungsroman tale, and though panned by most critics, is held in esteem for its entertainment value and satirical take on the fascist elements of American culture.

A date for the film’s events is not given, though we do have one clue. During the high school graduation dance party, a band performs a variation of David Bowie’s song “I’ve not been to Oxford Town.” The original song was released in 1995 and contained this stanza:

“But I have not been to Oxford Town

(All’s well)
But I have not been to Oxford Town
Toll the bell
Pay the private eye
(All’s well)
20th century dies”

The final line is understood to reference the rapidly approaching end of the 20th century.
The band performing at the high school graduation
The variant of the song we hear in Starship Troopers (which is entitled “I have not been to Paradise” and is on YouTube) has slightly modified that stanza:
“But I have not been to Paradise

(All’s well)
No I have not been to Paradise
Toll the bell
Pay the private eye
(All’s well)
23rd century dies”

Assuming the final line retains its significance, we can conclude that the movie’s events are set in the late 23rd century. For the sake of consistency, I’m going to say it happens in 2295, exactly 300 years after Bowie’s original song came out.

There will be megastuctures in space. During some of the space ship scenes, we see a manmade “ring” built around the Moon, which looks to serve as a giant military base and probably also a shipyard, and we also see a space fortress called “Fort Ticonderoga” whose width and height are measurable in miles considering how much it dwarfs the space ships. By 2295, it’s very possible we could have built megastructures in space like these. The key will be establishing self-sufficient space infrastructure first, along with the means to obtain raw materials from asteroids and low-gravity moons.

While building a 6,800-mile circumference ring around the Moon would be wasteful, a large space station or several smaller ones would make sense and could perform the same military and space ship dockyard functions at much lower cost. The Moon’s low gravity and nearly nonexistent atmosphere also make it well-suited for a space elevator, which could be used to cheaply transport raw materials mined from the surface into space, where they could be fashioned into space stations and ships.

Currently, we lack the infrastructure in space to build things there, and so we have to manufacture all of our satellites, space ships, and space stations on the Earth’s surface and then use rockets to put them in orbit, which is incredibly expensive (it costs $2,000 – $13,000 to get one kilogram of cargo into low Earth orbit, which is where the International Space Station is). Once we’re able to build things in space, from materials we find floating around in space, manufacture costs will sharply decrease, and we’ll be able to pay for things like huge space stations.

There will be many large space ships. The movie is filled with special effects shots of giant space warships flying around and attacking alien planets. As before, this is entirely plausible for 2295, and will be made possible by the same space-based manufacturing infrastructure that we’ll use to make space stations.

There will be space ships that can travel faster than the speed of light. The space ships in the film use something called a “Star Drive” to travel faster than light. This technology allows humans to spread outside our Solar System and to come into contact with the Arachnids. As I discussed in my review of the film Prometheus, the laws of physics say this is impossible, and I don’t think it’s useful to assume we’ll be able to figure out a way around them.

The military will still use human infantrymen. The film focuses on main character Juan Rico’s experiences in the “Mobile Infantry,” an expeditionary, ground fighting force similar to the U.S. Marines. Aside from their ability to move between planets on space ships and their access to nuclear bazookas, the Mobile Infantry’s technology, capabilities and tactics are stuck in the 20th century. In fact, their lack of armored vehicles, artillery, and close air support actually make their fighting force more rifleman-centric than most armies were in WWII, and some of the battles shown in the film are reminiscent of the high-casualty, “human wave” fighting of WWI.

This is a completely ridiculous vision of what the military and warfare will be like in 2295. Even making conservative assumptions about the rate of A.I. progress, human infantrymen will have been long replaced by machines, along with probably ALL other military positions, such as piloting space warships and doing logistical support. A fully automated or 95% automated military force could exist as early as 2095.

Guns will be big and clunky. The standard small arm of the Mobile Infantry is a large, boxy, gray rifle nicknamed the “Morita” (this was probably the name of its inventor or is a contrived military acronym that clumsily describes what it is), and it makes absolutely no sense as a weapon.

The Morita combines a bullpup layout (meaning the magazine is behind the hand grip) with an ultra-long barrel and extended fore-end, infusing the weapon with worst qualities of the bullpup and traditional rifle layouts and none of their strengths. The comically long barrel’s accuracy potential could have been a redeeming trait were it not completely wasted thanks to the guns lacking even simple iron sights. And instead of being sleek and skeletonized, the guns’ outer casings are blocky and thick. For example, the carry handles are completely solid slabs of metal, which is an egregious design flaw since a simple U-beam design would have cut weight without hurting the weapon in any meaningful way.

When your guns don’t even have BB gun iron sights, all you can do is spray and pray.

The Morita is an intimidating and vaguely futuristic-looking weapon that is actually inferior to most military rifles that were in use at the time Starship Troopers was filmed. It’s an interesting time capsule that depicts what people in the 1990s thought future guns would look like. In fact, the weapon that the Morita seems to have been based on, the French FAMAS assault rifle, is being removed from service and could be replaced by a derivative of the American AR-15, which was invented in the 1950s.

In the 20 years since Starship Troopers was released, gun design has in many ways gone in the opposite direction the filmmakers envisioned it would: Various militaries have discovered that the bullpup rifle layout is not better than the traditional layout overall (there are tradeoffs that cancel each other out) so bullpup rifles didn’t become more popular; gun designers focused on trimming weight and clumsy features like carry handles from existing models; and they redesigned the weapons to be sleeker and more customizable with accessories like flashlights and combat sights. And over that last 20 years, those accessories have miniaturized thanks to better technology and the demand to cut weight. In short, gun designs have converged on a handful of layouts that are mechanically optimal, and all of the R&D effort is now focused on tweaking them in small ways to wring out the last bit of efficiency and performance.

It wouldn’t make sense for people in the future to abandon the principles of good engineering by making highly inefficient guns like the Morita. To the contrary, future guns will, just like every other type of manufactured object, be even more highly optimized for their functions thanks to AI: Just create a computer simulation that exactly duplicates conditions in the real world (e.g. – gravity, all laws of physics, air pressure, physical characteristics of all metals and plastics the device could be built from), let “AI engineers” experiment with all possible designs, and then see which ones come out on top after a few billion simulation cycles. I strongly suspect the winners will be very similar to guns we’ve already built, but sleeker and lighter thanks to the deletion of unnecessary mass and to the use of materials with better strength-to-weight ratios.

Projectile weapons will still be used in combat. It’s 2295…SO WHERE THE HELL ARE THE RAY GUNS? I’m no expert in lasers or particle weapons, but I imagine that the technology will become practical for routine military use in the next 278 years. However, that doesn’t necessarily mean they’ll make kinetic energy weapons obsolete, particularly for close-range combat with lightly armored or unarmored opponents. A weapon that can kill a horse-sized, frenzied opponent by propelling a few tiny pieces of metal into its brain in under a second might be a better tool for the job than a laser.

Projectile weapons also have important, inherent advantages that militate against them ever becoming obsolete: Projectiles like bullets are minimally affected by atmospheric conditions (lasers can’t penetrate clouds or fog), can follow curved trajectories to hit targets hiding behind solid objects (lasers only travel in straight lines), and can carry payloads (explosives, poison) that render some secondary, specialized destructive effect to the target. And unless the laws of physics change in the future, smashing solid objects into other things at high speed will be a reliable way of destroying them until the end of time.

Moreover, while I think the average human being in 2295 will be heavily enhanced through genetics and artificial technologies, I doubt we’ll find ways to upgrade their skin and flesh to be bullet proof. Bullets, knives, baseball bats, and fists will still hurt them. Also, I don’t see how wild animals made of organic tissue like the Arachnids could have bulletproof bodies: no animals on Earth have shells, bones, or skulls that are too hard for our bullets to penetrate, and even if the Arachnids had exoskeletons that were twice as hard as, say, elephant skulls, we could pierce them by using larger bullets.

So, even in 2295, I think it’s plausible that projectile weapons will still be used in combat, alongside more advanced weapons like lasers. Handheld weapons that shoot out bullets could still be the weapons of choice for killing humans and other organic life forms in many circumstances. However, it’s possible the guns of the future might use something aside from gunpowder–such as electromagnetism–to propel their bullets, which wouldn’t make them “firearms.”

Some people will have missing limbs. Rico’s high school teacher and later, his unit commander, is a middle-aged man who is missing one of his arms and sometimes wears a mechanical prosthesis. Another man working a military desk job is also missing his arm and both legs. It’s strongly implied that the missing limbs were war wounds both men suffered during earlier military service.

This is completely unrealistic. By 2295, it should be possible to regrow human limbs and organs through therapeutic cloning, and to surgically graft them into people, with no chance of rejection. Seeing a physically disabled person who had a missing limb or was confined to a wheelchair will be as rare and as strange to people in 2295 as seeing someone trapped in an iron lung is to us today.

Some people will have advanced mechanical prostheses. As stated, Rico’s high school teacher sometimes wears a mechanical arm over his stump. It is clearly artificial, being made of articulated metal segments, but it somehow interfaces with his nervous and musculoskeletal system well enough to give him the same level of fine motor control over it that he has over his biological arm.

ARMed and dangerous!

Cybernetic limbs like this should be available by 2295, but due to human aesthetics, I doubt many people will want to get ones that are mechanical in appearance. People will prefer artificial parts that are warm, supple, and natural in appearance (recall Will Smith’s fake arm in I, Robot). I imagine some people would want to take this preference “all the way” by getting truly natural, 100% biological replacement limbs made through therapeutic cloning.

There will be bald people. Rico’s teacher, his basic training camp commandant, and several extras in the film had male-pattern baldness. A combination of things will have completely eradicated hair loss well before 2295, such as widespread genetic engineering, and cloning of hair follicles for implantation on balding parts of the scalp. Seeing a bald person in 2295 will be like seeing a person with cleft palate today: the presence of such an easily correctable condition will signal the person was deprived of access to medical care, or that they chose to live with the condition to visibly set themselves apart from the mainstream, possibly to adhere to arcane personal values.

Loud, low flying aircraft will fly around cities. Early in the film, there’s a brief moment where we see the futuristic skyline of Buenos Aires, and two fast-moving aircraft fly by at the same height as the skyscrapers, making jet-like roaring noises.

On the one hand, having loud aircraft fly low over crowded cities is a fly in the ointment for Starship Troopers’ portrayal of an orderly and comfortable future. Loud noises–whether from aircraft or anything else–disturb people, so it would stand to reason that, by 2295, more laws would be in place against them. NIMBYism only gets stronger as people get richer and get more free time to focus on less critical things.

But on the other hand, that is based on the assumption that future cities will be full of human beings. Intelligent machines wouldn’t have the same finicky senses that we do, so loud noises wouldn’t bother them, and low-flying aircraft might be far more common than today. In fact, machines could be perfectly comfortable in a wide variety of environments that humans would find intolerable, like an Earth saturated with toxic air pollution, a 20-degree hotter Earth ravaged by global warming, a pitch black Earth as featured in The Matrix, an Earth covered in piles of skulls and sad ruined buildings as shown in The Terminator, or an extraterrestrial environment where humans couldn’t survive for multiple reasons.

I don’t think intelligent machines are definitely going to kill off the human race, or even probably going to, but for sure it’s a possible outcome we could face by 2295. Another scenario is a hostile machine takeover of Earth that stops short of exterminating our species: Once defeated on the battlefield, disarmed, forced to sign the surrender papers, and evicted from the best places, the machines would ignore us unless we got in their way, and we’d scrape out some kind of existence on the margins. This is analogous to how humans today treat wild animals: we rarely think of them even though they’re all around us, we don’t help them even though we could make their lives much better at low cost, we don’t kill them unless they get in our way, and we don’t bother to consider how our activities affect them. If a property developer plans to bulldoze some woods to make a strip mall, he doesn’t first count the number of ant hills or squirrels that are there and try to recompense them.

In that “Second Class Citizen” future scenario (or maybe “Machine Dictatorship” scenario), it would be common for intelligent machines to do careless things that humans considered obnoxious, like flying loud aircraft low over human areas.

We will use nuclear weapons in wars against aliens. One of the Mobile Infantry’s weapons is a small nuclear missile launched out of a bazooka. In one instance, we see such a weapon used to blow up a crowd of Arachnids in an open area, and in two others scenes it is used to collapse the Arachnids’ underground tunnels.

In a real war with aliens, particularly if we felt our species’ survival was at stake, I have no doubt we would use nuclear weapons or any other type of weapon of mass destruction like germs and poison gas. Unless we had prior diplomatic dealings with them, there wouldn’t be any treaties like the Geneva Conventions to stop us. Moreover, if the fighting were happening in space and other planets, we could use WMDs without fear of contaminating our own biosphere or exposing our civilian populations to collateral damage. These factors would impel us to use other weapons and tactics that are today banned under international law, such as exploding bullets, and torture of prisoners.

Whether or not shoulder-launched, mini-nuclear missiles will come into common use by 2295 is unanswerable, though let me point out that it’s technically feasible. In fact, the U.S. first built these types of weapons, called “Davy Crockett Weapon Systems,” in the late 1950s. While those weapons were too big for anyone but a professional bodybuilder to fire from the shoulder, it’s likely they could be miniaturized with better technology without sacrificing their explosive yield.

The Davy Crockett nuclear launcher

If we actually fought with aliens like the Arachnids in 2295, we would be smart enough to recognize the gross inefficiency of sending in humans equipped with relatively weak guns, and we’d pick weapons and tactics better-suited for the task. Biological weapons that the Arachnids would spread among themselves, heavier-than-air poison gas that would sink down their tunnel networks, and combat drones that the Arachnids wouldn’t be able to effectively fight back against (e.g. – fast, pigeon-sized flying drone programmed to land on an Arachnid head and then detonate a shaped charge into its brain/nerve bundle) seem like the best ways of doing it, and don’t require us to make any leaps in our thinking about military technology. The same iterative process of optimizing guns in computer simulations that I described earlier would be used to quickly develop weapons, tactics, and strategies best suited for defeating the Arachnids.

Human colonies will exist on Earth-like planets outside our solar system. Early in the film, a news broadcast announces that a colony of Mormons living on an Arachnid planet were all killed by the aliens. Gory footage of a small, walled town full of mutilated bodies follows. It’s possible human colonies could exist on Earth-like planets outside our solar system by 2295.

Consider that the “Project Longshot” analysis make a semi-credible case that a fusion-powered spacecraft could be built, could accelerate to 12% of the speed of light, and could reach our closest celestial neighbor, Alpha Centauri, in 100 years. Astronomers haven’t spotted Earth-like planets in the Alpha Centauri system yet, but there’s no reason to rule out the possibility of their existence.

Working backwards, if we assume a small human colony is established on an Earth-like planet in Alpha Centauri in 2295, and the journey took 100 years, then we will have acquired the ability to make large, fusion-powered space ships by 2195. That’s not an unreasonable prediction.

We will have encountered non-microscopic, non-technological aliens. The antagonists in Starship Troopers are “the Arachnids,” a society of large, ferocious, alien insects of different species that live together in hives and are led by small numbers of intelligent “Brain Bugs.”

I don’t think anything remotely resembling the Arachnids exists in our Solar System, but it’s possible they could in other star systems. By 2295, we’ll have extremely powerful space telescopes that will have identified all of the exoplanets around our neighboring stars, and we’ll have received even better imagery from our interstellar probes.

Again, assuming that Arachnids live within seven light years of us, and we get advanced enough to build space ships that can reach 12% of the speed of light by the late 2100s, then Earth could know about the Arachnids’ existence by 2295. Enough time would have passed for our interstellar probes to reach the Arachnid planet and transmit a report back to Earth.

Humans will be telepathic. A minor element in the film is the existence of telepathy in a small minority of humans. One of Rico’s friends, Carl, is a telepath, and late in the film he uses his special ability to implant a thought in Rico’s mind, and to read the thoughts of a captured Brain Bug. People will have telepathic abilities like these by 2295, though they will exist thanks to computer brain implants and not to natural ability.

Government commercial encouraging psychics to come forward

Science has proven that psychic abilities such as telepathy, clairvoyance (seeing the future), and telekinesis (moving objects through thought alone) don’t exist. However, there’s no scientific barrier to creating devices like brain implants or hats that could monitor the brain’s activity to decipher a person’s thoughts or emotions. Furthermore, there’s no barrier to giving such devices wireless communication capabilities, thus allowing people to communicate with each other through thought alone. I discussed this in some depth in my Prometheus review (“Machines will be able to read human thoughts…”), and as such won’t go into more depth.

Without getting too sappy, let me say that widespread use of this kind of technology could have profound consequences for our civilization, as it could bridge the man-machine divide and inaugurate an age of close empathy between humans and even animals. Linking the thoughts, emotions, and sensations of individual beings would make misunderstandings and miscommunications much rarer, and might make cruelty and dishonesty impossible. Using technology to create such a world might be a greater accomplishment than going to other star systems.

Death figures from natural disasters will be immediately known. One of the film’s pivotal events is Buenos Aires being destroyed by an asteroid purportedly hurled at Earth by the Arachnids. The main character, Juan Rico, is a native of that city and is speaking with his parents (who still live there) via videoconference from a different location at the moment of impact. Rico doesn’t understand why the video feed suddenly goes black, but less than two minutes later, he sees a TV news broadcast showing live footage of the flaming city, along with banner text that says over 8.7 million people were killed. The personal tragedy is a pivotal event in Rico’s young life, and it convinces him to complete his military training and to swear revenge against the aliens.

Today, when a natural disaster happens, it takes days or even weeks to account for the dead, but by 2295, I think the tallies could be compiled within minutes, as happened in the film. By 2295, every structure on our planet will be cataloged in great detail in something like a hyperrealistic “Google Maps,” almost every corner of the planet will be under constant surveillance of some sort (video, audio, seismic, etc.), and almost everybody will wear or have implanted in them devices that track their locations and life signs. All of the different data sources will be cobbled together to make a nearly 1:1 digital simulation of the entire planet, where every building and every person was accurately represented, in real time. Most “blind spots” in the data could be inferred with high accuracy. Without a doubt, artificial intelligences would be monitoring the network and rapidly analyzing the data.

As such, if a meteor hit a city, or if any other type of sudden disaster happened, the physical and human destruction could be determined almost instantly.

Helicopter-sized craft will be able to fly back and forth between the Earth’s surface and space. The Mobile Infantry use relatively small “drop ships” to ferry soldiers between the massive space warships and the surfaces of the different Arachnid planets. The drop ships are faintly aircraft-like in appearance and have layouts reminiscent of the Sikorsky CH-54 helicopters: the fuselage is a minimalist “spine” that connects the cockpit to the drive systems and landing gear, and it has mounting points for detachable cargo containers. There are large drop ships that can carry detachable cargo containers full of 30 – 40 people, and smaller drop ships that can only carry 10 people. They appear the roughly the same size as today’s CH-47 and UH-60 helicopters, respectively. All of the alien planets the drop ships are shown flying in and out of appear to have gravity very close to Earth’s (e.g. – dropped objects fall at the normal speed and humans can’t jump way in the air). Ergo, the movie posits that, by the year 2295, helicopter-sized craft that are mostly full of empty space and stuff other than fuel and engine components, will be able to take off from the Earth’s surface, reach space, and achieve at least a medium Earth orbit.

One of the smaller drop ships

I doubt this will happen because it’s impossible to cram enough chemical rocket fuel into a helicopter-sized craft to propel it into space. Let’s assume that the larger Starship Troopers drop ship weighs the same as a CH-47, which is 40,000 lbs. Today, it would take a Delta IV Heavy rocket to get a payload of that weight into medium Earth orbit. The launch vehicle is 236 feet high and contains 1 MILLION lbs of rocket fuel. Additionally, the Delta IV Heavy uses liquid hydrogen (H2), which is the most energy-dense type of chemical fuel known to exist. It’s implausible to assume we’ve overlooked some kind of superfuel that is, say, 20 times as energy-dense as H2, so there’s no way the drop ships could fly into space using any kind of combustible propellant in their internal fuel tanks.

A much larger drop ship–perhaps the size of the Prometheus space ship–might be able to fly off the Earth’s surface on its own using chemical rocket power, simply thanks to having more internal volume for fuel storage. Of course, this would make for weirder action scenes, with each drop ship being as big as a mansion but only carrying ten men.

A CH-47 can hold up to 33 troops, which looked to be the same capacity as the larger Starship Troopers drop ships

The only way a helicopter-sized, single-stage craft MIGHT be able to reach space is if it had miniaturized, nuclear fusion-powered rockets, which is one of those things that is on the very edge of the edge of what scientists think might be possible to build someday. The perennial comeback to skeptics of fusion power is that the Sun is proof of concept, but the perennial comeback to that is that fusion power has been 50 years away and always will be. No one can say at this point, so I think it’s safer to say helicopter-sized drop ships won’t exist in 2295, but mansion-sized ones will.

Roundup of interesting internet articles, November 2017 edition

  1. Another reason why you should always be skeptical of Russian predictions about how strong their military will be within X years.
    http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/16175/russia-rolls-out-new-tu-160m2-but-are-moscows-bomber-ambitions-realistic
  2. Russia won’t start mass producing stealth fighters until 2027 at the earliest. (U.S. F-22s started rolling off the assembly line in 2005.)
    http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/russias-new-su-57-stealth-fighter-s-500-air-defense-system-23383
  3. Contrary to what is widely believed (thanks to fiction like The Hunt for Red October), the USSR/Russia has always been far behind the U.S. in submarine technology, and the gap is widening.
    http://nationalinterest.org/blog/why-russias-new-stealth-submarines-have-big-problem-22941
  4. The Russians used a spy ship with submersible instruments and winches to raise or destroy their two fighter planes that crashed into the Mediterranean during Syrian support operations. They did this within five days of each crash to prevent American subs from snatching them from the seafloor and examining the technology.
    http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/16379/russia-scooped-up-wrecks-of-crashed-naval-fighters-off-sea-floor-near-syria
  5. A tale of two military readiness levels (this has just a little bit to do with differences in how well-funded the two forces are).
    First: http://www.janes.com/article/75790/over-half-of-bundeswehr-s-leopard-2-mbts-are-not-operationally-ready
    Second: http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/16366/portlands-142nd-fighter-wing-launches-13-f-15c-ds-eagles-in-rare-snap-readiness-drill
  6. The Air Force is reusing WWII-era shells and 1950s-made barrels for some of their AC-130 gunship cannons. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.
    http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/16523/the-usaf-is-rebuilding-world-war-ii-era-40mm-shells-for-its-ac-130u-gunships
  7. What happens when you try fixing something that ain’t broke:
    http://warisboring.com/the-u-s-navy-still-hasnt-figured-out-how-to-make-a-decent-uniform/
  8. “Compounding the pain for the N.S.A. is the attackers’ regular online public taunts, written in ersatz broken English. Their posts are a peculiar mash-up of immaturity and sophistication, laced with profane jokes but also savvy cultural and political references. They suggest that their author — if not an American — knows the United States well.”
    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/12/us/nsa-shadow-brokers.html
  9. “The archives were found by veteran security breach hunter UpGuard’s Chris Vickery during a routine scan of open Amazon-hosted data silos, and these ones weren’t exactly hidden. The buckets were named centcom-backup, centcom-archive, and pacom-archive.”
    https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/11/17/us_military_spying_archive_exposed/
  10. We were supposed to have power armor in 2007. http://www.zdnet.com/article/mit-to-make-tech-exoskeleton-for-army/
  11. “As it was, Task Force Rogue One met only five out of the ten performance measures that the U.S. Army uses to evaluate a successful raid.”
    https://angrystaffofficer.com/2017/02/27/no-more-task-force-rogue-ones-a-tactical-analysis-of-the-raid-on-scarif/
  12. There’s no evidence that mandatory health checkups reduce the incidence or severity of diabetes, even when the checkups result in early warnings that patients are developing the disease.
    https://www.cato.org/publications/research-briefs-economic-policy/preventive-care-worth-cost-evidence-mandatory-checkups
  13. A handful of people are still in iron lungs.
    https://www.yahoo.com/news/america-apos-last-iron-lung-222200990.html
  14. Big pharma is less profitable than you probably think, and its profit trajectory is grim.
    http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2017/11/28/a-grim-future-here-are-the-numbers
  15. A brain exercise has finally been scientifically proven to reduce the odds of getting dementia.
    http://news.medicine.iu.edu/releases/2017/11/brain-exercise-dementia-prevention.shtml
  16. Getting you genome sequenced now costs less than $2,000, but prices haven’t dropped in several years. It still isn’t worth the money for most people since we can’t make sense of what it means.
    https://www.genome.gov/sequencingcostsdata/
  17. The genetic mutation inhibits the PAI-1 enzyme, extends lifespan by 10 years and sharply reduces the risk of Type 2 diabetes. It doesn’t seem to carry any downsides.
    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/15/well/live/amish-mutation-protects-against-diabetes-and-may-extend-life.html
  18. The ethical concerns about cloning are almost entirely baseless.
    FYI, some mammal species are harder to clone than others because of their reproductive cycles and chromosome structures. Sheep and cats are easy, but apes and humans are very hard.
    http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-42066629
  19. “The Amara hype cycle is unfolding today with respect to machine learning.”
    http://www.rationaloptimist.com/blog/amaras-law/
  20. Related:
    http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2017/03/24/the-genomic-revolution-shows-up-late-but-shows-up
  21. An excellent lecture. Deep learning is being overhyped, and by itself will never lead to artificial general intelligence. A.I. research probably needs ten times as much funding as it is getting, spread out across different labs approaching the problem from totally different directions.
    https://youtu.be/7dnN3P2bCJo
  22. Humans still reign supreme over machines in Starcraft 2. I couldn’t find videos of any of the matches, but I suspect most of the Norwegian AI’s astonishing-sounding 19,000 actions per minute (a world-class human player might do 200 actions per minute) were thanks to the machine ordering its units to do useless things like run around in random, constantly changing patterns.
    https://www.technologyreview.com/s/609242/humans-are-still-better-than-ai-at-starcraftfor-now/
  23. ‘The twin challenges of too much quantity and too little quality are rooted in the finite neurological capacity of the human mind. Scientists are deriving hypotheses from a smaller and smaller fraction of our collective knowledge and consequently, more and more, asking the wrong questions, or asking ones that have already been answered.’
    https://aeon.co/ideas/science-has-outgrown-the-human-mind-and-its-limited-capacities
  24. Is a stressed-out human phone operator who is trained to suppress and fake their own emotions and to read from a script more “personable” than a machine? Will human advantages in jobs requiring emotional interaction and nurturing endure?
    https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2017/11/are-humans-actually-more-human-than-robots/545714/
  25. If you had a human friend who had elementary knowledge of 40 languages and could do basic translations between any two of them, would you be laughing in their face at their mistakes, or would you be in awe of their intelligence?
    http://www.bbc.com/news/av/technology-42066517/google-pixel-buds-language-translation-tested
  26. Say what you will about Tulsa, Oklahoma, but they’ve enacted outstanding land use laws to minimize the occurrence and damage caused by flooding. Basically, no one can build houses in flood-prone areas, and the city instead builds things like public parks and soccer fields there. Higher sea levels and more frequent floods does not have to mean more deaths.
    https://www.npr.org/2017/11/20/564317854/how-tulsa-became-a-model-for-preventing-floods
  27. Human adaptation to biodiversity loss is also feasible: “Thirty to 40 percent of species may be threatened with extinction in the near future, and their loss may be inevitable. But both the planet and humanity can probably survive or even thrive in a world with fewer species. We don’t depend on polar bears for our survival, and even if their eradication has a domino effect that eventually affects us, we will find a way to adapt. The species that we rely on for food and shelter are a tiny proportion of total biodiversity, and most humans live in — and rely on — areas of only moderate biodiversity, not the Amazon or the Congo Basin.”
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/we-dont-need-to-save-endangered-species-extinction-is-part-of-evolution/2017/11/21/57fc5658-cdb4-11e7-a1a3-0d1e45a6de3d_story.html
  28. An environmentalist professor, Mark Jacobson, who published an absurd article in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences claiming that the U.S. could switch to 100% clean energy by 2050 is suing other professors that wrote a joint rebuttal article. His actions are not going over well in the scientific community.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/11/03/when-scientists-sue-scientists/
  29. Plants are green because they don’t absorb the green-colored portion of the visible light spectrum. The pink-colored windows absorb the green light and turn it into electricity.
    https://phys.org/news/2017-11-solar-greenhouses-electricity-crops.html
  30. An interesting idea. And if Bitcoin goes extinct, you could rent your server to anyone who needed to do computation (for stuff like protein folding, processing computer game graphics, etc). Two problems though: 1) The economics of this idea are murky since the server would need to be replaced at significant expense every few years as its hardware became obsolete and 2) if everyone had a computer server space heater, then the global supply of server capacity for rent would wildly fluctuate with the seasons. Since most people live in temperate parts of the Northern Hemisphere, available server capacity would spike in the winter and shrivel away in the summer.
    http://blogs.harvard.edu/philg/2017/11/08/bitcoin-mining-space-heater/
  31. The smartest type of smart home might have only a few smart, centralized components monitoring many dumb ones. Trying to make every appliance and feature in a house smart is actually dumb.
    “The level of detail smart breakers look at is impressive. Mr Holmquist says that his can, for example, measure the revolutions-per-minute of the compressor in a refrigerator. Not only would this let an app monitor how hard the appliance is working, it could also give warning if that appliance was about to break down.”
    https://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21731610-old-fuse-box-gets-new-lease-life-smart-circuit-breakers
  32. Why having industry standards and two or three established big guys dominating a market is important:
    https://qz.com/1132657/an-internet-of-things-flop-means-some-connected-lights-wont-work-anymore/
  33. It’s just as likely this discovery will end up as another flash in the (bed)pan that goes nowhere, but it’s interesting nonetheless.
    http://www.janes.com/article/75947/arl-utilises-bodily-fluids-for-power-generation
  34. Bird tracking devices weighing only a gram will exist soon, allowing smaller birds to be tagged. What happens someday when we have pellet-sized tracking implants that cost almost nothing, and robots that can do the work of implanting them in animals for free?
    https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/11/where-the-birds-go/545945/
  35. Why speculate about creepy future surveillance when Facebook is doing it now?
    https://gizmodo.com/how-facebook-figures-out-everyone-youve-ever-met-1819822691
  36. From my “Rules for good futurism”: A prediction can be wrong in its specifics, but right in principle. “But if Second Life promised a future in which people would spend hours each day inhabiting their online identity, haven’t we found ourselves inside it? Only it’s come to pass on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter instead.”
    https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/12/second-life-leslie-jamison/544149/
  37. He’s totally right that 1) most “news” content is garbage designed to be consumed instantly and forgotten within days, 2) reading news articles that are several months old is an invaluable tool for seeing just how much garbage is really garbage, and 3) it takes time and a trained mind to recognize garbage without the benefit of hindsight.
    https://qz.com/1117962/advice-on-how-to-read-from-a-professor-whose-job-is-to-predict-the-future/
  38.  Some rare, creative thinking. “Perhaps hyper-advanced life isn’t just external. Perhaps it’s already all around. It is embedded in what we perceive to be physics itself, from the root behavior of particles and fields to the phenomena of complexity and emergence.”
    http://nautil.us/issue/42/fakes/is-physical-law-an-alien-intelligence
  39. Telescope capabilities are about to vastly improve. The 2020s will be full of important new astronomy findings.
    https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/11/by-2020-upgrades-to-gravity-wave-detectors-will-detect-one-to-two-neutron-star-collisions-per-month.html
  40. A metaphor for China as a whole.
    https://qz.com/1137026/chinas-first-all-electric-cargo-ship-is-going-to-be-used-to-transport-coal/
  41. 2018 could be the year Venezuela finally implodes. If they run out of foreign currency reserves and default on their loan payments, then that’s it.
    https://qz.com/1128894/venezuela-has-finally-defaulted-on-its-debt-according-to-sp/
  42. I just figured out how robots are going to kill us all in the future. “A baby-aspirin-size amount of powdered toxin is enough to make the global supply of Botox for a year…The LD50 for it in humans is estimated at about 2 nanograms/kilo i.v., 10 nanograms/kilo by inhalation.”
    http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2017/11/06/theres-toxicity-and-theres-toxicity
  43. Stephen Hawking doesn’t think he’s the smartest person alive, and he thinks people who boast about their high IQs are “losers.”
    https://youtu.be/4lwFK1ImzcA
  44. Do a YouTube search for “how to set a mouse trap”. The earliest video I found was uploaded in 2006–only two years after YouTube was invented–and is perfectly clear. Since then, probably hundreds more instructional videos of this simple task have also been uploaded to the service, the most recent appearing a week ago. What’s the value-add to the videos made after 2006? How much of the ongoing “exponential growth in digital content” is totally redundant?
    The Original: https://youtu.be/QBVOFY7SDOg
    The (latest) Reboot: https://youtu.be/0xriqCJKgYM

Roundup of interesting internet articles, October 2017 edition

  1. The U.S. could have beaten the U.S.S.R. into space.
    https://www.popsci.com/interservice-rivalry-that-delayed-americas-first-satellite-launch?ePZmFpuivxk1tpDE.01
  2. Eisenhower bears part of the blame, since newly released documents show that U.S. intelligence had given him good estimates of when Sputnik would be launched, but he grossly underestimated its propaganda value. Could he have done more to speed up the launch of America’s first satellite?
    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/06/science/sputnik-launch-cia.html
  3. Reading this makes me think that humans will never leave Earth in large numbers unless we have Star Trek levels of technology (if such a thing is even possible).
    https://qz.com/1105031/should-humans-colonize-mars-or-the-moon-a-scientific-investigation/
  4. However, there’s nothing stopping us from getting off this berg in token numbers for, say, a Mars mission. But we’ll probably need to simulate gravity during the trip or else the astronauts will develop all kinds of health problems. (Would a mere 25% of Earth gravity do the trick?)
    http://www.theage.com.au/good-weekend/astronaut-scott-kelly-on-the-devastating-effects-of-a-year-in-space-20170922-gyn9iw.html
  5. Earth has five LaGrange Points, two of which would be useful parking places for satellites.
    https://www.space.com/30302-lagrange-points.html#sthash.rNZf8a0K.gbpl
  6. The LaGrange Points might also be good places to search for alien spy probes. That and other creative suggestions about how to find intelligent aliens are in the article.
    http://nautil.us/blog/why-well-have-evidence-of-aliensif-they-existby-2035
  7. What would a planet that was MORE hospitable to organic life than Earth be like?
    https://youtu.be/xrYjXOX9NLg
  8. The War of 1812 dispelled the notion that citizen militias and civilian insta-generals were adequate for American self-defense (idealism was very strong in the early days). A professional, standing military was necessary. Had more pragmatic men been in charge in the years before 1812, Canada might be part of the U.S. today.
    http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/5-times-the-us-navy-was-sunk-battle-22582
  9. Several countries are developing “Guided bullets” that have some ability to steer themselves to home in on targets. For now, the emphasis is on using them to destroy enemy land vehicles and drones at long ranges, but they’ll eventually find anti-personnel uses.
    http://www.janes.com/article/75087/orbital-atk-progresses-new-medium-calibre-munition-development
  10. Would Americans be willing to sacrifice Facebook access to save Taiwan?
    http://blogs.harvard.edu/philg/2017/10/18/the-next-war-at-sea-will-actually-be-entirely-under-the-sea/
  11. While the U.S. military has practically become a byword for waste and bureaucracy, and the Ford-class aircraft carrier project has been singled out for cost and timeline overruns, one analysis claims the ships actually represent an optimal balance of size, capability, survivability, and cost.
    http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/study-bigger-aircraft-carriers-are-better-22756
  12. The U.S. Army has finally bought Israel’s battle-proven “TROPHY” active protection system for installation on its tanks. This should have been done years ago, but was held up by the Pentagon’s insistence on developing an American-made system that has gotten stuck in the classic rut of spiraling costs and overly ambitious capabilities requirements.
    http://www.janes.com/article/74744/ausa-2017-us-army-buys-trophy-active-protection-system-for-abrams-tank-brigade
  13. The Humvee might be more survivable than its (Bentley-priced) replacement because it has fewer electronic components, making it less vulnerable to EMP weapons.
    https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/10/humvee-has-no-electronics-for-emp-to-damage.html
  14. An improved typhoid vaccine has been created
    http://www.bbc.com/news/health-41724996
  15. An improved shingles vaccine has received a CDC recommendation.
    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/25/health/cdc-shingles-vaccine.html
  16. The FDA approved two gene therapies, one to treat blindness (http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/10/12/557183740/fda-panel-endorses-gene-therapy-for-a-form-of-childhood-blindness) and the other to treat blood cancer. (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/18/health/immunotherapy-cancer-kite.html)
  17. Contaminated cell lines might have corrupted data in tens of thousands of medical studies. Most futurists like to speculate about AI scientists discovering new things, but I think there would be tremendous value to having them re-examine and in many cases redo experiments their human counterparts did long ago.
    http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2017/10/20/bad-cells-so-many-bad-cells
  18. Chinese scientists have used CRISPR to make genetically engineered pigs that have less fat. This could actually reduce animal suffering and save farmers money since pigs that have less fat are, ironically, less likely to freeze to death in cold weather. FDA approval for sale in the U.S. is unlikely because Americans watch too many horror movies about mutant animals.
    http://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2017/10/23/559060166/crispr-bacon-chinese-scientists-create-genetically-modified-low-fat-pigs 
  19. Organic farming has very few, if any, environmental advantages over conventional farming.
    https://ourworldindata.org/is-organic-agriculture-better-for-the-environment
  20. The Placebo Effect and the related Nocebo Effect are both stronger when test subjects are made to believe the sham substances they’re being exposed to cost a lot of money.
    http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2017/10/06/expensive-shams-are-the-way-to-go-apparently
  21. California leads the nation! Flame retardant chemicals that the California state government effectively made mandatory for the whole U.S. in 1975 cause a slew of health problems.
    https://qz.com/1098161/the-us-government-is-finally-acknowledging-the-flame-retardants-in-your-furniture-and-baby-products-are-not-just-ineffective-but-also-dangerous/
  22. To stop accidental hot car deaths, Congress might require carmakers to build features into their vehicles that warn drivers if they’ve left their kids inside. This blog post and its links describe three possible engineering solutions, the simplest of which is an algorithm that monitors door opening and closing sequence.
    http://blogs.harvard.edu/philg/2017/10/26/congress-considering-ordering-cars-to-add-about-1-iq-point-my-2003-idea/
  23. 350 kw charging stations that can recharge electric cars in 10-15 minutes are coming.
    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/05/automobiles/wheels/electric-cars-charging.html
  24. Cars windshields and roofs might also someday be made of single pieces of Gorilla Glass, giving people in the front seats completely unobstructed views. More generally speaking, all kinds of objects in the future will look unchanged from today, but will have seemingly magic properties thanks to advanced materials and to sensors and computers being embedded in them.
    https://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21730128-soon-gorilla-glass-and-its-descendants-will-be-everywhere-one-worlds
  25. A small hint of the coming advances in materials science.
    http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2017/10/11/darn-near-flatland
  26. Engineering improvements are in the cards as well. A supercomputer tasked with optimizing the designs of airplane wings created wings with organic-looking arrangements of beams and supports. What kinds of redesigns will machines make to everyday objects, and what kinds of obvious opportunities for improved design efficiency have we missed so far?
    http://www.nature.com/news/supercomputer-redesign-of-aeroplane-wing-mirrors-bird-anatomy-1.22759
  27. Truck tailgating improves the fuel efficiency of the following vehicle AND the lead vehicle. When autonomous trucks become common, I’m sure they’ll use “platooning” all the time.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/trafficandcommuting/are-those-80000-pound-trucks-tailgating-each-other-soon-it-may-be-perfectly-normal–and-safe/2017/10/22/fbbbb0fa-a2de-11e7-b14f-f41773cd5a14_story.html
  28. ‘At very small scales, fixed-wing and multirotor designs become less efficient, and insect-like drones with flapping wings may make more sense. Tiny drones could be used for virtual tourism, letting remote users “fly” around with the aid of virtual-reality goggles. In short, today’s drone designs barely scratch the surface.’
    https://www.economist.com/news/technology-quarterly/21723004-pioneer-evolutionary-robotics-borrows-drone-designs-nature-dario-floreano
  29. The “Wave Glider” unmanned drone ship harnesses solar energy and wave power to generate electricity for itself, and could stay at sea indefinitely. (I’m sure mechanical breakdowns impose a limit on endurance.) http://warisboring.com/this-weird-drone-feeds-on-hurricanes/
  30. If everyone will have a robot butler in the future, and if the butlers will be able to download any knowledge or skill, then does that mean they’ll be able to fix anything you own? Wouldn’t they also know how to do preventative maintenance and inspections on all your stuff? Are we headed for a future where things almost never break?
    http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/baltimore-city/bs-md-fixit-20171021-story.html
  31. A new AI “was able to solve reCAPTCHAs at an accuracy rate of 66.6% …, BotDetect at 64.4%, Yahoo at 57.4% and PayPal at 57.1%.” That’s not as good as the 81%+ pass rate typical of humans, but it’s still high enough to render CAPTCHAs obsolete as a means of differentiating between humans and machines. I bet the AIs have entered the “human range” of skill in this narrow task, and can solve CAPTCHAs as well as human children, humans with poor eyesight, and humans with low intelligence.
    http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/10/26/560082659/ai-model-fundamentally-cracks-captchas-scientists-say
  32. …And here’s a domain where AIs have achieved super-superhuman levels of performance: AlphaGo defeated all the world’s best human Go players last year, and AlphaGo Zero just defeated AlphaGo in a 100-game tournament, with no losses.
    https://www.technologyreview.com/s/609141/alphago-zero-shows-machines-can-become-superhuman-without-any-help/
  33. Stephen Wolfram gives an impressive talk about the future of AI (you can just feel the genius oozing out of him). It gets really interesting towards the end when he talks about how most “work” we do in rich countries today would seem like the equivalent of playing video games to people from antiquity. Will “work” in the future look like video gaming today?
    https://www.level9news.com/wolfram-discussing-ai-singularity/
  34. A great roundup of quotes from very smart people (including Thomas Edison!) who didn’t think airplanes would work. Makes you wonder about today’s experts who “confidently” predict that machines will never achieve human intelligence, or will only do so hundreds of years from now.
    https://www.xaprb.com/blog/flight-is-impossible/
  35. More on that.
    https://intelligence.org/2017/10/13/fire-alarm/
  36. And a good counterpoint that throws cold water on the AI hype.
    https://www.technologyreview.com/s/609048/the-seven-deadly-sins-of-ai-predictions/
  37. I never thought of this, but yes, magic tricks won’t impress robots since they’ll be able to use their advanced visioning sensors to see what’s actually happening.
    http://blogs.harvard.edu/philg/2017/10/04/beat-three-card-monte-with-google-glass-and-remotely-located-human-or-artificial-expert/
  38. The Quantified Earth
    http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/environment/news/a28708/earthquakes-fiber-optic-cables/
  39. Long gone are the days when a brilliant person could make a profound scientific discovery working alone in his lab. Science isn’t “over,” but we’ve certainly picked all the low-hanging fruits, and new discoveries can only be made through massive investments of human talent and money. Makes you wonder whether how well Einstein could distinguish himself today.
    https://qz.com/1106745/were-running-out-of-big-ideas/
  40. Blade Runner 2049‘s CGI Rachael looked vastly better than Rogue One‘s CGI Tarkin and Leia, possibly because the special effects team spent a whole year working on Rachael.
    https://io9.gizmodo.com/the-secrets-behind-blade-runner-2049s-most-surprising-s-1819675592
  41. Fascinating questions to ponder: How many stable chemicals are possible, how many of those can useful things for us, and what percentage of the useful chemicals have we already discovered?
    http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2017/10/10/how-many-natural-products-are-being-found-and-how-many-are-there
  42. Japan’s population has been shrinking since 2010, and the trend won’t stop for the foreseeable future. The good news? More space per person.
    https://qz.com/1112368/abandoned-land-in-japan-will-be-the-size-of-austria-by-2040/

Roundup of interesting internet articles, September 2017 edition

Sorry about my long absence, but I promise more blog entries are coming. In the meantime…

  1. High-tech solutions to global poverty still aren’t substitutes for basic infrastructure, good government, property rights, and cultures of trust. Here’s one recent article about it and two older ones:
    https://qz.com/1090693/zipline-drones-in-africa-like-rwanda-and-tanzania-have-an-opportunity-cost/
    https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2016-08-30/debunking-microenergy
    https://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2016/08/bot-we-trust
  2. GE is working on robots the sizes of small animals and insects that can crawl around inside jet turbines for inspections, and maybe for repairs as well in the future. Are we headed for a future where things never break down?
    https://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21729737-robotic-mechanics-can-go-anywhere-tiny-robots-will-inspect-and-fix-jet-engines
  3. ‘Professor Simon Blackmore, head of engineering, argues that an even bigger benefit could be in providing fleets of small, light robots, perhaps aided by drones, to replace vast and heavy tractors that plough the land mainly to undo the damage done by soil compaction caused by . . . vast and heavy tractors. Robot tractors could be smaller mainly because they don’t have to justify the wages of a driver, and they could work all night, and in co-ordinated platoons.’
    http://www.rationaloptimist.com/blog/robot-farm-machinery/
  4. If machines take all of our jobs and do them better and faster than we can, then it could portend a world where billions of unemployed humans spend their days in hyperrealistic virtual reality games engineered by machines.
    https://youtu.be/jOOB9Q1Nj8Y
    https://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2017/03/economist-explains-24
  5. Many of the action scenes in the superhero movie Logan were done using incredibly lifelike CGI simulacra of the actors. Will actors someday make money by licensing the use of their digital likenesses in movies instead of physically starring in them?
    https://youtu.be/TxWu5Brx_As
  6. I definitely agree with this. I think Elon Musk’s statements about AI and other things are part of a deliberate strategy to keep the public’s attention focused on him. As a businessman dependent upon the faith of his investors to keep his enterprises afloat, he needs to constantly stay in the spotlight and to project an image of being smarter than everyone else to keep the dollars flowing.
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-09-19/google-s-ai-boss-blasts-musk-s-scare-tactics-on-machine-takeover
  7. Per my previous blog entry, being able to quickly replace 100,000 cars destroyed by a hurricane is a respectable feat, but it would be better to find a way to keep the 100,000 cars from being destroyed at all.
    http://www.npr.org/2017/09/25/553475557/rental-firms-disaster-readiness-may-help-usher-the-age-of-self-driving-cars
  8. Computers make weird mistakes in some object recognition tasks, but so do humans.
    http://www.kurzweilai.net/human-vs-deep-neural-network-performance-in-object-recognition
  9. ‘Distributed ledgers are useful technology, just like banks. As they become a larger part of finance, the temptation to abuse them will be just as great. History instructs that no governance is perfect, and humans are reliably awful.’
    https://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2017/09/not-so-novel
  10. Our cells are full of organic nanomachines which support our most basic life functions, and since Richard Feynman’s 1959 lecture on the subject, it has been recognized that this was proof of concept that fully synthetic nanomachines were also feasible. Yet only recently have scientists managed to build crude but functional nanomachines in labs.
    http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2017/09/25/building-our-own-molecular-machines
  11. Don’t get your hopes up about Amazon flying drone package delivery: there are legal liability issues with packages accidentally dropping on people’s heads, and major noise issues. Flying cars would be handicapped by the same problems. Fortunately, there’s still a lot of room for improving the efficiency of ground transit with technology.
    https://qz.com/1085214/google-moonshot-lab-cofounder-sebastian-thrun-talks-flying-cars-automated-teaching-and-an-ai-arms-race-with-china/
  12. A useful quote to remember when contemplating flying cars: ‘Flying machines are inherently more complicated to operate than ground vehicles, and the consequences of error or malfunction are much greater—because of gravity.’
    https://warisboring.com/u-s-marines-portable-helicopters-were-too-crazy-to-survive/
  13. And in typical form, McKinsey beats this issue to death: ‘Drones require good weather and are now limited to loads of 7.5 kilograms or less and a route of 15 to 20 kilometers. Infrastructure that will support commercial delivery is lacking, and concerns about theft, hacking, crashes, and privacy worry consumers. Finally, drones need a minimum of about two square meters to land, more than many urban households can offer.’
    https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability-and-resource-productivity/our-insights/urban-commercial-transport-and-the-future-of-mobility
  14. Would aliens 10,000 more advanced than humans have electric motors that are any better than ours? Would they have better mousetraps as well?
    https://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21728888-better-motors-go-better-batteries-electric-motors-improve-more-things
  15. Seeing as how so many people vote on the basis of falsehoods, prejudice, or party affiliation and commonly vote against their own self-interests without realizing it, might democracy benefit if machines tried to reason with voters one-on-one before elections?
    http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-40860937
  16. Disreputable peer-reviewed scientific journals are an even bigger problem than thought. Some of the junk papers are written by NIH-funded scientists and by scientists working at prestigious universities like Harvard.
    http://www.nature.com/news/stop-this-waste-of-people-animals-and-money-1.22554
  17. Anytime you’re down on the U.S. Big Pharma industry, consider the massive fraud that exists within China’s equivalent. (Russia is just as bad.)
    http://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/clinical-fakes-09272016141438.html
  18. Your month of birth determines a surprising amount about your academic performance, all the way to college.
    https://www.utoronto.ca/news/oldest-kids-class-do-better-even-university-u-t-study
  19. Birth month also affects your odds of becoming an athlete, thanks to the same cutoff date effect.
    http://www.bbc.com/sport/olympics/18891749
  20. An important counterpoint to the growing anti-Vaxx movement is this: Teen vaccination rates for HPV are now over 50% and rising. The vaccine actually prevents several types of cancer.
    https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/09/22/health/hpv-vaccine-teenagers.html
  21. Chinese scientists have edited the genomes of human embryos to fix single-point DNA mutations (yes, this appeared in a peer-reviewed journal).
    http://www.bbc.com/news/health-41386849
  22. One more experiment finished showing that humans could bear the psychological stresses of a years-long Mars mission. Now about that space radiation problem…
    https://www.space.com/38180-hi-seas-8-month-mars-simulation-ends.html
  23. Two years ago, Russia and Turkey were at each other’s throats over the latter’s shootdown of the former’s attack plane, and there was talk of all NATO being dragged into war over it. Recently, Turkey turned it back on the the alliance to buy an advanced antiaircraft system from Russia.
    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/12/world/europe/turkey-russia-missile-deal.html
  24. The U.S. Army’s first upgraded Stryker rolled off the assembly line.
    http://www.janes.com/article/74356/first-us-army-upgraded-stryker-dvh-rolls-through-production

Roundup of interesting internet articles, August 2017 edition

  1. In a parallel universe, it’s still the 1990s and there was a Moore’s Law for the number of random pipes and hoses strewn across the landscape.
    http://www.boredpanda.com/scifi-girl-robot-traveling-artbook-simon-stalenhag/
  2. China has rolled out (pun intended) a copy of the U.S. Stryker armored vehicle
    http://www.janes.com/article/73292/norinco-rolls-out-vp10-8×8-vehicle-variants
  3. Here’s a needlessly long-winded piece about the long, long history of Christian theologians, cult leaders and even Popes wrongly predicting Biblical Doomsday.
    https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/aug/25/yearning-for-the-end-of-the-world
  4. A survey of 150 people shows about 1/3 of them could hand-draw common corporate logos (for companies like Burger King and Starbucks) from memory, with disturbing accuracy. (I estimate it takes 100 – 200 repetitions of the same commercial before I become cognizant of whatever is being advertised).
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4813514/Only-16-people-correctly-recall-famous-logos.html 
  5. Britain is repainting its Challenger tanks with a camouflage scheme similar to what it had for its West Berlin-based tank unit in 1982. What’s old is new, and visual concealment methods don’t seem to have improved in 35 years.
    https://warisboring.com/new-urban-camo-wont-save-british-tanks/
  6. Medical micromachines were successfully used on lab rats to deliver antibiotic loads. I don’t understand why medical nanomachines get all the attention and hype when micromachines are more technically plausible and could do many of the same things.
    http://bigthink.com/design-for-good/for-the-first-time-tiny-robots-treat-infection-in-a-living-organism
  7. An analysis of the accuracy of Gartner Hype Cycles from 2000 to 2016 is an informative catalog of failures.
    https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/8-lessons-from-20-years-hype-cycles-michael-mullany
  8. Here’s an outstanding rebuttal to Kevin Kelly’s recent “Myth of a Superhuman AI” article. I’ve never heard of the author before, his blog only has three entries, but he’s written a very thorough and convincing treatise, all the more impressive since he didn’t write it in his native language (he’s Finnish).
    https://hypermagicalultraomnipotence.wordpress.com/2017/07/26/there-are-no-free-lunches-but-organic-lunches-are-super-expensive-why-the-tradeoffs-constraining-human-cognition-do-not-limit-artificial-superintelligences/
  9. Geneticists have uncovered the chemical steps through which magic mushrooms produce their hallucinogenic agent, psilocybin. Large scale industrial production of it could be possible, because the world badly needs more drugs.
    http://cen.acs.org/articles/95/web/2017/08/Magic-mushroomenzyme-mystery-solved.html
  10. A reality check for lab grown meat.
    http://gizmodo.com/behind-the-hype-of-lab-grown-meat-1797383294
  11. A video that clearly and simply describes the operation of Mazda’s new, high-efficiency gas engine, which operates like a diesel part of the time.
    https://youtu.be/9KhzMGbQXmY
  12. Scientists and inventors are dispensable, but great artists, writers and musicians are not. (A somewhat humbling thing to remember when debating the usefulness of a STEM vs. humanities education.)
    http://www.rationaloptimist.com/blog/tim-harford-review/#.WX-QCkibyHc.facebook

Review: “Killzone” (the PS2 game)

[Below is a review of the video game “Killzone,” which I wrote while in college, over ten years ago. While I admit it’s a little silly to hold a video game to such scrutiny, my conclusions are still valid, and this piece is significant because it was my first attempt to put part of my own future vision in writing, even if it is a critique of someone else’s vision.

This repost will be the first in a recurring series of film and video game “Reviews” that I’ll be doing to assess the feasibility of whatever futuristic elements they depict. 

I’ve edited this Killzone review a little for clarity and brevity. ]

A couple days ago I finally finished the game “Killzone” for PS2, and I have some thoughts about it. First, a bit of background: “Killzone” takes place at some unspecified point in the distant future when mankind has mastered interstellar space travel and colonized two new planets, Vekta and Helghan. Vekta looks identical to Earth, while Helghan is barren and polluted.

Over the generations, the humans of Helghan–known as the Helghast–were genetically mutated by their harsh environment to the point of being barely-human freaks. The Helghast are also warlike and have a tradition of military leadership. At the start of the game, the cool Intro video shows the Helghast army invade Vekta by surprise. While the motivations for this aren’t clearly stated, after reading the “Killzone” booklet I believe it was probably done to obtain resources that Helghan lacks.

This is where you, the player, come in. You play a soldier named “Templar,” serving in Vekta’s ground forces (called the “ISA”). As the game progresses, three other character join your team: Luger is the woman, Rico is the heavy weapons guy and Hakha is the Helghast/human “hybrid.” Among them, Templar is the natural leader and all-around balanced fighter while the other three have specific combat specialties. By the midpoint of the game, you have the option of playing as any character you wish at each level. I thought this was a pretty cool touch because each character has unique abilities and weapons that make the levels a different experience depending on whom you choose. Anyway, you blow away a bunch of Helghast and save the planet–from the first invasion wave.

Along with the the selectable player option, I also liked how “Killzone” was neither too short (“Max Payne 2”) nor too long (“Halo 2”). However, there were some areas needing serious improvement. The gameplay could be awkward: You can’t jump period, making it impossible for your big, soldier self to clear small obstacles like a Jersey Wall; grenades are almost impossible to aim and take about 10 seconds to throw and detonate; climbing ladders is an ordeal; and aiming the sniper rifle gives new definition to the word “tedious.” While the A.I. is an O.K. challenge, the enemies aren’t varied enough and there are only like three different types of Helghast soldiers. Your fellow A.I. squad mates are of inconsistent help during gameplay. The game’s story was also pretty boring. Overall, “Killzone” is playable but falls short of what it could have been.

I also noticed some crude demographic stereotypes in the game. On your team, for instance, the leader is Templar: the handsome younger white guy. Luger, being a woman, is weaker in terms of health and physical strength and has to rely on her sniper pistol and sneaking skills as she runs around in her skin tight black jumpsuit killing bad guys. Rico, being the only “colored” person on the team (he looks Latino), is big, tough, dumb, vulgar, and slow, and fittingly starts each mission with a big machinegun/rocket launcher while his teammates have smaller, more precise weapons. Hakha’s bald head and pale skin cast him as the stereotypical older white man, and he predictably uses received pronunciation, quotes passages from literature to the rest of the team, and knows the most about computer and electronics systems.

“Killzone” also presents an extremely incongruous vision of the future. Let’s begin: We are told at the beginning of the game that humans have inhabited Helghan and Vekta for several generations, which I’ll very conservatively assume means “50 years.” Thus, 50 years before the start of “Killzone,” mankind had already 1) mastered faster than light space travel and 2) built spacecraft cheaply enough to allow mass numbers of people to be transported to Vekta and Helghan. The requisite scientific breakthroughs for these two technological advancements will almost certainly not arrive before the middle of the 21st century, and in fact may prove totally elusive. Considering the facts and estimates in this paragraph, we are left to conclude that “Killzone,” at the very earliest, takes place 100 years in the future–2106 A.D.

Problematically, the world of “Killzone” ignores all of the other scientific breakthroughs and new technologies that will also be made by 2106. For instance, all of the weapons used in the game are simply 20th-century firearms, but with cool-looking exteriors that make them look advanced when in fact they’re not. By 100 years from now, small arms will certainly be much more advanced. I wouldn’t be surprised if directed energy weapons or EMP-powered railguns had totally superseded firearms. I also expect small arms to come with built-in sensors, computers and actuators that allow the guns to sense which target their shooter wanted to hit, and to automatically aim themselves at it. All you would have to do is aim at someone’s body, pull the trigger, and the gun would make sure the bullet went directly through the person’s brain or heart. Not just that, but through the part of the organ that caused the most damage and the most immediate incapacitation. The gun’s computer would also automatically shuffle between different types of ammunition to inflict maximum damage on the target and could also automatically adjust the velocity of the projectile. As a result, the small arms of 2106 will require almost no training to be used effectively. And if they incorporated nanotechnology, future guns might be able to make their own bullets and conduct self-repairs and maintenance, meaning the weapons would be self-cleaning and would last almost forever.

But the more fundamental problem with “Killzone” is that humans will be obsolete on the battlefield by 2106. Think about it. Even the most hardcore, well-armed, futuristic supersoldier still needs hours a day to eat, sleep and take care of other personal needs. He or she still feels pain, questions orders, makes mistakes, and is subject to irrational and unpredictable emotions. A machine, on the other hand, would suffer from none of these faults. Machines are also expendable whereas humans are not, meaning that it would be easier politically to wage a war if a nation’s casualties were solely machines. A human still needs at least 16 years of growth and development to be physically and mentally able to handle the demands of combat, followed by months or even years of specialized military training. A combat machine could be built in an afternoon and then programmed with its military training in a few minutes. Clearly the future of warfare belongs to machines. By 2106, fighting machines will make war a cruelly unfair environment for human beings, where only the most desperate or foolhardy members of our species will dare set foot. Without direct human participation, the battlefield will become totally devoid of all the camaraderie, honor and bravery that stand today as the few positive attributes of war, and warfare will complete its evolution towards becoming a totally cold and anonymous endeavor.

A Predator drone aircraft in flight. The Predator is a remotely controlled aircraft that first entered service with the U.S. Air Force in 1995 as a reconnaissance (spy) plane. In 2001, it was armed with Hellfire anti-tank missiles and was successfully used against Taliban forces in Afghanistan. It remains in use. A Predator drone costs only $3.5-4.5 million to manufacture. Compare that to an F-16 C/D, which costs almost $20 million.

It probably looks petty for me to spend so much effort lambasting “Killzone” because it’s just a video game. That is certainly true, but the fact remains that games like “Killzone” embody and reinforce the ill-informed visions of the future held by most people, and I believe that critiquing the game is the most immediate way I can help people examine their own ideas. I think few people realize how unrealistically our future is portrayed in popular culture. Things like “Star Trek,” “Star Wars” and “Halo 1 & 2” have created the preposterous misconception that the universe is filled with humanoid, alien intelligent life forms that are all +/- 50 years our same level of technology. Considering 1) the age of the Universe (13.5 billion years old), 2) the fact that the planets are oldest at its center of the Universe and youngest at its fringes thanks to the Big Bang, 3) the fact that 3.5 billion years separated the appearance of the first primitive bacteria to the evolution of intelligent life on Earth, and 4) that chance that cosmic events have seriously altered the pace of Earthly evolution, we can conclude that the Universe is certainly populated with intelligent species of vastly different levels of technology.

To have human space explorers discover an intelligent alien species close to our level of technology is akin to having you randomly pick a name out of a three-inch thick phone directory and finding out that that person shares your same year, date, hour, minute, and second of birth. It is overwhelmingly likely that you will instead randomly pick someone who is different from you, and similarly, it is overwhelmingly likely that alien civilizations we encounter will be vastly older or younger than we are and thus either vastly stronger or weaker than we. So this recurring sci-fi trope where humans are fighting future space wars with aliens is ludicrous: any war with an alien species is certain to be very lopsided in favor of one side, and hence very short. This is actually where “Killzone” gets a bit of credit, since the plot has humans from different planets fighting one another. Sadly, I can see that as realistic even in 2106.

I also take issue with “Killzone” and most other sci-fi portraying the racial makeup of our descendants as being essentially the same as it is in contemporary America: The majority are white people, with smaller, roughly equally sized minorities of blacks, Asians and Hispanics. NO. Eighty percent of the current world population is nonwhite, and in the future, once Third World areas have closed the economic and technology gap with the West, we will see the world’s true racial character more vividly in everyday life. Multiracial people will also be much more common.

Another demographic shift very rarely portrayed in future sci-fi is the graying of the population. Average human lifespans have been increasing steadily for more than 100 years, and there is no reason to expect this trend to abate. By 2106, expect average people to be living to 120, if not indefinitely. Moreover, they will be stay active much longer thanks to better medical technologies. The means to slow, halt and reverse the effects of age will probably be achieved. “Killzone,” like all other Sci-Fi depictions of the future, fails to recognize the societal implications of these new technologies. Older people will look and feel DECADES younger than they are chronologically.

No carrier upgrade for you!

Yet another Russian military BIG PLAN that was announced with trumpets has died quietly.

The “Admiral Kuznetsov”

Russia’s single, outdated, and ailing aircraft carrier the Admiral Kuznetsov will spend the next 2-3 years just getting repaired, presumably from wear and tear incurred during its recent deployment off Syria and also probably to fix a backlog of known problems that existed long before the ship even left port. Russia’s plans to use the downtime to also upgrade the carrier have been canceled due to lack of money.

The Admiral Kuznetsov had a less-than-distinguished performance in 2016 operating in the eastern Mediterranean against ISIS: Two of the carrier’s fighter planes crashed while trying to land on it. After the first accident, most of the ship’s aircraft transferred to Syrian government ground bases and operated from there.

For comparison, China now has two aircraft carriers, one of which is about equal to the one the Russians have, and the other of which is better. The Chinese will start building a third in a few years.

The U.S. has 11 supercarriers, which individually are several times better than any of the carriers China or Russia has. The U.S. also has eight smaller carriers called “Amphibious Assault Ships.”

Russia is possibly the world’s worst offender when it comes to making overly ambitious predictions about future improvements to its military, technology, economy, or infrastructure (and, unsurprisingly, about negative things that will happen to its competitors like the United States). I think this owes partly to a unique cultural habit of lying (the “vranyo“), which is accepted and readily seen through by Russians, but misunderstood by foreigners.

Links

  1. http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/russias-only-aircraft-carrier-has-big-problem-21535
  2. https://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2016/12/05/Second-Russian-fighter-jet-crashes-attempting-aircraft-carrier-landing/4261480940373/
  3. http://www.janes.com/article/65775/russian-carrier-jets-flying-from-syria-not-kuznetsov
  4. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/23/magazine/from-russia-with-lies.html

Battlestar Galactica nitpick: 2D radar screens to depict 3D space

I’ve been a huge science fiction fan since childhood, but one franchise that has oddly not attracted my interest until now is Battlestar Galactica. Specifically, I’m talking about the series that aired from 2003-09.

When that series was ongoing, I tried watching a few episodes but just couldn’t get into it. For some reason, the quasi-documentary nature of how the show was filmed put me off. I also didn’t watch the show from the first episode onward, so each time I sat down and gave it a try, I had no clue who the characters were or what the plot arc was about.

Last night I had nothing to do and discovered Battlestar Galactica was available to me through Hulu. I watched the very first episode, and this time around was gripped.

For those of you who don’t know, Battlestar Galactica is about a space war between humans and their robots, called “Cylons” (SAI-lahns). The technology depicted in the show is much more advanced than our own (i.e. – there are giant spaceships, faster than light travel, and bipedal robots), and the events take place in a different part of our galaxy. The humans are descended from people who came from Earth, but for some reason, Earth’s location has been lost to history. Forty years before the events depicted in the series, the Cylons–who were servant robots–violently revolted against their human masters and flew away in space ships to found their own worlds. During the first episode of the series, the Cylons return for unexplained reasons and stage a massive sneak attack (meaning this is the Second Human-Cylon war) that destroys the human planets and the human space fleet. Of the handful of surviving human space ships, the most powerful is an aircraft carrier called the Battlestar Galactica, commanded by an older man named “Adama.” Disorganized, demoralized and grievously wounded, the remaining humans have to find a way to survive against overwhelming odds.

For reasons I’ll describe in much greater detail in future blog posts, I think the vision of a future where humans explore the galaxy in faster-than-light space ships and still do tasks like flying fighter planes and fixing plumbing leaks with wrenches will never come to pass. So at the most basic level, I think Battlestar Galactica is an inaccurate depiction of what our future might look like.  But one thing that really stuck out to me as silly was the use of old-fashioned radar screens on the bridge of the Battlestar Galactica. Here’s a screenshot of the bridge:

And a tight shot of one of the “radar screens” (and yes, before anyone complains, I’m sure they’re actually making use of more advanced sensor technology than solely radar):

There’s a basic problem here: 2-dimensional screen displays are terrible at depicting 3-dimensional space. 2D displays are fine when you’re dealing with 2D environments, such as in naval warfare, where your surface ship is in the middle of a basically flat, featureless plain and uses its radar to locate other surface ships also on the plain. But in space, the ships are free to move in any direction and to approach each other from any vector, making useless any conceptualization of space as being planar, or of there being an “up” or “down.” Trying to “square the circle” by thinking like that will just get you into trouble, particularly if you’re in a fast-paced space battle with a smart enemy that has figured out what your spatial-thinking biases and limitations are (“Battlestar Galactica returns fire fast when we attack it from the front, back, left, and right, but it returns fire slowly and misses a lot when we attack from the top or bottom.”). The time spent looking at a flattened visual depiction of the space around you and then mentally calculating what the elevations and depressions of other ships are and then trying to synthesize it all into some global picture of where everything is and how it’s all moving around will cost you dearly in an actual space battle.

The best approach will instead be to show space ship commanders accurate, 3D representations of their surroundings. I’ve seen this depicted well in other sci-fi. For example, in Return of the Jedi, the Rebel command ship’s bridge had a hologram of the Death Star, which the commanders presumably used for real-time monitoring of that vessel and their own fighters that were attacking it. Using a more zoomed-out view, the Rebel commander could have used holograms to track the progress of the broader space battle and to see the locations of all ships, in 3D space.

Return of the Jedi bridge hologram

Babylon 5 and Ender’s Game also depicted another approach: Making the bridge’s interior one, giant, 360 degree wraparound screen that displayed live video footage from outside the ship.

Minbari ship bridge
Ender’s Game command center view

And Star Trek Deep Space Nine depicted the same visioning capabilities for ship commanders, but delivered via augmented reality glasses instead of wall screens (a smart use of a limited TV show budget).

DS9 eyepiece

All of these visioning technologies are hands-down better than using 2D radar screens to try and see what’s happening outside your space ship. And considering the overall level of technology present in the Battlestar Galactica (Faster than light engine? Enough said.), I don’t see why the ship couldn’t have also had one or all of these other devices on its bridge. Maybe someone on the show’s creative team just didn’t think things through enough, maybe they did but didn’t have the budget for anything but small computer screens, or maybe they were deliberately trying to make the ship look old-fashioned (but again, the result is nonsensical).

This silliness gets taken a step farther when Adama announces that he’s taking the Battlestar Galactica to a remote outpost to regroup against the Cylons, and to chart a course there, he unrolls a paper star map on the big table in the middle of the bridge and starts drawing on it with rulers and crayons. Sigh. I realize Adama’s “thing” is that he’s a grizzled old guy who doesn’t like technology, but this is taking it too far. Typing the desired coordinates into the ship’s computer would instantly spit out a more efficient and accurate course than he ever plot using old-time mariner’s tools.

I think that whenever we actually do have space ships of similar size and sophistication to the Battlestar Galactica, their bridges won’t look anything like they do on the TV show. Just for the sake of redundancy, I think there might be small, 2D sensor screens and even paper star maps shoved off to the side somewhere, but they’ll only be used in emergency situations where all the better technology has broken. The notion of a space battle being managed by an old human man who likes to look at screens and draw lines on paper will be laughable. In reality, the ship’s systems–including its weapons systems–would probably be entirely automated, and the best captains and fighter pilots would all be machines. The old guys would die fast.